The Philosophy of Dissimilation, Meaninglessness and Isolation in Theatre of the Absurd: Evidence from John Ruganda’s Two Plays

  • Kipkoech Mark Chepkwony Kisii University
Keywords: Philosophy, Dissimilation, Meaninglessness, Isolation, Theatre Absurd, John Ruganda, Plays
Share Article:

Abstract

Drama and theatrical performance remain one of the most effective ways through which life’s reality can be experienced, described, perceived and portrayed. Absurd drama has come to be seen as one of the most modern literary movements that have been adopted by African playwrights, Ruganda included. Based on a study of plays by Ugandan playwright John Ruganda, this paper discusses the philosophy of dissimilation, meaninglessness and isolation in theatre of the absurd. The study used Ruganda’s two plays, namely The Floods and Shreds of Tenderness. The various modes through which absurd drama appeal to the aesthetic sensibilities were examined. The study employed descriptive research and used purposive sampling. Data was analysed qualitatively by describing the findings of the study to arrive at inferences and conclusions. In Ruganda’s plays, the country is represented as being sick and in dire need of an urgent remedy but no one has the desire to bring in a solution to it. The sickness has not only affected the people as individuals but the nation as a whole. The playwright is by extension pointing to the cause of the sickness affecting the nation as being attributed to bad leadership. Using the lives of main characters, the playwright also demonstrates the senselessness of the human life and the inadequacy of the rational approach by the open abandonment of rational devices and discursive thought. The characters are portrayed as isolated and lonely individuals whose lives and fate area mere subject of time. The finding of the study is an important contribution to understanding drama and the changing trend in literary criticism in drama

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Camus, A. (1955). The Myth of Sisyphus. Vintage Books.

CAROLYN, S. C. (2008). Violence And Memory In John Ruganda’s The Burdens And The Floods (Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Arts, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg).

Deming, W. E. (1990). Sample Design in business research. John Wiley and Sons.

Diao, K. (2008). Classical Readings of English Literature. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Esslin, M. (1991). The Theatre of the Absurd (3rd ed.). Penguin Books.

Gikandi, S. (1992). Ngugi’s Conversion: Writing and the Politics of Language. Research in African Literatures, 23(1), 131-144.

Imbuga, F. (1999). ‘An Introduction to John Ruganda’ in Uganda: The Cultural Landscape (ed.) Breitinger E. Kampala: Fountain Publishers Ltd.

Jorgensen, J. L. (1981). Uganda: A Modern History. London: Croom Helm Limited.

Mamdani, M. (1984). Imperialism and Fascism in Uganda. Trenton: Africa World Press.

Nabudere, W. (1980). Imperialism and Revolution in Uganda. Tanzania Publishing House.

Nazareth, P. (1980). The Third World Writer: His social Responsibility. Nairobi: Kenya Literature Bureau.

Odile, C. (2005). Writing the Child, Youth and Violence into the Francophone Novel from Sub Saharan Africa: The Impact of Age and Gender. Researches in African Literature, 36(2), 59-71.

Ogude, J. (1996). Ngugi’s Concept of History and Character Portrayal in his Post-Colonial Novels (PhD Thesis). University of the Witwatersrand.

Priebe, R. (2005). Literature, Community and Violence: Reading African Literature in the West, Post 9/11. Researches in African Literature, 36(2), 46-58.

Ruganda, J. (1980). The Floods. Nairobi: East African Publishers.

Ruganda, J. (2001). Shreds of Tenderness. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.

Terr, L. (1994). Unchained Memories: True Stories of Traumatic Memories, Lost and Found. New York: Basic Books.

Published
25 February, 2022
How to Cite
Chepkwony, K. (2022). The Philosophy of Dissimilation, Meaninglessness and Isolation in Theatre of the Absurd: Evidence from John Ruganda’s Two Plays. East African Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.5.1.563