Strategic Mobility Plan for Employees of Coolwood SA Company
Abstract
In contemporary business environments, effective management of employee mobility has become paramount for companies striving to maintain competitiveness and sustainability. Neglecting to develop suitable mobility strategies can result in decreased productivity, increased operational costs, and environmental concerns, jeopardising a company's long-term success. Coolwood SA, a middle-sized furniture production company, is planning to relocate its headquarters from Maastricht to Hasselt by 2030, necessitating the design of a sustainable and cost-efficient mobility plan for its employees. This study aims to address this challenge by crafting a tailored mobility strategy that facilitates a seamless transition to the new headquarters. Drawing on insights from literature and empirical research, this study emphasises the importance of effective mobility planning in enhancing employee satisfaction, productivity, and operational efficiency while reducing environmental impact and costs. By analysing employee profiles, mobility measures, and various scenarios, the study identifies the most suitable mobility strategy for Coolwood SA. Through rigorous cost calculations and scenario comparisons, Scenario Two emerges as the most favourable option, offering significant cost reductions and accommodating employees' diverse needs and preferences. The study's findings underscore the importance of strategic and personalised mobility planning for companies undergoing relocation or expansion. By considering factors such as employee profiles, transportation modes, and cost implications, organisations can optimise decision-making and ensure a smooth transition to new locations while promoting long-term economic success and sustainability. This research provides valuable insights and recommendations for Coolwood SA and other companies navigating similar mobility challenges, highlighting the critical role of mobility planning in achieving organisational objectives and fostering employee well-being.
Downloads
References
Aertsens, J., Geus, B. De, Vandenbulcke, G., Degraeuwe, B., Broekx, S., Nocker, L. De, Liekens, I., Mayeres, I., Meeusen, R., Thomas, I., Torfs, R., Willems, H., & Int, L. (2010). Commuting by bike in Belgium, the costs of minor accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(6), 2149–2157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.008
Beis, D. for. (2019). 2019 UK greenhouse gas emissions, provisional figures. National Statistics, March, 46. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment _data/file/790626/2018-provisional-emissions-statistics-report.pdf
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218.
Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2012). Demand for public transport in Germany and the USA: an analysis of rider characteristics. Transport Reviews, 32(5), 541–567.
Chiu Chuen, O., Karim, M. R., & Yusoff, S. (2014). Mode choice between private and public transport in Klang Valley, Malaysia. The Scientific World Journal, 2014(Figure 1), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/394587
Climate Change Committee. (2020). Reducing UK emissions: Progress Report to Parliament. Progress Report to UK Parliament, July, 93. https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/reducing-uk-emissions-2019-progress-report-to-parliament/%0Awww.theccc.org.uk/publications
Dickinson, J. E., Kingham, S., Copsey, S., & Pearlman Hougie, D. J. (2003). Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: Will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 8(1), 53– 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00018-4
Enoch, M., & Potter, S. (2003). Encouraging the commercial sector to help employees to change their travel behaviour. Transport Policy, 10(1), 51– 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00029-X
EPA. (2020). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks, 1990 to 2020. EPA Report.
Fyhri, A., & Fearnley, N. (2023). Effects of e-bikes on bicycle use and mode share. Transportation Research Part D, 36(2015), 45– 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.005
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524.
Global Workplace Analytics. (2021). The Business Case for Remote Work 2021 Report.
Hoehner, C. M., Barlow, C. E., Allen, P., & Schootman, M. (2012). Commuting distance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and metabolic risk. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(6), 571–578.
International Energy Agency. (2020). Global EV Outlook 2020: Technology Report. Global EV Outlook 2020: Technology Report, June, 39–85.
McKinsey & Company. (2020). The state of fashion, McKinsey. McKinsey & Company, 63(12), 42–43.
Nelson, N. M., Foley, E., Gorman, D. J. O., Moyna, N. M., & Woods, C. B. (2008). Active commuting to school: How far is too far? 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-Received
OECD. (2002). Road Travel Demand. Road Travel Demand. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264175518-en
Paladugula, A. L., & Rathi, S. (2013). Strategies to Reduce Energy Use for Commuting by Employees. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 952–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.190
Peer, S. (2019).To bike or not to bike? – Evidence from a university relocation. Transportation Research Part D, 70(March), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.03.003
Shaheen, S. A., Cohen, A. P., & Chung, M. S. (2009). North American carsharing: 10-year retrospective. Transportation Research Record, 2110(1), 35–44.
Soder, M., & Peer, S. (2018). The potential role of employers in promoting sustainable mobility in rural areas: Evidence from Eastern Austria*. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(7), 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1402974
Sutton-Parker, J. (2021). Determining commuting greenhouse gas emissions abatement achieved by information technology-enabled remote working. Procedia Computer Science, 191, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.037
Team, R. C. (2019). European Environment Agency. 2019.
Vale, D. S. (2013). Does commuting time tolerance impede sustainable urban mobility? Analysing the impacts on commuting behaviour as a result of workplace relocation to a mixed-use centre in Lisbon. Journal of Transport Geography, 32, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.003
Van Malderen, L., Jourquin, B., Thomas, I., Vanoutrive, T., Verhetsel, A., & Witlox, F. (2012). On the mobility policies of companies: What are the good practices? The Belgian case. Transport Policy, 21, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.12.005
Vanoutrive, T., Van De Vijver, E., Van Malderen, L., Jourquin, B., Thomas, I., Verhetsel, A., & Witlox, F. (2012). What determines carpooling to workplaces in Belgium: Location, organisation, or promotion? Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.006
Copyright (c) 2024 Tukashaba Shafan, Shingiro Clement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
