A Discourse Analysis Perspective of Thematic Structure and Thematic Progression in Students’ Written Narrative Texts: A Case of Mjimpya Secondary School Students in Morogoro Municipality
Abstract
The study investigated the thematic structure and thematic progression in students’ written narrative texts. Specifically, it analysed types of themes and identified types of thematic progression patterns employed in students’ written narrative texts. It also examined the implications of the theme and thematic progression pattern’s predominance in students’ written narrative texts. 85 participants were selected from among Form Three and Form Four students. Data was collected using the closed test and documentary reviews. Data was coded and analysed using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and Thematic Progression (TP) theories by Halliday, Mathiessen, and Danes respectively. The findings indicated that students employed the taxonomy of four types of themes in their narrative texts: topical theme, textual theme, interpersonal theme, and macro theme. The topical theme was predominantly used followed by textual theme and interpersonal theme. The findings also revealed the taxonomy of seven types of thematic progression patterns in students’ written narrative texts, namely: constant pattern, zigzag pattern, and multiple patterns, constant-zigzag or zigzag-constant, constant-zigzag-multiple, zigzag-multiple, and constant macro pattern. The constant pattern was predominantly used followed by a zigzag pattern and then multiple patterns. The predominance of topical themes and constant thematic progression patterns implied that students tended to rely on thematic selections like topical themes and constant which seem simpler to use rather than textual themes, interpersonal themes, zigzag patterns and multiple patterns, all of which seem complex for students since they need advanced and sophisticated knowledge and skills to apply these thematic structures and progression patterns in their texts. Thus, students’ dependence on simple thematic selections indicates a lack of knowledge or ability to use complex thematic structures and thematic progression patterns in their written narrative texts while these thematic structures have a crucial role in their writing. Therefore, a systematic approach to teaching thematic selections is crucial. The findings of the current study contribute to the body of knowledge on thematic structure and progression in academic writing due to the detailed taxonomy of thematic structure and progression patterns revealed in this study. The study recommends that educational planners and implementers ensure that the theory of thematic structure and thematic progression are systematically integrated into the teaching and learning of writing activities from lower levels of education, specifically secondary education. Further, the study recommends further research in this area to use different approaches, genres and respondents from different settings such as advanced-level secondary school students
Downloads
References
Almurashi, M. N. (2016). Thematic progression in the writing of Saudi EFL. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, URL: https:// dx.doi. Org/10. 5296 /jsel.v4i1.9423
Arunsirot, S. (2013). An analysis of textual metafunction in Thai EFL students’ writing. Novitas Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 7(2), 160-174.
Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Danes, F. (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective. Delhi: NewAge International (P) Limited. Academia, 106-128.
Devira, M., Makhroji, Bania, A.S., & Sari, N. (2020). Constant, Zig-Zag Linear or Multiple? Thematic Progression Patterns on EFL Students’ Recount Texts Indonesia.Universitas Samudra, Langsa, Aceh. Elite Journal Volume 7 Nomor2, December 2020
Dewi, M.W., Hernawan, K. F., & Apsari,Y. (2019). Thematic progression in students’ description texts. Professional Journal of English Education 2 (2) 126-132
Enyi, A.U., & Orji, E.C. (2019). Lexical cohesion in non-fictional narrative as discourse: A Study of Ngugi Wa Thiong’O’s decolonizing the mind. Ebonyi State University. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 7(3) 2019
Fitriati, S. W., & Gayatri, N.M. (2021). Thematic progression in EFL Learners’ writing: A Literature review. Lingua Cultural Journal, 15 (2), 257– 262. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i2.7645
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th Ed.) Abingdon: Routledge.
Jing, W (2015). Theme and Thematic Progression in English Writing Teaching. Journal of Education and Practice. 6: 178-187
Komba, S. A., & Katundu, M. A. (2021). Thematic progression in Tanzanian scientific research articles’: The case of linguistics and education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11 (5), 580-589.
Kuo, C. H. (2016). Thematic progression patterns in written English of Taiwanese College students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6 (1), 34-43.
Kuswoyo, H. (2016). Thematic structure in Barack Obama’s press conference: A Systemic functional grammar study. Academic Australian International Journal, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.2p.257
Liu, J., & Zang, Y. (2018). Thematic progression in the writing of Chinese EFL learners: A comparison of argumentative and narrative essays. English Language Teaching Journal, 11 (11), 86-97.
Mushi, F. M., & Nkya, R. M. (2018). Thematic progression in Tanzanian academic texts: A comparative study. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 6 (1), 14-25.
Mwakasaka, F. (2016). Thematic progression in political speeches in Tanzania: A case study of speeches delivered by Jakaya Kikwete. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 4 (1), 1-12.
Njobvu, N. (2022). Does thematic progression enhance English discourse coherence? The University of Zambia. Zambia. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 10 (3), 29-41
Pasaribu, A.N., Pasaribu, T. K., & Panggabean, S. (2019). Thematic progression of students’ narrative writing. Journal llmiah simantek, 3 (2), 155-163
Saeed, A. Karim, S., & Mughal, S. H. (2021). The impact of theme-rheme progression method on improving textual coherence and cohesion in L2 writing: A Study of L2 Learners of English. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9 (2), 82 – 92
Sharndama, E.C., & Panamah, J.H. (2013). Thematic structure and progression in selected business news report of two Nigerian newspapers: Implications for Professional Writing. Nigeria. Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), Volume -2, No.-7, August, 2013
Sukawatie, L.E. (2018). Thematic progression on third grade students’ writing in www. The write source. Com. Sebelas Maret University. Journal of English Language Education, Vol 1 (1) 2018: 87-96
Susilowati, E., Faridi, A., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2022). Thematic structure and thematic progression in research articles published in Scopus- Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia. English Education Journal, 12 (1) (2022) 55-66
Suwandi. (2016). Coherence and cohesion: An analysis of the final project abstracts of the undergraduate students of PGRI Semarang. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 253- 261. https://doi. org/10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1349.
Utomo, A. B., Albaekani, A.K., & Pahlevi, M.R. (2020). Thematic progression of students’ writing descriptive texts in junior high school. Indonesia Universit as Singaperbangsa. Journal of English Language Education, 1 (1) October 2020
Xiao, X. M. (2017). Thematic progression theory and its application in EAP writing. Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China. International Conference on Education and Development Journal (ICED 2017)
Xiangyun, Z., & Xiaolan, L. (2020). The study on thematic progression patterns in economic journalist texts from China Daily. International Journal of lgs, LT & Linguistics Vol.6 No1 march 2020
Yunita, S. (2018). Theme and thematic progression in students’ recount text. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 524-530. https://doi.org/10.17509/
Copyright (c) 2024 Julius Eustace, Godfrey Muganda, PhD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.