Burundian Teachers’ Conceptualisations of Philosophy-Based Language Teaching Approach in Developing EFL Students’ Speaking Skill
Abstract
This study investigated the EFL teachers’ conceptualisations of the use of PBLT in EFL instruction. Thirteen EFL teachers selected from two higher education institutions in Burundi participated in the inquiry. The inquiry set out to assess participants’ beliefs and attitudes towards three constructs, namely the use of philosophical questions in the EFL classroom, the use of the EFL classroom as a community of inquiry, and the impact of PBLT in developing the EFL students’ speaking skill. A background information questionnaire, a Likert scale questionnaire, and an online structured interview were used to collect data from participants. The findings revealed participants’ positive views and attitudes towards the role of PBLT in EFL instruction. The use of philosophical questions in the EFL classroom as well as the use of the EFL classroom as a community of inquiry in enhancing EFL students’ productive and receptive skills was found to be highly favoured among participants. Furthermore, it was found that participants believe in the high potential of PBLT in developing the five components of speaking, namely fluency, accuracy, range, coherence, and content. Participants, however, showed a relatively diminished trust in PBLT when it comes to its role in enhancing the accuracy component, and this diminished trust may be attributed to the fact that accuracy relates much more to the linguistic form while PBLT puts greater focus on meaning.
Downloads
References
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and teacher education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
Dabbagh, A., & Noshadi, M. (2016). Philosophy-based language teaching approach on the horizon: A revolutionary pathway to put applied ELT into practice. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 1022-1028.
Gholamhossein, S., & Siamak, S. (2010). The development of L2 speaking skill and the related components: Insight from philosophical questions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 716-721.
Graves, K., & Garton, S. (2017). An analysis of three curriculum approaches to teaching English in public-sector schools. Language Teaching, 50(4), 441-482.
Gümüşok, F., & Daloğlu, A. (2018). Conceptualisation of theory in English language teaching by student teachers and practicing teachers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 1-17.
Hemmati, F., & Hoomanfard, M. H. (2014). Effect of philosophy-based language teaching on EFL learners’ speaking ability and their willingness to communicate. Journal of Social Issues and Humanities, 2, 240-246.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge.
Pishghadam, R. (2011). Introducing applied ELT as a new approach in second/foreign language studies. Iranian EFL Journal 7 (2), 8-14.
Salmons, J. (2011). Designing and conducting research with online interviews. Cases in online interview research, 1-30. Sage Publications.
Shahini, G., & Riazi, A. M. (2011). A PBLT Approach to Teaching ESL Speaking, Writing, and Thinking Skills. ELT Journal, 65 (2), 170-179.
Copyright (c) 2022 Juvénal Ntakarutimana, Ali Mohammad Fazilatfar, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.