Teachers’ Perceived Challenges and the Uptake of E-Learning in Kampala Capital City
Abstract
This study investigated the challenges affecting teachers’ uptake of e-learning instruction in government-aided Universal Secondary Education (USE) schools in Kampala Capital City, Uganda. The objective was to examine the infrastructural, institutional, and personal factors that hindered teachers’ effective engagement with e-learning platforms. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the Technology-Mediated Learning (TML) frameworks, a convergent mixed-methods design was employed. The study population comprised 393 teachers and 10 headteachers from ten USE schools, all selected through a universal sampling strategy to ensure representativeness. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations) and inferential tests (t-tests, ANOVA, chi-square, and multiple regression), while exploratory factor analysis (EFA) confirmed construct validity. Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis, following systematic stages of familiarisation, coding, and theme refinement. The results revealed that teachers faced numerous challenges affecting e-learning uptake. Quantitatively, unreliable electricity (M = 1.39, SD = 0.05), weak internet connectivity (M = 1.59, SD = 0.35), insufficient ICT equipment (M = 1.31, SD = 0.13), and limited technical support emerged as critical barriers. Regression analysis indicated that dependence on desktop-based teaching tools negatively influenced e-learning adoption (β = –0.134, p = 0.012), while lack of student access further constrained implementation (β = –0.119, p = 0.024). Qualitative findings reinforced these outcomes, highlighting funding inadequacies, irregular teacher training, inconsistent administrative support, and fragile maintenance systems as recurring obstacles. Headteachers also cited low motivation, absence of national e-learning policies, and erratic digital environments as institutional challenges. The study concluded that the barriers to e-learning uptake in USE schools are systemic, multifaceted, and structurally embedded within Uganda’s educational ecosystem. It recommends enhanced investment in digital infrastructure, sustainable funding frameworks, continuous professional development, and stronger administrative leadership to institutionalise e-learning practices. Empowering teacher collaboration networks and strengthening feedback systems were further advised to promote sustained technology-mediated instruction.
Downloads
References
Abbas, M., Khan, N., & Farooq, R. (2023). Designing representative samples in small educational populations: A methodological overview. Educational Research Review, 18(2), 145–159.
Ahmad, S., Mohd Noor, A. S., Alwan, A. A., Gulzar, Y., Khan, W. Z., & Reegu, F. A. (2023). eLearning acceptance and adoption challenges in higher education. Sustainability, 15(7), 6190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076190
Ahmed, R. E., Elhassan, R. M., Alkholi, A. A., Basheer, H. E., Gabu, E. I. A., Ibrahim, A. M., & Noureldeen, A. N. (2024). Implementing technology-mediated learning in universities to achieve Sustainable Development Goals: King Khalid University as a case study. Migration Letters, 21(3), 363–378.
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, 100662.
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051.
Ahmed, S. K. (2025). Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 5, 100171.
Al-Adwan, A. S., Meet, R. K., Anand, S., Shukla, G. P., Alsharif, R., & Dabbaghia, M. (2025). Understanding continuous use intention of technology among higher education teachers in emerging economy: Evidence from integrated TAM, TPACK, and UTAUT model. Studies in Higher Education, 50(3), 505–524.
Ali, R. (2025). How challenging? Barriers for teachers in institutional implementation of blended learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 40(3), 324–341.
Almusawi, H. A., & Durugbo, C. M. (2024). Linking Task–Technology Fit, innovativeness, and teacher readiness using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 14899–14928.
Al-Nuaimi, M. N., Al Sawafi, O. S., Malik, S. I., & Al-Maroof, R. S. (2024). Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to investigate determinants of acceptance and adoption of learning management systems in the post-pandemic era: A structural equation modeling approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(5), 1710–1736.
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Al-Adwan, A. S., Al-Maatouk, Q., Othman, M. S., Alsaud, A. R., Almogren, A. S., & Al-Rahmi, A. M. (2023). Integrating communication and Task–Technology Fit theories: The adoption of digital media in learning. Sustainability, 15(10), 8144.
Bada, J. K., Sewankambo, B., & Kasule, G. (2020). Instructors’ reflections on e-learning implementation at Makerere University. Makerere Journal of Higher Education, 12(2), 45–62.
Bai, Y., & Wang, S. (2025). Impact of generative AI interaction and output quality on university students’ learning outcomes: A technology-mediated and motivation-driven approach. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 24054.
Barikzai, A., Khan, T., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Challenges of integrating adaptive learning platforms in developing education systems. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(2), 112–130.
Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Teachers’ online learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7207–7224.
Bayag, A., & Madimabe, M. (2024). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model as means to maximise teacher collaboration in the indigenisation of mathematics pedagogy. South African Journal of Higher Education, 38(3), 46–63.
Beher, J., Treml, E., & Wintle, B. (2025). Group discussions improve reliability and validity of rated categories based on qualitative data from systematic review. PLoS One, 20(6), e0326166.
Bhushan, P., Sengupta, A., & Abraham, C. (2025). Technology-mediated learning in the workplace: Influence of personalization. Management Decision, 63(2), 344–361.
Bower, M. (2019). Technology‐mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035-1048.
Bygholm, A., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Tabo, G. O. (2025). Advances toward digital learning. In African Higher Education (pp. 221–234). Springer.
Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., Ayub, A. F., & Mahmud, R. (2017). Teachers' perceptions of e-learning in Malaysian secondary schools. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 20–33.
Chimbunde, T. (2023). Challenges of e-learning implementation in Zimbabwean higher education institutions. African Journal of Educational Studies, 15(1), 98–115.
Christou, P. (2025). Looking beyond numbers in qualitative research: From data saturation to data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 30(1), 3088–3100.
Chuang, L. M., & Liu, H. H. (2024). An exploration of key success factors for enterprises implementing online education training based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 14(2), 1–18.
Downes, S. (2005). An introduction to connective knowledge. In T. Hug (Ed.), Media, knowledge & education: Exploring new spaces, relations and dynamics in digital media ecologies (pp. 77–102). Innsbruck University Press.
Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2022). Using digital technology to improve learning: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Computers & Education, 178, 104385.
Fàbregues, S., & Guetterman, T. C. (2025). Mixed methods research systematic methodological reviews Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 19(1), 6–17.
Forero, R., Nahidi, S., De Costa, J., Mohsin, M., Fitzgerald, G., Gibson, N., McCarthy, S., & Aboagye-Sarfo, P. (2018). Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour in qualitative research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 30(4), 291–296.
Gitiha, R. W., Rugano, P., Wakhu, S., & Muriithi, C. G. (2024). Students’ perceptions towards the uptake of educational technologies in Christian Religious Education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2310968.
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS One, 15(5), e0232076.
Haq, M., & Yasin, N. (2025). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodology paradigms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 6(6), 1–15.
Hasan, A., Raghuwanshi, S., Harsora, H., Kumar, P., Gupta, V., & Singh, A. S. (2025). E-learning adoption among millennials: Behavioural intentions and the extended UTAUT model. Discover Education, 4(1), 400.
Hayashi, P., Abib, G., & Hoppen, N. (2021). Validating qualitative research: A process for verification. Qualitative Report, 26(2), 375–388.
Hennink, M. M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical studies. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(2), 797–824.
Honigsberg, S., Watkowski, L., & Drechsler, A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Mediating learning for literacy development. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 56(1), 35–50.
Huang, L., Zan, J., Lv, K., & Zhao, X. (2025). A systematic review of mixed methods research in tourism and hospitality. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 63, 163–176.
Im, E. O., Lee, Y. H., & Chee, W. (2023). Thematic analysis: Conceptual clarification, challenges, and recommendations. Qualitative Health Research, 33(8), 1235–1248.
Jevsikova, T., Stupurienė, G., Stumbrienė, D., Juškevičienė, A., & Dagienė, V. (2021). Acceptance of distance learning technologies by teachers: Determining factors and emergency state influence. Informatica, 32(3), 517–542. Kelkay, J. M., Wubante, S. M., Anteneh, D. S.,
Kagoma, P., Mongi, R., & Kalolo, A. (2025). Exploratory mixed-methods analysis of the determinants of use of health research evidence among planning teams in Tanzania. BMJ Open, 15(10), e099692.
Kamal, A., Malik, R., & Hussain, M. (2022). Exploratory factor analysis in social science research: Concepts and applications. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(4), 621–636.
Kamalloo, L., Kundu, P., & Wanjiku, R. (2022). Universal sampling and representativeness in small educational populations. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 14(3), 201–215.
Kelkay, J. M., Wubante, S. M., Anteneh, D. S., Takilo, M. K., Gebeyehu, C. D., Alameraw, T. A., & Gashu, K. D. (2025). Intention to use eLearning-based continuing professional development and its predictors among healthcare professionals in Amhara region referral hospitals, Ethiopia, 2023: using modified UTAUT-2 model. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1), 178.
Kisanjara, S. B., Abeka, S., & Mwalongo, A. (2019). Challenges of adopting e-learning systems in Tanzanian universities. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 15(2), 124–140.
Kituyi, G. M., Abaho, E., Aguma, D., Nkambwe, I., & Beronda, J. (2025). Improving access to communication services by the unserved and underserved communities in Uganda through information and communication technologies. Universal Access in the Information Society, 24(2), 1873-1882.Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229.
Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, 1st ed., Sage Publications Inc, Newbury Park.
Lopes, C., Ugochukwu, N., & Eze, S. (2023). Barriers to e-learning adoption in Nigerian higher education: Insights from teacher reflections. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 6213–6231.
Madadizadeh, F., & Bahariniya, S. (2023). Tutorial on how to calculating content validity of scales in medical research. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 31, 100315.
Masagazi, M., Tumusiime, M., & Nkata, J. (2024). Thematic analysis in educational research: Methodological reflections from Ugandan contexts. African Journal of Education and Practice, 10(1), 55–72.
Matete, J., Mugenyi, R., & Kaggwa, M. (2023). Internet stability and e-learning continuity in East African universities. Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 8(1), 112–128.
Mattick, K., Johnston, J., & de la Croix, A. (2018). How to ensure qualitative research is credible and trustworthy. BMJ, 363, k3823.
Maune, A. (2023). Institutional barriers to technology-enhanced learning in Zimbabwean universities. African Journal of Educational Management, 17(1), 55–70.
Mekheimer, M. (2025). Technological self-efficacy, motivation, and contextual factors in advanced EFL e-learning: A mixed-methods study of strategy use and satisfaction. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–18.
Mohamad Mozie, N., Ghazali, N., & Ali Husin, L. I. (2025). Adopting artificial intelligence in higher education: Insights from the UTAUT framework on student intentions. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 11(1), 71–79.
Mpofu, F. Y. (2025). The saturation dilemma reconsidered: Role, challenges, and controversies for qualitative research in the digital era. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069251348542.
Mutalemwa, D. K., Issa, F., & Mwashambwa, M. G. (2024). Determinants, Awareness, and Perceptions of COVID-19 Vaccination among Youth in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(1), 146-156.
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2024). Demystification and actualisation of data saturation in qualitative research through thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241229777.
Nattamai Kannan, K. B., & Taylor, W. (2024). Limits to the adoption of Technology-Mediated Learning: A comparative empirical analysis of digital and non-digital supplemental learning products. SMU Cox School of Business Research Paper (23–02).
Oulamine, Z., Cherkaoui, S., & Berrada, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for adaptive learning systems in Africa. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 455–472.
Parkinson, J., & Davey, J. (2025). Research credibility through methodological transparency in health marketing. Health Marketing Quarterly, 42(1), 1–6.
Partridge, R. (2023). ICT infrastructure for educational equity: Evaluating Uganda’s UCUSAF Programme. Journal of African Digital Policy, 8(2), 101–119.
Pavlou, V., & Burke, K. (2025). Understanding technology acceptance towards online creative arts learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 162, 105085.
Pires, M. D. C. C. M., Barbieri-Figueiredo, M. D. C. A., Cardoso, D. F. B., Duque, F. M., Tricas-Sauras, M. S., Prosen, M., & Menino, E. G. (2025). Technology-mediated training programs for school health teams on special health care needs: A scoping review. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 59, e20240328.
Renjith, V., Yesodharan, R., Noronha, J. A., Ladd, E., & George, A. (2021). Qualitative methods in health research: One size does not fit all. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 796–881.
Riofrío-Calderón, G., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Mediation and online learning: Systematic literature mapping (2015–2020). Sustainability, 14(5), 2951.
Saeneewong Na Ayuttaya, P., Lawthong, N., Robson, M. G., & Siriwong, W. (2025). Development of a pesticide labeling literacy scale for Thai rice farmers: Item generation and content validity testing. Journal of Agromedicine, 30(1), 1–13.
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2019). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907.
Saw, Z. K., Yuen, J. J. X., Ashari, A., Ibrahim Bahemia, F., Low, Y. X., Nik Mustapha, N. M., & Lau, M. N. (2025). Forward–backward translation, content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity, test–retest reliability, and internal consistency of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainer. PLoS One, 20(1), e0314853.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Stahl, B. C., & King, M. (2020). The importance of transparency for trustworthiness in qualitative research. Ethics and Information Technology, 22(3), 189–201.
Torun, F. (2020). Teachers’ opinions on the distance education process during COVID-19 pandemic: The sample of primary school teachers. Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences, 6(2), 45–61.
UCC (Uganda Communications Commission). (2024). Annual report on the Uganda Communications Universal Service and Access Fund (UCUSAF). Kampala: UCC Publications.
VanDeWiele, M. D., Hastings, A. M., Evans, M. D., O’Connell, M. S., & Flynn, P. M. (2025). Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to predict the behavioral intent of teledentistry utilization among United States adults. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 31(2), 286–296.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Wang, Q. (2025). Technology and Technology-Mediated Learning. In Designing Technology-Mediated Learning Environments: Perspectives, Processes, and Applications (pp. 1–7). Springer Nature Singapore.
Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in higher education: A systematic review. Sage Open, 14(1), 21582440241229570.
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Yang, M., Al Mamun, A., Gao, J., Rahman, M. K., Salameh, A. A., & Alam, S. S. (2024). Predicting m-health acceptance from the perspective of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 339.
Yeung, N. C., Lau, S. T., Mak, W. W., Cheng, C., Chan, E. Y., Siu, J. Y., & Cheung, P. S. (2024). Applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to identify factors associated with intention to use tele delivered supportive care among recently diagnosed breast cancer survivors during COVID-19 in Hong Kong. JMIR Cancer, 10(1), e51072.
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54.
Copyright (c) 2026 Nantagya Grace Ssebanakitta, Joel Yawe Masagazi, Mary Kagoire Ocheng, Kyakulumbye Stephen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
