Strategic Transportation Planning: Soft Mobility Network Planning Technical Report
Abstract
This technical report presents a comprehensive approach to soft mobility network planning, focusing on assessing the potential for growth in bicycle infrastructure. Utilizing GIS-based analysis and multi-criteria decision-making, the study aims to identify and prioritize areas for new bike infrastructure development. The methodology involved defining influential factors, selecting variables from available datasets, assigning value levels, weighting parameters, and generating cycling infrastructure potential maps. Factors such as connectivity, safety, and attractiveness are considered, with each variable assessed and scored based on current conditions and ideal benchmarks. The results highlight high-potential areas for infrastructure improvement and propose desired lines to enhance the existing network. Limitations of the study, including data currency and grid dimensions, are acknowledged, suggesting avenues for future research and improvement. Overall, the study underscores the importance of integrated planning approaches and the utilization of spatial analysis tools in promoting cycling as a sustainable and accessible mode of transportation
Downloads
References
Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga, A. M., González, V. I., & Henao, C. A. (2020). Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, 310– 334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.010
Bertolini, L., Binkhorst, G. J., Burden, D., Eind, A., Huismans, G., Immers, B., Vuchic, V. R., & Walraad, A. (2006). Urban design and traffic–a selection from Bachs toolbox. CROW, Ede.
Cartolano, P. P., Vold, H., & Straten, E. (2022). 2021 Pan European Road Network Performance Report CEDR Working Group Performance of Road Network October 2022 (Issue October).
Hartanto, K. (2017). Developing a bikeability index to enable the assessment of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) nodes: case study in Arnhem-Nijmegen region, Netherlands. http://essay.utwente.nl/83741/
Ignatia, J. (2017). Design manual for bicycle traffic. Delft, Crow.
Krenn, P. J., Oja, P., & Titze, S. (2015). Development of a bikeability index to assess the bicycle-friendliness of urban environments. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 5(4), 451–459.
Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities, 4(1), 93–111.
Riehle, E. R. (2016). How to plan and develop a pedestrian and cycling network-Basis for the Development of a NMT Strategy for Windhoek. Retrieved July, 15, 2020.
Urbanczyk, R. (2010). PRESTO Cycling Policy Guide. Promotion of cycling.
Verwee, I., & Daniels, S. (2022). CEDR Call 2016 Safety End of Programme Report (Issue July).
Winters, M., Davidson, G., Kao, D., & Teschke, K. (2011). Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride. Transportation, 38, 153–168.
Zhao, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, N., Wong, Y. D., Zhou, Y., & Meng, M. (2021). A GIS-CA model for planning bikeways upon the footpath network. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168926
Żochowska, R., Jacyna, M., Kłos, M. J., & Soczówka, P. (2021). A GIS-based method of the assessment of spatial integration of bike-sharing stations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073894
Copyright (c) 2024 Tukashaba Shafan, Shingiro Clement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
