Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of UHPC in Modern Construction Practices
Ikisiri
A comprehensive examination was undertaken to investigate various aspects related to the development and application of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC). The research explored eco-friendly approaches, such as incorporating supplementary cementitious materials and nanoparticles, optimizing binder systems, and assessing chemical activators. These modifications improved mechanical properties and reduced environmental impact, including embodied CO2 emissions. Additionally, the utilization of waste materials like CRT glass showed energy savings and reduced emissions. Studies focused on optimizing UHPC mix designs, emphasizing a balance between performance and environmental impact. Techniques like statistical mixture design methods and dynamic testing assessed UHPC's environmental and economic impacts, highlighting significant energy savings and reduced CO2 emissions with waste material recycling. Overall, the research contributes valuable insights into UHPC development and its ecological footprint in construction
Upakuaji
Marejeleo
K. C. Onyelowe et al., “Optimal compressive strength of RHA ultra-high-performance lightweight concrete (UHPLC) and its environmental performance using life cycle assessment,” Civ. Eng. J., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2391–2410, 2022.
J. N. Wang et al., “A novel design of low carbon footprint Ultra-HighPerformance Concrete (UHPC) based on full scale recycling of gold tailings,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 304, p. 124664, 2021.
J. Esmaeili and A. O. AL-Mwanes, “Production of eco-friendly UHPC with high durability and resistance to harsh environmental conditions using copper mine tailings,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 76, p. 107297, 2023.
Y. Sun et al., “Development of a novel eco-efficient LC2 conceptual cement based ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) incorporating limestone powder and calcined clay tailings: Design and performances,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 315, p. 128236, 2021.
Y. Li et al., “A comparative study on mechanical properties and environmental impact of UHPC with belite cement and portland cement,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 380, no. P1, p. 135003, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135003.
H. S. Müller, M. Haist, and M. Vogel, “Assessment of the sustainability potential of concrete and concrete structures considering their environmental impact, performance and lifetime,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 67, no. PART C, pp. 321–337, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.039.
H. S. Müllera, R. Breinera, J. S. Moffatta, and M. Haista, “Design and properties of sustainable concrete,” Procedia Eng., vol. 95, no. Scescm, pp. 290–304, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.189.
N. Randl, T. Steiner, S. Ofner, E. Baumgartner, and T. Mészöly, “Development of UHPC mixtures from an ecological point of view,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 67, no. PART C, pp. 373–378, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.102.
Y. Shi, G. Long, C. Ma, Y. Xie, and J. He, “Design and preparation of ultra-high-performance concrete with low environmental impact,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 214, pp. 633–643, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.318.
R. Yu, P. Spiesz, and H. J. H. Brouwers, “Development of an eco-friendly Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) with efficient cement and mineral admixtures uses,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 55, pp. 383–394, 2015.
R. Yang et al., “Environmental and economical friendly ultra-high performance-concrete incorporating appropriate quarry-stone powders,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 260, p. 121112, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121112.
M. Aqel and D. K. Panesar, “Hydration kinetics and compressive strength of steam-cured cement pastes and mortars containing limestone filler,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 113, pp. 359–368, 2016.
M. B. Ali, R. Saidur, and M. S. Hossain, “A review on emission analysis in cement industries,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2252–2261, 2011.
E. Ghafari, H. Costa, and E. Júlio, “Statistical mixture design approach for eco-efficient UHPC,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 55, pp. 17–25, 2015.
E. Ghafari, H. Costa, and E. Júlio, “Critical review on eco-efficient ultra high-performance concrete enhanced with nanomaterials,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 101, pp. 201– 208, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.066.
K. C. Onyelowe et al., “Optimal Compressive Strength of RHA Ultra-High-Performance Lightweight Concrete (UHPLC) and Its Environmental Performance Using Life Cycle Assessment,” Civ. Eng. J., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2391–2410, 2022, doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-11-03.
A. M. Tahwia, G. M. Elgendy, and M. Amin, “Durability and microstructure of eco-efficient ultra-high-performance concrete,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 303, no. May, p. 124491, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124491.
D. Fan et al., “A new development of eco-friendly Ultra-High-performance concrete (UHPC): Towards efficient steel slag application and multi-objective optimization,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 306, no. September, p. 124913, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124913.
I. Ferdosian and A. Camões, “Eco-efficient ultra-high performance concrete development by means of response surface methodology,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 84, pp. 146–156, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.08.019.
H. Chu, F. Wang, L. Wang, T. Feng, and D. Wang, “Mechanical properties and environmental evaluation of ultra-high-performance concrete with aeolian sand,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 14, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ma13143148.
Y. Dong, “Performance assessment and design of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) structures incorporating life-cycle cost and environmental impacts,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 167, pp. 414–425, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.037.
H. Sameer, V. Weber, C. Mostert, S. Bringezu, E. Fehling, and A. Wetzel, “Environmental assessment of ultra-high-performance concrete using carbon, material, and water footprint,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 6, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ma12060851.
M. Amran, G. Murali, N. Makul, W. C. Tang, and A. Eid Alluqmani, “Sustainable development of eco-friendly ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC): Cost, carbon emission, and structural ductility,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 398, no. December 2022, p. 132477, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132477.
M. Abdellatief, M. A. Elrahman, A. A. Abadel, M. Wasim, and A. Tahwia, “Ultra-high-performance concrete versus ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete: Mechanical performance, microstructure, and ecological assessment,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 79, no. September, p. 107835, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107835.
M. Abdellatief, M. Abd Elrahman, G. Elgendy, G. Bassioni, and A. M. Tahwia, “Response surface methodology-based modelling and optimization of sustainable UHPC containing ultrafine fly ash and metakaolin,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 388, p. 131696, 2023.
H. Castillo et al., “Factors affecting the compressive strength of geopolymers: A review,” Minerals, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 1317, 2021.
Y. Shi, G. Long, X. Zeng, Y. Xie, and H. Wang, “Green ultra-high-performance concrete with very low cement content,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 303, no. October 2020, p. 124482, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124482.
H. Wei, A. Zhou, T. Liu, D. Zou, and H. Jian, “Dynamic and environmental performance of eco-friendly ultra-high performance concrete containing waste cathode ray tube glass as a substitution of river sand,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 162, no. June, p. 105021, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105021.
N. Bertola, C. Küpfer, E. Kälin, and E. Brühwiler, “Assessment of the environmental impacts of bridge designs involving UHPFRC,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 22, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132212399.
T. Stengel and P. Schießl, Life cycle assessment (LCA) of ultra high-performance concrete (UHPC) structures. Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013. doi: 10.1533/9780857097729.3.528.
Copyright (c) 2024 Tukashaba Shafan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
