Individual Factors and Micro-Environment as Predictors of Research Skills of Female Doctoral Students at Makerere University
Abstract
Leech (2012) put forward a model with four predictors which explain who a knowledgeable and skilled researcher is. Based on Leech's model, the study aimed to test whether two of them (the individual and micro environment) were predictors of the research skills of female doctoral students in Makerere University (Mak). From the model, two hypotheses (H1-H2) were developed. That is, H1, which postulated that Individual Factors (IF), and H2, which postulated that the Micro-Environment (ME), both positively predicted research skills (RS) of female doctoral students in Mak. RS was operationalised as Creativity (Cr) and Readiness to do Research and to Write (RRW) for publication. Similarly, the two predictors (IR & ME) had four constructs each. Taking a positivist approach, cross-sectional and correlation designs, data were collected from 57 female doctoral students who filled out a self-administered questionnaire. Data analysis involved computation of descriptive statistics, correlation and multiple linear regression (MLR). Results revealed that two of the constructs of IF (Thinking Style [TS]; & Self-Efficacy [SE]) were significant positive predictors of RS, against the constructs of Motivation (M) and Personality (P), which were not. One construct of ME (Supervisor [Sup]) was a significant positive predictor of RS, while three others (Culture of the Department on Graduate Education [CDE]; Other Faculty [OF & Peers [Pe]) were not. Thus, of the eight sub-hypotheses, three were supported, meaning that Leech's model only offered a fair explanation of RS in Mak. Thus, a call for further research to explore all the predictors as put forward by Leech’s model in other contexts
Downloads
References
Barnes, B. J., Chard, L. A., Wolfe, E. W., & Stassen, M. L. A. (2011). An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the graduate advising survey for doctoral students. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 1-17. Retrieved from https://www.umass.edu/highered/sites/default/files/cv/williams-CV.pdf
Berk, A. R., Berg, J., Mortimer, R., Walton-Moses, B., & Yeo, T. P. (2008). Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Academic Medicine, 80(1), 66-71. Retrieved from https://www.bu.edu/.../Berk_Measuring-the-effectiveness-of-fac-mentoring-relationship.
Black, A. C., & McCoach, D. B. (2008). Validity study of the thinking styles inventory. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(2), 180-210. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ826290.pdf
Boeren, E., Lokhtina-Anthniou, I., Sakurai, Y., & Herman, C. (2015). Mentoring: A review of early career researcher studies. Frontline, Learning Research, 3(3), 64-76.Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1091054.pdf
Chesnut, S. R., Siwatu, K. O., Young, H. A., & Tong, Y. (2015). Examining the relationship between the re-search training environment, course experiences, and graduate students’ research self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 399-418. Retrieved from ijds.org/Volume10/IJDSv10p399-418Chesnut0914.pdf
Chumbley, S. B., Haynes, J. C., & Stofer, K. A. (2015). A measure of students’ motivation to learn science through agricultural STEM emphasis. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(4), 107-122. doi: 10.5032/jae.2015.04107
Feng, R. Xie, Y., & Wu, J. (2024). How is personality related to research performance? The mediating effect of research engagement. Front. Psychol. 14:1257166. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.125716.
Huanga, S., & Yang, C. (2024). Doctoral students’ research motivation and outcomes in China: Training environment moderation. Cogent Education 11(1), 2378261. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2378261
Gilmore, J., & Feldon, D. (2010, April 30-May 4). Measuring graduate students’ teaching and research skills through self-report: Descriptive findings and validity evidence. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509407.pdf
Johnston, L., Sampson, K. A., Comer, K., & Brogt, E. (2016). Using doctoral experience survey data to support developments in postgraduate supervision and support. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 185-203. Retrieved from ijds.org/Volume11/IJDSv11p185-203Johnston2272.pdf
Kerrigan, M. R., & Hayes, K. M. (2016). EdD students’ self-efficacy and interest in conducting research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 147-162. Retrieved from http://ijds.org/Volume11/IJDSv11p147- 162Kerrigan1975.pdf
Kimanje, E., & Lunyolo, O. (2022). Intricacies of supervisory research during Covid-19 era among doctoral students and supervisors in a premier University in Uganda. The Uganda Higher Education Review Journal, 10(1), 164-196. https://doi.org/10.58653/nche.v10i1.11
Kumar, V. K., & Holman, E. R. (1997). The creativity styles questionnaire-revised. Creativity Research Journal,10(1), 51-58. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1001_6
Leech, N. L. (2012). Educating knowledgeable and skilled researchers in doctoral programs in schools of education: A new model. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 19-37. doi: 10.28945/1558
Leech, N. L., Crepeau-Hobson, F., Perkins, M., & Haug, C. A. (2015). Research and evaluation methods programs in the United States. Quality Approaches in Higher Education, 6(2), 1-12. Retrieved from asq.org/edu/2015/.../research-and-evaluation-methods-programs-in-the-united-states
Leech, N. L., & Haug, C. A. (2015). Investigating graduate level research and statistics courses in schools of education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 93-110. Retrieved from ijds.org/Volume10/IJDSv10p093-110Leech0658.pdf
Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Being a good course-taker is not enough: A theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 137-154. doi:10.1080/03075070500043093
Lovitts, B. E. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn't, and why? The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 296-325. Retrieved from www.bhertz.nl/wp-content/.../07/The-transition-to-independent-research.lovitts.pdf
Lunyolo, O., Bakkabulindi, F., & Tusiime, H. M. (2019). Testing Leech's model on successful doctoral student completion in Makerere University. Journal of Sociology and Education in Africa, 16(2), 1-21.
Montuori, A. (2008). The joy of inquiry Journal of Transformation Education, 6(1), 8-26. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344608317041
Montuori, A., & Donnely, G. (2013). Creative inquiry and scholarship: Applications and implications in doctoral degree. World Futures: The Journal of Global Education, 69(1), 1-19. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2013.748575
Nakanjako, D., Katamba, A., Kaye, D. K., Okello, E., Kamya, M. R., Sewankambo, N., & Kiiza, H. M. (2014). Doctoral training in Uganda: Evaluation of mentoring best practices at Makerere University College of Health Sciences. BMC Medical Education, 14(9), 1-8. Retrieved from https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6920-14-9
Phillips, E. M., & Pugh, D. S. (2010). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors (5thed.). London, UK: Open University Press.
Schniederjans, M. J., & Kim, E. B. (2005). Relationship of student undergraduate achievement and personality characteristics in a total web-based environment: An empirical study. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(2), 205-221. Retrieved from 352 Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540- 4609.2005.00067.x
Sverdlick, A., Hall, N. C., Mc Alpine, L., & Huddard, K. (2018). The PhD experiences: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students' completions, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361-388. Retrieved from http//doi.org/10.28945/4113
Wamala, R., & Ssembatya, V. A. (2013). Scholarly productivity in developing countries: An analysis of levels and patterns among doctoral holders in Uganda. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 6(2), 163-172. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1073193.pdf
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65-S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Woolderink, M., Putnik, K., van der Boom, H., & Klabbers, G. (2015). The voice of PhD candidates and PhD supervisors. A qualitative exploratory study amongst PhD candidates and supervisors to evaluate the relational aspects of PhD supervision in the Netherlands. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 217- 235. Retrieved from ijds.org/Volume10/IJDSv10p217-235Woolderink0852.pdf
Yazdani, S., & Shokooh, F. (2018). Defining doctorateness: A concept analysis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 31- 48. Retrieved from http//doi.org/10.28945/3939
Copyright (c) 2025 Olive Lunyolo, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
