Building Bridges into the Future: An Evaluation of Stakeholders’ Perceptions on the Actualisation of the Curriculum in Uganda’s Seed Secondary Schools

  • Alfred Buluma Makerere University
  • Charles Kyasanku Makerere University
  • John Kalule Makerere University
  • Julius Shopi Mbulankende Makerere University
  • Dorothy Kyagaba Sebbowa Makerere University
  • Muhammad Musoke Kiggundu Makerere University
Keywords: SEED Secondary Schools, Curriculum Implementation, Twenty-First Century Skills
Share Article:

Abstract

This study evaluates stakeholders’ perceptions of the actualisation of the formal, non-formal, as well as guidance and counselling curriculum in Uganda’s Seed secondary schools. Using a stratified four-stage cluster design, twelve Seed secondary schools, 630 students from senior three and four, and 93 teachers were randomly selected. Using purposive sampling, eight school administrators, four officials from the Directorate of Education Standards (DES), and 48 parents, were selected. Data collection was through administering interviews with school administrators and DES officials, conducting focus group discussions with teachers and parents, and self-administered questionnaires to students. A document review of institutional files and documents was done. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic coding and major themes emerged from the analysis; quantitative data was analysed using SPSS software. Findings on the actualisation of the formal curriculum show low levels of lesson preparations, teacher punctuality, parents’ monitoring of students learning, formative assessments, full-time teaching, equipped science laboratories, and the presence of computer laboratories, digital resources, and ICT teachers. Concerning the implementation of the non-formal curriculum, findings reveal inadequate time, facilities and equipment for co-curricular activities, several stakeholders managing discipline among students including prefects, disciplinary committees, parents, and the disciplinary committee of the board of governors, and poor medical care for students since the posted nurses abscond from duty. Lastly, concerning the implementation of guidance and counselling curriculum, findings indicate that several mechanisms like guidance and counselling programs, the existence of a career’s master/mistress, class visiting days are missing in most of the schools, and the psychosocial needs of students were not met. It is concluded that, to a large extent, a significant gap exists in the implementation of the official curriculum in seed secondary schools of Uganda. The study recommends the recruitment of more teachers on the government payroll in all seed secondary schools in the country. This will make teachers available at the school for consultation with students at all times. Construction and equipping of both science laboratories and computer laboratories in all seed secondary schools. Regular monitoring and close supervision of seed secondary schools by the relevant organs of the Ministry of Education and Sports should be effectively carried out. There is a need for the construction of staff houses at seed schools to maintain teacher presence for the effective implementation of non-formal curricular activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bategeka, L. & Okurut, N. (2005). Policy Brief 10: Universal Primary Education Uganda. Kampala: Overseas Development Institute. Available: http://cdn- odi- productions3- website- eu- west- 1.amazonaws.com/media/documents/4072.pdf.

Buluma, A. Ezati, A. B. Najjuma, R. & Nabiccu, S. (2018). Teacher Trainees’ Perceptions of the 21st Century Life Skills Developed as They Pursue Undergraduate Teacher Education Programs in Uganda: A Case Study of Makerere University. International Journal of Advanced Research and Seedations (IJARP), 2(10), 2327. http://www.ijarp.org/online-papers-publishing/oct2018.html,

Curriculum Review Report on Lower Secondary Education (2016). The Belgian Development Cooperation.

ISER. (2019). Status of Implementation of SDG4 on Education: Is Uganda on Track?

Leithwood, K., Seashore, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning.

Lippman, L. H., Ryberg, R., Carney, R., & Moore, K. A. (2015). Workforce Connections: Key “soft skills” that foster youth workforce success: toward a consensus across fields. Washington, DC: Child Trends.

Mlaba, K. (2021). Poverty, Inequality and Looting: Everything You Need to Know About South Africa’s Protests. Available: https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/everything-you-need-to-know-south-africa-protests/

Ministry of Education and Sports. (2017). Education and Sports Sector Strategic Plan 2017/18 - 2019/20.

Mwesigye, A. (2015). The advent of universal primary education (UPE) in Uganda: challenges and possible solutions. Journal of Educational Research and Studies 3(1), pp. 1-12, January, 2015State of Education in Africa Report. (2015). A report card on the Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges Confronting the African Education Sector. The African America Institute (AAI).

The Open University. (2020). Exploring innovative assessment methods. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/education-development/exploring-innovative-assessment-methods/content-section-overview.

Tucker, M. S., & Codding, J. B. (1998). Standards for Our Schools: How To Set Them, Measure Them, and Reach Them. Jossey-Bass Inc., 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741 (hardback: ISBN-0-7879-3894-7, $27; paperback: ISBN-0-7879-6428-X; $20).

UBOS. (2018). 2018 Statistical Abstract.

Vhumbunu, C. H. (2021). The July 2021 Protests and Socio-Political Unrest in South Africa: Reflecting on the Causes, Consequences and Future Lessons. Conflict Trends, 2021(3), 3-13.

Published
9 December, 2022
How to Cite
Buluma, A., Kyasanku, C., Kalule, J., Mbulankende, J., Sebbowa, D., & Kiggundu, M. (2022). Building Bridges into the Future: An Evaluation of Stakeholders’ Perceptions on the Actualisation of the Curriculum in Uganda’s Seed Secondary Schools. East African Journal of Education Studies, 5(4), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.5.4.1001