Options to the Use of Suspension and Expulsion in Kenyan Institutions: A Literature Review
Abstract
This article compared the effectiveness of punitive strategies such as suspension and expulsion to mitigate behaviour disorders in Kenyan schools. Behaviour disorders witnessed in Kenyan schools include externalising and internalising behaviour disorders. Externalising behaviour disorders include bullying, aggression, disruption, acting out, fighting, violence, destruction of property, cheating, and stealing among others. Internalising behaviour disorders include depression, anxiety, social withdrawal, immaturity, negative talk, substance abuse, loneliness or guilt, sadness, suicidal feelings, nervousness, and irritability among others. Suspension and expulsion are the zero tolerance (ZT) strategies used in our institutions to curb behaviour disorders. Zero tolerance measures are guidelines for providing the harshest retribution possible to every student who goes against the laid down regulations. Corporal punishment is also used as a punitive measure in our institutions despite its prohibition in the Children’s Act 2001. Corporal punishment was recognised to offer minor data on appropriate action to take but only educate the person on the inappropriate behaviours to avoid. This article found that solitary disciplinary practices like suspension and expulsion may further prohibit poor academic performance and dropout. The article further found out the importance of training the heads of learning institutions on how to manage inappropriate behaviour disorders and the incorporation of other strategies such as guidance and counselling and the involvement of parents. Thus, it encourages Kenyan institutions to adopt School-Wide Positive Behavioural Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS), which is a non-condoning approach used in controlling school violence and misbehaviour of students that have shown positive results in an unsystematically controlled trial research to control school violence and misbehaviour of students. This article also found out the need for a Functional Behavioural Assessment (FBA) before intervening for a behaviour disorder. The aim of an FBA is to collect wide and particular data so as to comprehend the exact purpose of the student’s inappropriate behaviours.
Downloads
References
Allen, D., James, W., Evans, J., Hawkins, S., &Jenkins, R. (2005). Positive Behavioural Support, definitions, status, and future directions. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 10(2), 4-11.
American Psychological Association (APA). (2008). Zero Tolerance Task Force. Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63(9), 852-62.
Black D. W. (2015). The constitutional limit of zero tolerance in schools. Minnesota Law Review; 99(3),823-904.
Boccanfuso, C. & Kuhfeld, M. (2011). Multiple responses, promising results: Evidence-based, non-punitive alternatives to zero tolerance. Washington DC: Child Trends.
Bodo, S. (2020). The education pendulum: the role of discipline in learner performance and quality of lifehttps://www.adeanet.org/en/blogs/education- pendulum- role- discipline- learner- performance-quality-life.
Borgwald, K. & Theixos, H. (2012). Bullying the bully: Why zero-tolerance policies get a failing grade. Social Influence, 8(2-3), 149-160.
Bos, C. S. & Vaughn, S. (2006). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behaviour problems. 6th Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bradley, R., Doolittle, J., Lopez, F., Smith, J., &Sugai, G. (2007). Discipline: Improved understanding and implementation. Paper presented at the OSEP Part B Regulations Regional Implementation Meeting: Building the Legacy IDEA 2004, Washington, DC.
Brown, J., Trone, J., Fratello, J., & Daftary-Kapur, T. (2013). Generation later: What we’ve learned about zero tolerance in schools. New York: Vera Institute of Justice. Accessed on February 2021.
Carr, E. G., Dunlap, G., Horner, R. H., Koegel, R. H., Turnbull, A. P., Sailor, W., &Fox, L. (2002). Positive behaviour support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behaviour Interventions, 4, 4-16.
Child Trends. (2007). Cognitive-Behavioural Training Program for Behaviourally Disordered Adolescents. https://www.childtrends.org/Lifecourse/programs/CogBehTraining.html
Ekombe, N. R. (2010). Methods used to enhance students discipline in public secondary schools in Kamukunji division Nairobi province, Kenya. Unpublished master thesis). Kenyatta University. M.E.D, Kenyatta University, Nairobi
Evans, I. M. & Meyer, I. H. (1985). An Educational Approach to Behaviour Problems: A Practical decision model for interventions with severely handicapped learners. Baltimore: Brooks.
Flick, L.G. (2011). Understanding and Managing Emotional and Behaviour Disorders in the Classroom. Pearson Publishers: Boston.
Gakure, R. W., Mukuria, P., & Kithae, P. P. (2013). An evaluation of factors that affect performance of primary schools in Kenya: A case study of Gatanga District. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(13), 927- 937.
Government of Kenya (2001). The Children Act, Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 95 (Acts No.8) (Revised Edition). Nairobi: Government Printers.
Gresham, F.M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioural interventions. School Psychology Review, 33, 326-34.
Heilbrun, A., Cornell, D., & Lovegrove, P. (2015). Principal attitudes regarding zero tolerance and racial disparities in school suspensions. Psychology in the Schools, 52(5), 489-499.
Hoffman S., (2014), Zero benefit: Estimating the effect of zero-tolerance discipline policies on racial disparities in school discipline. Educational Policy, 28(1), 69-95.
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., &Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behaviour support. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(8), 1–14.
Individuals with Disability Education Act Amendments of 2004 [IDEA]. (2004). Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/advocacy/education/idea.
Janney, R., & Snell, M. E. (2000). Behavioural support. Baltimore: Brookes
Kagema, N., &Kagoiya, P. (2018). Examining Factors Contributing to Indiscipline in Primary Schools in Nyeri Central Sub-County, Kenya. Pedagogical Research, 3(2).https://doi.org/10.20897/pr/91650
Kagendo, D. A. (2009). Effectiveness of the Strategies used in Managing Indiscipline in Secondary Schools; A Case of Maara District. M. Ed, Kenyatta University, Nairobi
Lee, D. L., &Axelrod, S. (2005). Behaviour modification: Basic principles (3rd Ed.) Austin, TX: PRO-ED
Martinez, S. A. (2009). System gone berserk: How are zero-tolerance policies really affecting schools? Preventing School Failure, 53(3), 153-158.
Mweru (2010) Why are Kenyan teachers still using corporal punishment eight years after a ban on corporal punishment? Child abuse Review, 19 (4) 248-258
National Association of School Psychologists (NASP). (2002). Positive behaviour Supports: Zero tolerance; IDEA and Discipline. https:// www.nasponline .org.
Njoroge, P. M., &Nyabuto, A. N. (2014). Discipline as a factor in academic performance in Kenya. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 4 (1), 289- 307. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n1p289
Onyango, P. A., Aloka, P. J., & Raburu, P. (2016). Effectiveness of exclusion in the management of student behavior problems in public secondary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Advanced and Multidisciplinary Social Science, 2(2), 33-39.
OSEP Centre on Positive Behavioural Interventions and Supports (2004). Implementers’ blueprint and self-assessment. Eugene: Centre on positive Behavioural Interventions and supports. The University of Oregon. www.pbis.org
Osher, D., Woodruff, D., & Sims, A. (2001). Exploring relationships between inappropriate and ineffective special education services for African American children and youth and the overrepresentation in the juvenile justice system. Unpublished manuscript. The Civil Rights Project
Perry, B. L. & Morris, E.W. (2014). Suspending Progress: Collateral consequences of exclusionary Punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review, 79 (6).1067-1087.
Pierangelo, R., & Giuliani, G. (2002). Assessment in Special Education: A practical Approach Boston. Allyn& Bacon
Prasetyarini, A., Hikmat, M., & Thoyibi, M. (2021). Strategies to Cope with Students’ Discipline Problems in Senior High School. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.9474
Redempta, E. (2010). A Research Project Submitted to The School of Education in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for The Degree of Masters in Education (Masters). Kenyatta University.
Republic of Kenya, (2001). Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 95 of 2001: The Children’s Act 2001. Nairobi: Government Printer. Republic of Kenya, (2003). Persons with Disability Act, 2003. Nairobi: Government printer
Rutherford, R. B., Quinn, M. M., Leone, P. E., Garfinkle, L., & Nelson, C. M. (2002). Education, disability, and juvenile justice: Recommended practices. In L. M. Bullock & R. A. Gable (Series Eds.). Addressing the diverse needs of children and youth with emotional/ behavioural disorders (4th Ed.) pp. 1-41. Arlington: CCBD.
Shippen, M.E., Simpson, R. G., & Crites, S. A. (2003). A Practical Guide to Functional Behavioural Assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(5), 36-44.
Simba, N., Agak, J., & Kabuka, E. (2016). Impact of Discipline on Academic Performance of Pupils in Public Primary Schools in Muhoroni Sub-County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6).
Skiba R.J. (2014). The failure of zero tolerance. Reclaiming Children & Youth, 22(4), 27. Accessed on March 16, 2020.
Skiba, R. (2000). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice (Policy Research Report #SRS2). Bloomington, IN: Indiana Education Policy Center: www. Indiana.edu/safeschl/ztze.pdf
Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (2000). School Discipline at a Crossroads: From Zero Tolerance to Early Response. Exceptional Children, 66, 335-347.
Sprague, J., & Walker, H. (2000). Early identification and intervention for youth with antisocial and violent behaviour. Exceptional Children, 66 (3), 367–379
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behaviour supports. Child & Family Behaviour Therapy, 24(1-2), 23–50
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H, Dunlap, G., Heinemann, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., & Wickham, D. (2000). Applying positive behaviour support and functional behavioural assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behaviour Interventions, 2, 131-143
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G. Hieneman, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., Scott, T., Liaupsin, C., Sailor, W., Turnbull, A. P., Turnbull, H. R., III, Wickham, D., Wilcox, B., & Ruef, M. (2000). Applying positive behavioral support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131-143.
US ED-School climate (2014). US Department of Education (US ED). Guiding Principles: A Resource Guide for Improving School Climate and Discipline; 2014. Accessed on January 16, 2020.
Vaughn, S., Bos, C. S., & Schumm, J. S. (2007). Teaching Students Who Are Exceptional, Diverse, and at risk in the General Education Classroom (4th Ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Wasonga, J. (1999). When children turn out to be pitiless killers. Retrieved from the web on 22nd August 2022 https://www.standard media.co.ke
Whisman, A., & Hammer, P. C. (2014). The association between school discipline and mathematics performance: A case for positive discipline approaches. Charleston, WV: West Virginia Department of Education, Division of Teaching and Learning, Office of Research.
Copyright (c) 2022 Annerose W. Wang’ang’a, PhD, Michael M. Ndurumo, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
