In-Service Teacher Reflections on Program Innovations towards Education Responsive to Local Communities
Abstract
Innovation in teacher training encompasses additions to a program so as to serve the most recent skills required by stakeholders. Innovation requirements push the redesign of in-service teacher education program which has seen embedding of an internship aspect. Using the theory of partnering pedagogy, these innovations focus on provision of education that is relevant and responsive to the local communities around and beyond the school. The innovations engage principles of effective pedagogy to design activities that involve and promote local community engagement practices and learning experiences. Using educational design research, ten in-service teachers participated a program that was recently reviewed with some innovation brought aboard. This study is qualitative which explored in-service teachers’ reflections on having gone through a recently reviewed in service program with innovations on board. The in-service participated in a reflection on their lived experiences and impact on their pedagogic practice having gone through the reviewed program. The resultant qualitative data was subjected to content analysis. Findings indicate that program review innovations that bring local stakeholders aboard allow integration of competencies beneficial to in-service teachers, learners, and the local community in which the school is located. Innovation design that engages communities lead to pedagogic practices that emphasize learning by doing and not just transmission and accumulation of theoretical knowledge. Innovation in program design and review should therefore focus on activities that engage the in-service teacher, learners, and the local community. This leads to the design of innovations that focus on quality learning and development of contextually purposed skills for the local community. However, because of the collaborative attribute among stakeholders, there are challenges in the implementation of innovative suggestions. It is concluded that innovations in program design and review need to be contextually relevant because then, their impact extend to the local communities surrounding the school. In these ways, innovations provide avenues for schools to provide quality learning opportunities and skills to serve the local communities and beyond.
Downloads
References
Barrie, S., & Pizzica, J. (2019). Reimagining university curriculum for a disrupted future of work: Partnership pedagogy. In J. Higgs, G. Crisp, & W. Letts, Education for Employability: Learning for Future Possibilities. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense-Brill Publishers.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Berkshire, England: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Butcher, J., Bezzina, M., & Moran, W. (2011). Transformational partnerships: A new agenda for higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 29-40.
Commonwealth of Learning. (2020). Distance Learning Guidelines. Commonwealth of Learning.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 95-108.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006, May/June). Constructing 21st Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.
Employer guide to structuring a successful internship program. (2016). Good internships are good business. Rhode Island, South Africa: BRIDGE.
Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Framework for partnership in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
Fox, H. L., Thrill, C., & Keist, J. (2018). Advancing Program Review: Evaluating and Envisioning the Future of Program Review at Illinois Community Colleges. Illinois: Office of Community College Research and Leadership.
Garone, A., Bruggeman, B., Philipsen, B., Pynoo, B., Tondeur, J., & Struyven, K. (2022). Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence. Education and Information Technologies. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10928-6
Gaskell, A. (2016). Sustainable Development and Inclusive Quality Education. Journal of Learning for Development, 1-2.
Harlen, W. (2014). Assessment Standards and Quality of Learning in Primary Education. York: Cambridge Primary Review.
Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (2006). What is an authentic learning environment? In T. Herrington, & J. Herrington, Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education (pp. 1-14). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-594-8.ch001.
Kennedy, E. (2021). Blended Learning in Teacher Education & Training: Findings from Research & Practice. Brussels, Belgium: European Schoolnet (EUN Partnership AIBSL).
Keynan, I. (2014). Knowledge as responsibility: Universities and society. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 179-206.
Lombardi, M. (2007). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative.
Loughran, J., & Hamilton, M. (Eds.). (2016). International Handbook of Teacher Education. Singapore: Springer.
Mantei, J., & Kervin, L. (2009). "Authentic" learning experiences: what does this mean and where is the literacy learning? In A. Moult (Ed.), National for Teachers of Education and Literacy (pp. 1-16). Hobart, Australia: Research Online, University of Wollongong.
Marphatia, A., Legault, E., Edge, K., & Archer, D. (2010). The role of teachers in improving learning in Burundi, Malawi, Senegal and Uganda: great expectations, little support. London: Institute of Education and Action Aid.
Ministry of Education and Sports. (2019). The National Teacher Policy. Kampala: Ministry of Education and Sports.
National Institute of Education. (2009). A teacher education model for the 21st century. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Ramakrishna, A., & Rama Devi, N. (2020). Principles of Effective Pedagogy. Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology, 90-104.
Stauffer, B. (2020, March 19th). Applied Education systems. Retrieved from What Are 21st Century Skills?: https://www.aeseducation.com/blog/what-are-21st-century-skills
True, M. (2016). Starting and maintaining a quality internship program. University of Virginia.
UNESCO. (2015, 19-22 May Tuesday-Friday). World Education Forum 2015. Retrieved from http://en.unesco.org/world-education-forum-2015/5-key-themes/quality-education
UNESCO. (2020). Distance Learning Solutions. Paris: UNESCO.
UNICEF. (2000, June). Defining Quality in Education. A paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of the International Working Group on Education . Florence, Italy: UNICEF.
UWEZO. (2010). Are our children learning? Annual Learning Assessment Report, Uganda. Kampala: Uwezo.net.
Western Sydney University. (2018). Partnership Pedagogy. Sydney: Western Sydney University.
Westhuizen, C. (2010). Development of facilitation skills. In L. Louw, & E. Toit (Eds.), Help, I am a student teacher! Skills development for teaching practice (pp. 51-70). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Walimbwa, Arthur Mugisha, Alfred Buluma, Julius Mbulankende
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
