Child-to-Child Methodologies for Inclusive Learning in Government Primary Schools in Uganda

  • Gloria Geria Kyambogo University
Keywords: Child-to-Child Methodologies, Inclusive Education, Peer Learning, Primary Education, Teacher Practices, Uganda
Share Article:

Abstract

This study investigates how Child-to-Child methodologies promote inclusive learning in government primary schools of Adjumani District in Uganda, guided by Vygotsky's Social Constructivist Theory and Rawls' Social Justice Theory. A qualitative exploratory case study design was employed, utilising classroom observations, interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis of lesson plans and schemes of work to gather comprehensive insights from teachers and learners. Findings indicate that teachers primarily utilise cooperative learning and mixed-ability grouping strategies to foster peer collaboration and support diverse learners. However, the study identified significant challenges in implementation, including inconsistent methodology application across subjects, inadequate adaptation for learners with special needs, and a disconnect between lesson planning and classroom practice. These barriers were compounded by large class sizes and resource constraints, limiting the potential of Child-to-Child approaches to achieve inclusive education goals. The study contributes to inclusive education discussion by revealing how contextual factors influence the effectiveness of peer-learning strategies in refugee-hosting primary schools. Key findings highlight disparities between policy aspirations and classroom realities, particularly regarding teacher preparedness and systemic support structures. The research emphasises the need for enhanced teacher professional development focused on practical, context-specific implementation of Child-to-Child methodologies, improved lesson planning integration, and stronger school-based support systems. Recommendations include developing exemplary lesson plans that demonstrate progressive integration of peer-learning skills, establishing peer mentoring networks among teachers, and advocating for policy adjustments to address structural barriers. Future research should investigate the long-term impacts of these methodologies on both academic and social outcomes for diverse learners, assess their effectiveness across different educational contexts, and examine cultural factors in peer-learning dynamics. Addressing these gaps will inform evidence-based practices and policy decisions to optimise inclusive education through Child-to-Child approaches in primary schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E. B., & Waitoller, F. R. (2011). Inclusive education: Examining equity on five continents. Harvard Education Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2017). Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments. Applied Measurement in Education, 30(4), 250–264.

César, M., & Santos, N. (2006). From exclusion to inclusion: Collaborative work contributions to more inclusive learning settings. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(3), 333-346.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Drajo, V. (2017). Pedagogical innovations in Ugandan primary schools. Kyambogo University Press.

Dryden-Peterson, S. (2023). Right where we belong: How refugee teachers and students are changing the future of education. Harvard University Press.

Dryden-Peterson, S. (2003). Education in refugee contexts: Models for quality provision. UNESCO.

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2017). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813-828.

Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers' reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 933-940.

Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2011). How can we enhance enjoyment of secondary school? Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 351-365.

Gundumogula, M. (2021). Understanding learner perspectives in Ugandan primary schools. Fountain Publishers.

Harland, T. (2003). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and problem-based learning: Linking a theoretical concept with practice through action research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 263–272.

Keitany, J. J., & Kiprop, C. J. (2020). Teacher professional development and implementation of learner-centered pedagogy in Kenya. Journal of Pedagogy and Educational Research, 3(1), 45–60.

Kempen, M., & Steyn, G. M. (2016). Continuous professional development for teachers in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 36(4), 1-9.

Kinyara, A. (2019). Inclusive education practices in Northern Uganda. Makerere University Press.

Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2015). Teaching learning strategies. Learning and Instruction, 35, 1-10.

Kwesiga, J. C. (2021). Teacher professional development in Uganda. Fountain Publishers.

Lambrecht, J. (2020). Inclusive education in Uganda: A focus on disability and policy implementation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo). DUO Research Archive.

Marlina, M., Hendrawati, E., & Kusumastuti, D. (2019). Teachers' attitudes toward inclusive education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(1), 36-44.

Marzouki, M., Idrissi, M. K., & Bennani, S. (2017). Social constructivism in Moroccan classrooms. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(1), 101-108.

Mendoza, P., & Heymann, J. (2022). Education policy in developing countries. Routledge.

Musingafi, M. C., Mhute, I., Zebron, S., & Kaseke, K. E. (2015). Planning to teach. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21), 54-60.

Nesari, A. J., & Heidari, M. (2014). The important role of lesson plan. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 2(5), 27-34.

O'Brien, N. (2015). Students' perceptions of teaching. Irish Educational Studies, 34(1), 43-57.

Rahman, M. M., Seraj, P. M., Hasan, M. K., Namaziandost, E., & Tilwani, S. A. (2019). Bangladeshi students' attitudes. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3), 126-137.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.

Schreiber, J. B., & Valle, B. E. (2013). Social constructivist teaching strategies. The Qualitative Report, 18(24), 1-23.

Talmor, R., & Feigin, N. (2005). Factors related to teacher implementation. Teacher Development, 9(3), 381-390.

Terzi, L. (2005). Beyond the dilemma of difference. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(3), 443-456.

Tromp, B., & Datzberger, S. (2019). Child-to-Child methodology as a means to improve refugee children’s inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(6), 593–607.

Tromp, J., & Datzberger, S. (2021). Inclusive education in refugee settings. Education Above All.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education. UNESCO.

UNICEF. (2016). Education in emergencies: Uganda case study. UNICEF.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wheeler, L. (2001). Professional development in developing countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 21(3), 207-216.

Young, K., & Luttenegger, K. (2014). Planning for differentiation. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(5), 192-196.

Published
20 July, 2025
How to Cite
Geria, G. (2025). Child-to-Child Methodologies for Inclusive Learning in Government Primary Schools in Uganda. East African Journal of Education Studies, 8(2), 1148-1160. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.8.2.3354