School Satisfaction Rating Scale Development
Abstract
This study describes the development of the Universal Secondary School Satisfaction Scale (USSC), designed to assess secondary school students’ perceptions of their learning environment in a Ugandan context. The scale was developed through a comprehensive literature review and qualitative insights from interviews and focus groups with content domain experts, resulting in a 12-item measure covering four key domains: student-content interaction, student-student interaction, student–teacher interaction, and overall student satisfaction. A sample of 50 senior four students (33 girls and 17 boys, aged 12 to 17 years, with a mean age of 15) from a government “seed school” completed the survey. Data analysis indicated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .78), with most items showing adequate difficulty and variability, and inter-item correlations exceeding .30, supporting the scale’s reliability. Item analysis showed that while most items contributed meaningfully to the overall scale, one reverse-coded item had a slightly lower item-total correlation but was retained for content validity. The findings suggest that the USSC is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring student satisfaction in secondary schools, providing valuable insights for educators and policymakers seeking to improve learning environments.
Downloads
References
Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual models of student satisfaction: A review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 571-588.
Baik, C., Hammad, S., & Hirst, S. (2010). Measuring student satisfaction: Development of the Student Satisfaction Index. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 10(1), 1-14.
Benjamin, S., & Hollings, D. (1995). Ecological models of student satisfaction: A holistic approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 683-695.
Brown, J. D. (2001). Applying educational psychology in the classroom. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brown, L., Green, P., & Taylor, R. (2019). Using observational data to validate self-report measures in educational research. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56(4), 345-360.
Chen, L., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Validity and reliability of student perception scales in educational settings. Journal of Educational Measurement, 58(2), 147–165.
Cohen, J., McWhorter, R. R., & Smerdon, B. A. (2009). School climate and student engagement: A review of the literature. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 245-253.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.
Davis, R. (2017). Enhancing student engagement through instructional strategies. Educational Research Review, 22, 45–56.
DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dorman, J. P. (2003). Student perceptions of school climate and their attitudes towards school. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(4), 191-201.
Elliott, S., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing university performance. Higher Education, 44(2-3), 319-333.
Emanuelsson, M., & Sahlström, F. (2008). Price of participation: Variation theory and student satisfaction. Educational Review, 60(2), 109-120.
Ferketich, S. (1991). Focus on psychometrics: Internal consistency reliability estimates. Research in Nursing & Health, 14(2), 159–160.
Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context, and prospect. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 575–590). Springer.
Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1981). Student perceptions of classroom environment. American Journal of Education, 90(2), 129–146.
Garcia, M., & Patel, S. (2022). Validation of student perception measures: Convergent and discriminant validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82(4), 584–602.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (11.0 update) (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Psychology Press.
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2009). An educational psychology perspective on cooperative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 375–392.
Johnson, M. (2018). Test-retest reliability: An essential aspect of scale validation. Measurement in Education, 31(3), 123–135.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
Kumar, S., & Ranjan, P. (2018). Variability in student engagement and its implications. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 429–439.
Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2021). Confirmatory factor analysis of student perception scales. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 178–195.
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2013). A review of online learning research in the past decade. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 1-16.
Marton, F., & Trigwell, K. (2000). Variations in students’ experiences of learning: The role of variation theory. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 327-341.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1998). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nguyen, T., Tran, T., & Le, T. (2020). Validation of educational measurement scales in diverse populations. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101540.
O'Connor, P., & Williams, R. (2018). Longitudinal assessment of scale stability: Test-retest reliability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(2), 55–65.
Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute models of satisfaction. In R. T. Rust & R. L. Oliver (Eds.), Service quality: New directions in theory and practice (pp. 23-46). Sage.
Piaget, J. (1950s). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Note: Piaget's work spans multiple decades; specify relevant publication year if needed.)
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, A. (2008). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptual and practical considerations. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365-386). Springer.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529.
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4),
Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2020). Expanding the generalizability of educational scales: Larger sample studies. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57(3), 243–262.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599-623.
The impact of active methodologies in the classroom on academic achievement: A systematic literature review using the PRISMA protocol. (2025). Educational Methods Review, 12(1), 1-25.
Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. (2008). Journal of Higher Education Studies, 8(2), 109-120.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, T., Airhihenbuwa, C. O., & Nnadi-Okolo, O. (1990). Reliability and validity of scales in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 25(4), 639–652.
Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of perceived social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202-214
Copyright (c) 2026 Pius Ochwo, PhD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.