Teachers' Perceptions of the Implementation of Group Learning in Selected Primary Schools in Uganda
Abstract
This study explores teachers' perceptions regarding the implementation of group learning pedagogy in primary schools in Uganda, guided by Vygotsky’s Social Constructivist Theory, Bandura’s Social Learning Theory, and Piaget’s Constructivist Theory. A qualitative exploratory case study design was employed, utilizing interviews, lesson observations, and lesson plan analyses to gather comprehensive insights from eight teachers across both government-aided and private primary schools. The research reveals that while teachers recognize the pedagogical value of group learning, their implementation approaches are significantly influenced by contextual constraints and personal beliefs about effective instruction. Teachers reported employing diverse implementation approaches; with scaffold group tasks emerging as the most consistently used implementation approach due to its perceived effectiveness in addressing academic diversity and promoting conceptual mastery. However, more interactive approaches like role-play scenarios saw limited adoption, primarily due to perceived time constraints and doubts about their academic relevance. The findings highlight a complex interplay between teacher intentions and classroom realities. Teachers emphasized goals of inclusive participation and peer-assisted learning, yet faced challenges in managing diverse learner abilities, group dynamics, and resource limitations. Notably, implementation varied across subjects, with science classes demonstrating more comprehensive facilitation due to the natural alignment between collaborative learning and inquiry-based approaches. A gap emerged between teachers' recognition of group learning's social benefits and their actual classroom practices, which often prioritized academic outcomes over the development of collaborative skills. Teachers also lacked training in teaching collaborative skills, and schools provided little support for teachers to use group learning in different subjects and classes. These insights underscore the need for targeted professional development that addresses both the pedagogical and practical dimensions of group learning implementation. Recommendations include context-sensitive training programs to enhance teachers' group implementation skills, school-level support for collaborative learning environments, and further research to explore sustainable implementation models for resource-constrained settings. The study contributes to ongoing discussions about adapting learner-centred pedagogies in primary education systems facing significant structural challenges
Downloads
References
Allan, J. (2017). An analysis of Albert Bandura's aggression: A social learning analysis. CRC Press.
Amankwaa, L. (2016). Creating protocols for trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of cultural diversity, 23(3).
Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Webster, R. (2022). Group work and collaborative learning in primary classrooms: Designing for change. Routledge.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 13(2), 201-216.
Brown, P. L., Concannon, J. P., Marx, D., Donaldson, C., & Black, A. (2019). An examination of middle school learners' STEM self-efficacy, interests and perceptions. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 17(3).
Care, E., Kim, H., Anderson, K., & Gustafsson-Wright, E. (2017). Skills for a Changing World: National Perspectives and the Global Movement. Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution.
Chaudhry, M. A., Kocabaş, Ö., & Yılmaz, K. (2023). Contextual challenges to implementing cooperative learning in developing countries: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 98, 102742.
Christian, K. B., Kelly, A. M., & Bugallo, M. F. (2021). NGSS-based teacher professional development to implement engineering practices in STEM instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-18.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8-16.
Eun, B. (2019). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18-30.
Farine, D. R., & Whitehead, H. (2015). Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis. Journal of animal ecology, 84(5), 1144-1163.
Galukande, M., Katamba, A., Kiguli, S., Kiguli-Malwadde, E., Kijjambu, S., & Sewankambo, N. (2015). Problem based learning: tutors’ views 5 years after implementation at a sub-Saharan University. African Health Sciences, 15(1), 261-268.
Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2020). Fostering complex problem solving for diverse learners: Engaging an ethos of intentionality toward equitable access. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 679-702.
Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Systematic Literature review on the elements of metacognition-based Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) teaching and learning modules. Sustainability, 14(2), 813.
Hart, C. S., & Brando, N. (2018). A capability approach to children's well‐being, agency and participatory rights in education. European Journal of Education, 53(3), 293-309.
Johnson, D. W., & Smith, R. T. (2019). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. Active learning Beyond the future, 59-71.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (2019). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational psychology review, 19, 15-29.
Johnson, D. W., & Smith, R. A. (2019). The role of resources in effective group learning environments. International Journal of Collaborative Education, 12(2), 89–102.
Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2019). Teacher competencies for the implementation of group learning in the classroom: A framework and research review. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 505-536.
Kelly, M., Dowling, M., & Millar, M. (2018). The search for understanding: The role of paradigms. Nurse researcher, 25(4), 9-13.
Kiggundu, M., Musisi, B., & Kiwewesi, A. N. (2023). Empowered school environment for effective learning in Uganda’s Muslim founded primary schools. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 6(2), 100-121.
Kisembo, H. N., Malumba, R., Nsereko, E. K., Babirye, D., Nassanga, R., Ameda, F., ... & Kawooya, M. G. (2023). Computed tomography requisitions among children and young adults in sub-Saharan Africa: are we doing it right?.
Kwarikunda, D., Schiefele, U., Muwonge, C. M., & Ssenyonga, J. (2022). Profiles of learners based on their cognitive and metacognitive learning strategy use: occurrence and relations with gender, intrinsic motivation, and perceived autonomy support. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1-12.
Lamm, A. J., Shoulders, C., Roberts, T. G., Irani, T. A., Snyder, L. J. U., & Brendemuhl, J. (2013). The Influence of Cognitive Diversity on Group Problem Solving Strategy. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(1), 18-30.
Mavuru, L., & Ramnarain, U. (2020). Teachers' knowledge and views on the use of learners' socio-cultural context in teaching natural sciences. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 955-971.
Mendoza, M., & Heymann, J. (2022). Implementation of inclusive education: a systematic review of studies of inclusive education interventions in low-and lower-middle-income countries. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1-18.
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Ministry of Education and Sports. (2017). The Gender in Education Policy. Kampala, Uganda: Government of Uganda.
Ministry of Education and Sports. (2019). National Teacher Policy. Kampala, Uganda: Government of Uganda.
Ministry of Education and Sports. (2020). Uganda National Education Accounts Report. Kampala, Uganda: Government of Uganda.
Ministry of Education and Sports (MoES). (2021). Education sector strategic plan 2021-2025. Government of Uganda. https://www.education.go.ug
National Curriculum Development Centre (NCDC). (2022). The revised primary school curriculum framework. Ministry of Education and Sports, Republic of Uganda. https://www.ncdc.go.ug
Ofei-Manu, P., & Didham, R. J. (2018). Identifying the factors for sustainability learning performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1173-1184.
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman.
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., ... & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity, 52, 1893-1907.
Skillman, M., Cross-Barnet, C., Friedman Singer, R., Rotondo, C., Ruiz, S., & Moiduddin, A. (2019). A framework for rigorous qualitative research as a component of mixed method rapid-cycle evaluation. Qualitative Health Research, 29(2), 279-289.
Smith, J., Johnson, A., & Williams, R. (2020). The significance of obtaining guardian consent for children's participation in research activities. Journal of Child Psychology, 25(3), 123-135.
Simon, K. D. (2022). Quality of National Curriculum and Learner Learning: The case of thematic curriculum in Uganda.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2018). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(3), 228-260.
Zajda, J., & Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(4), 400–412.
Copyright (c) 2025 Gloria Geria, Joyce Ayikoru Asiimwe, PhD, Elizabeth Opit, PhD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.