Scientific Collaboration and Research Productivity: Evidence from One College in Makerere University
Abstract
In academia, the many benefits of publishing make continuous publication a cardinal duty of faculty members. Some members work as lone writers and others work collaboratively to come up with scholarly works. Benefits of collaboration come in form of filling gaps between the haves and the have not by academic staff. In this study, the aim was to establish whether research collaboration among academic staff was related to research productivity. More specifically, we examined whether collaboration in publication of edited books, chapters in edited books, journal articles, and conference papers by members of academic staff was related to their research productivity. Using collaboration and publication data on 41 academic staff members in the College of Education and External Studies, Makerere University, we analysed the relationship between the two. Results of the Karl Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient indicated that the academic staff who collaborated were more research productive. This was true for all the four forms, individually namely; edited books, chapters in edited books, journal articles, and conference papers and in terms of aggregated four forms. This study underscores the importance of cultivating collaborative environments in academia to bolster scholarly output, which is not only to the benefit of academic staff but also to university administrators and policymakers when endorsing collaborative research initiatives and interdisciplinary cooperation. Thus, it contributes to the theoretical understanding of the subject by furnishing empirical evidence on the relationship between scientific collaboration and RP by members of academic staff
Downloads
References
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity. Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 1016- 1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.09.007
Albert, C., Davia, M. A., & Legazpe, N. (2016). Determinants of research productivity in Spanish academia. European Journal of Education, 51(4), 535-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12142
Allen, J. L., Huggins-Hoyt, K. Y., Holosko, M. J., & Briggs, H. E. (2018). African American social work faculty: Overcoming existing barriers and achieving research Productivity. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(3), 309- 319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049731517701578
Altbach, P. G. (2011). The past, present, and future of the research university. Economic and Political Weekly, 65- 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/9780821388051_CH01
Araujo, E. B., Moreira, A. A., Furtado, V., Pequeno, T. H. C., & Andrade, J. S. (2014). Collaboration networks from a large CV database: Dynamics, topology and bonus impact. PLoS ONE 9(3), e90537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090537
Ductor, L. (2015). Does co-authorship lead to higher academic productivity? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(3), 385- 407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/obes.12070
Friedman, Y., & Sills, M. (2015). Collaboration: A simple recipe for improving research productivity in the community teaching hospital setting. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 15(4), 373-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2015.1079688
Gopaul, B., Jones, G. A., Wenrib, J., Metcalfe, A., Fisher, D., Gingras, Y., & Rubenson, K. (2016). The academic profession in Canada: Perceptions of Canadian university faculty about research and teaching. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 46(2), 55-77. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1113456
Gorjizadeh, D., & Eftekhar, A. (2016). A scientometric analysis of scholarly publications in fields of management, operations, economics and business from Iran. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 47(4), 347– 368. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.47.4.347
He, Z., Geng, X., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy, 38, 306- 317. https://doi- org.libproxy.tuni.fi/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.011
Hedjazi, Y., & Behravan, J. (2011). Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. Higher Education, 62, 635-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9410-6
Horta, H., & Santos, J. M. (2016). The impact of publishing during PhD studies on career research publication, visibility, and collaborations. Research in Higher Education, 57, 28-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9380-0
Huang, G., Fang, C. H., Lopez, S. A., Bhagat, N., Langer, P. D., & Eloy, J. A. (2015). Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic ophthalmology. Journal of Surgical Education, 72(3), 410–417. https://doi- org.libproxy.tuni.fi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.010
Iglic, H., Doreian, P., Kronegger. L, & Ferligoj, A. (2017). With whom do researchers collaborate and why? Scientometrics, 112, 153-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2386-y
Jameel, A. S., & Ahmad, A. R. (2020). Factors impacting research productivity of academic staff at the Iraqi higher education system. International Business Education Journal, 13(1), 108- 126. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3614806
Kasabwala, K., Morton, C. M., Svider, P. F., Nahass, T. A., Eloy, J. A., & Jackson-Rosario, I. (2014). Factors influencing scholarly impact: Does urology fellowship training affect research output? Journal of Surgical Education, 71(3), 345–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.01.010
Kaweesi, M. (2018). Scholarly conceptions of the nature of academic research in universities: A literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(2), 208- 229. http://dx.doi.org/10.53449/ije.v1i2.60
Kaweesi, M., Bisaso, R., & Ezati, B. A. (2018). The culture-research nexus: Stakeholders’ perceptions of the connection between disciplinary cultures and research choices in higher education. African Journal of Education and Practice, 3(3), 1-22. https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/AJEP/article/view/774
Kaweesi, M., Bisaso, R., & Ezati, B. A. (2019). The nature and motive for academic research in hiher education: A sub-Saharan African perspective. International Journal of African Higher Education, 6(1), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v6i1.10577
Keck, A., Sloane, S., Liechty, J. M., Fiese, B. H., & Donovan, S. M. (2017). Productivity, impact, and collaboration differences between transdisciplinary and traditionally trained doctoral students: A comparison of publication patterns. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0189391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0189391
Kumar S., & Ratnavelu, K. (2016). Perceptions of scholars in the field of economics on co- authorship associations: Evidence from an international survey. PLoS ONE, 11(6), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157633
Kyvik, S., & Reymert, I. (2017). Research collaboration in groups and networks: Differences across academic fields. Scientometrics, 113, 951-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2497-5
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Sciences, 35(5), 673- 702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Li, F., Miao, Y., & Yang, C. (2015). How do alumni faculty behave in research collaboration? An analysis of Chang Jiang scholars in China. Research Policy, 44, 438-450. https://doi- org.libproxy.tuni.fi/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.002
Parish, A. J., Boyack, K. W., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PLoS ONE 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal. pone.0189742
Ponomariov, B. L., & Boardman, P. C. (2010). Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centres and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39, 613- 624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.013
Vuong, Q., Ho, M., Vuong, T., Nguyen, V., Napier, N. K., & Pham, H. (2017). Nemo solus satis sapit: Trends of research collaborations in the Vietnamese social sciences, observing 2008-2017 Scopus data. Publications, 5(24), 2- 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications5040024
Vuong, Q., Napier N. K., Ho, T. M., Nguyen, V. H., Vuong, T., Pham, H. H., & Nguyen, H. K. T. (2019). Effects of work environment and collaboration on research productivity in Vietnamese social sciences: Evidence from 2008 to 2017 Scopus data. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2132- 2147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1479845
Webber, K. (2011). Measuring faculty productivity. In S. J. C. Shin et al. (Eds.), University rankings theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education. 105-121. Springer. http://ihe.uga.edu/uploads/publications
Ynalvez, M. A., & Shrum, W. M. (2010). Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country. Research Policy 40, 204-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.004
Copyright (c) 2024 Christopher Muteesasira, Fredrick Edward K. Bakkabulindi, David Onen
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.