Investigating the Effects of Differentiated Instruction on High School Students’ Grammar Learning Achievement in an Ethiopian EFL Context, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

  • Yirgalem Girma Melka Addis Ababa University
  • Italo Beriso Jatta, PhD Addis Ababa University
Keywords: Differentiated Instruction, Differentiating Instructions, Instructional Strategies, Effects, One-Size-Fits-All Conventional Approach, English Grammar
Share Article:

Abstract

Differentiated instruction promotes learning for diverse groups of students with different learning needs, readiness levels, learning profiles as well as different areas of strengths and weaknesses. However, despite its potential benefits in facilitating learning for all, it is neither sufficiently explored nor commonly used in the Ethiopian regular classrooms where the one-size-fits-all approach seems to be the norm in the Ethiopian EFL class. Thus, this study investigated the effects of DI as translated into classroom practices through flexible grouping, tiered activities/tasks, anchored activities, and scaffolding techniques, on grade 12 students’ grammar learning achievement scores. The non-equivalent pre-test and post-test quasi-experimental study design was adopted. The grammar achievement test was used to get quantitative data from two intact groups (23 experimental and 24 comparisons). The pre-test data served as baseline data to check the comparability of the two groups regarding the grammar learning achievement scores while alleviating possible confounding variables that may likely affect the possible results of the study. To analyse the quantitative pre-test and post-test data, the SPSS software Version-24 was used. In the data analysis process, the independent sample t-test and paired-sample t-test were used, after checking normality. The results showed that the experimental group considerably outperformed the comparison group taught through the one-size-fits-all approach. The findings revealed that differentiating instruction considerably improved the post-test scores of the experimental group. The study concluded that using a differentiated instructional approach improves grade 12 students’ grammar learning achievement in an EFL class. Finally, it was suggested that differentiated instruction should be integrated into the regular EFL class in teaching high school students

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alavinia, P., & Farhady, S. (2012). Using differentiated instruction to teach vocabulary in mixed ability classes with a focus on multiple intelligences and learning styles. International Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 2(4), 72–82.

AlHashmi, B., & Elyas, T. (2018). Investigating the Effect of Differentiated Instruction in Light of the Ehrman & Leaver Construct on Grammar Learning. Arab World English Journal, 9 (3), 145-162

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.

Batstone, R. (1994). Grammar. Oxford University Press.

Borja, L. A., Soto, S. T., & Sanchez, T. X. (2015). Differentiating Instruction for EFL Learners. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(8), 30-36

Chin-Wen Chien (2015). Analysis of Taiwanese elementary school English teachers’ perceptions of, designs of, and knowledge constructed about differentiated instruction in content, Cogent Education, 5(2) pp. 270-281.

Cohen A. (1991). Second Language Testing. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.). Teaching English as a Second or foreign language. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill Jr, P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20, 159-165.

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.

Driskill, K. M. (2010). A qualitative study of teacher understanding and use of differentiated instruction to promote reading achievement (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix).

Firwana, S. S. (2017). The effect of differentiated instruction on learning English vocabulary and grammar among second-graders in UNRWA schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation) The Islamic University, Gaza.

Gedamu, A. D. (2013). The effects of differentiated instructional approach on grade eight students’ attitude and vocabulary learning achievements. Addis Ababa University, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.

Ginja, T. G., & Chen, X. (2020). Teacher Educators’ Perspectives and Experiences towards Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 781-798.

Hassina Belghoul (2014). Investigating the Effect of Activities Tiered by Cognitive Complexity

on EFL Students’ Written Production: The Case of Third Year Students of English at L’ arbi Ben M’Hidi University: Masters’ Thesis.

Heacox, D. (2012). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners (Updated anniversary edition). Free Spirit Publishing.

Koez, P., A., (2007). Differentiated Instruction: The effects on students Achievement in Elementary school. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation: Michigan: East Michigan University.

Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 34-62.

McBride, B. (2004). Data-driven instructional methods: "One strategy-fits-all" doesn't work in real classrooms. The Journal, 31(11), 38-40.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed). New York, NY: Pearson.

McNamara, T. (2000). Language Testing. Oxford University Press.

Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. A. (2008). Reach: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 31–47.

Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: a research basis. International Education Journal,

(7), 935-947.

Melese, S. (2019). Instructors’ knowledge, attitude and practice of differentiated instruction: The case of College of education and behavioral sciences, Bahir Dar University, Amhara region, Ethiopia. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1642294.

Melese, T. (2016). Differentiated instruction: Perceptions, practices and challenges of primary school teachers. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 4(3), 253-264.

Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria. VA: ASCD.

Tomlinson, C.A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia, USA

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom. Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd Ed.). Alexandria: ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., ... & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3), 119-145.

Ur, P. (1988). Grammar practice activities: A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge University Press.

Valiande, S. (2010). Differentiated Teaching in Mixed-Ability Classrooms / Learning Processes and Effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, CY.

Published
22 April, 2022
How to Cite
Melka, Y., & Jatta, I. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Differentiated Instruction on High School Students’ Grammar Learning Achievement in an Ethiopian EFL Context, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. East African Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.5.1.636