Exploring How Female Scientists are Uplifted in Research Networks in STEM Fields in Public Universities in Uganda

Safina Galenda

doi:10.37284/eajes.7.4.2329

Safina Galenda Makerere University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.7.4.2329

Keywords: Networks, Females Scientists, STEM and Uplifting

Share Article:

Abstract

Participation in research networks is inevitable for the female scientists in the Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields because they provide a platform for collaborative activities. New research communities of women are created to support each other through mentoring, advancing shared research interests, co-organizing conferences with men, participating in the editorial and the publications. It was on this basis that this study explored how female scientists were uplifted by research networks in STEM fields in public universities in Uganda. This study was anchored on the existential phenomenology by Martin Heidegger in the interpretive world view. Eight female scientists in research networks in STEM fields in public universities in Uganda were interviewed and they were selected from the hard applied and hard pure disciplines as classified in Becher and Biglan’s typology of academic disciplines. Using thematic analysis, two themes such as research collaboration activities and capacity development emerged in this study. This qualitative study set out to explore how female scientists were uplifted in research networks in public universities in Uganda.The public universities included Makerere University, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Gulu University and Busitema University. Both semi-structured interviews and document check data generation strategies were used in this study. In semi-structured interviews, a sample comprising eight female academics with not less than five years in research networks in public universities were selected, while documents such as the annual reports and strategic plans were used. This study concludes that research networks are uplifting the female scientists in STEM fields in public universities in Uganda because they were internationally exposed, networked, funded, research skills were strengthened, and progressed in career. This study concludes that it was important for female scientists to access physical and human resource in their research networks as this increased their research performance and outputs in STEM fields in public universities in Uganda. This study therefore recommends that, to uplift female scientists in research networks in STEM fields in public universities in Uganda, female scientists in the research networks and senior colleagues should act as ambassadors and mentors to young female scientists in STEM fields

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abramo, G., D’angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2019a). The collaboration behavior of top scientists. Scientometrics, 118, 215-232.

Aksnes, D. W., Piro, F. N., & Rørstad, K. (2019). Gender gaps in international research collaboration: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 120, 747-774.

Astegiano, J., Sebastián-González, E., & Castanho, C. D. T. (2019). Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review. Royal Society open science, 6(6), 181566.

Bansal, S., Mahendiratta, S., Kumar, S., Sarma, P., Prakash, A., & Medhi, B. (2019). Collaborative Bauer, K., Chambers, E. W., Johnson, B., Lauter, K. E., & Leonard, K. (2022). Research Networks for Women. European Mathematical Society Magazine, (126), 41-50.research in modern era: Need and challenges. Indian journal of pharmacology, 51(3), 137.

Bonilla, K., Cabrera, J., Calles-Minero, C., Torres-Atencio, I., Aquino, K., Renderos, D., & Alonzo, M. (2021). Participation in communities of women scientists in Central America: implications from the science diplomacy perspective. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 6, 661508.

Fox, M. F., Realff, M, L., Rueda, D, R., & Morn, J. (2017). International research collaboration among women engineers: Frequency and perceived barriers by regions.” Journal of Technology Transfer, 42 (6), 1292–306.

González-Piñero, M., Páez-Avilés, C., Juanola-Feliu, E., & Samitier, J. (2021). Cross-fertilization of knowledge and technologies in collaborative research projects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(11), 34-59.

Government of Uganda. (2013). Uganda vision 2040. Kampala, Uganda: National Planning Authority (NPA).

Government of Uganda. (2020). National Development Plan (NDPIII) 2020/21-2024/25. Kampala, Uganda: National Planning Authority (NPA)

Gulu University (2020). Gulu University Annual report 2020/2021

Holman, L., & Morandin, C. (2019). Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences. PloS ONE, 14(4), e0216128.

Iglic, H., Doreian, P., Kronegger, L., & Ferligoj, A. K. (2017). With whom do researchers collaborate and why? Scientometrics, 112, 153–174.

Jadidi, M., Karimi, F., Lietz, H., & Wagner, C. (2017). Gender disparities in science? Dropout, productivity, collaborations, and success of male and female computer scientists. Advances in Complex Systems, 20 (0), 1750011.

Kwiek, M. (2021). What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: Changing national patterns in global contexts, Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2629-2649.

Kwiek, M., & Roszka, W. (2021). Gender disparities in international research collaboration: A study of 25,000 university professors. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(5), 1344-1380.

Lerchenmueller, M. J., Sorenson, O., & Jena, A. B. (2019). Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study. bmj, 367.

Lin, N. (1999a). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.

Lin, N. (1999b). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467-87.

Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom

Makerere University. (2021). Makerere University College of Health Sciences Annual Report, Kampala, Uganda.

Petersen, A. M. (2018). Multiscale impact of researcher mobility. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 15(146), 20180580.

Quadrio Curzio, A., Blowers, T., & Thomson, J. (2020). Women, science, and development: The leading role of Organization for Women in Sciences for the Developing World. Economia Politica, 37, 1–12.

Rossouw, J. (2022). Sustainable development of a researcher's career trajectory. Perspectives in Education, 40(3), 78-94.

Sato, S., Gygax, P, M., Randall, J., & Mast, M. S. (2021). The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: Challenges and future directions. Higher Education, 82, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00626.

Shih, T., Chubb, A., & Cooney-O’Donoghue, D. (2024). Scientific collaboration amid geopolitical tensions: a comparison of Sweden and Australia. Higher Education, 87(5), 1339-1356.

Uhly, K. M., Visser, L. M., & Zippel, K, S. (2017). Gendered patterns in international research collaborations in academia, Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 760-782.

Zippel, K. (2017). Women in global science: Advancing careers through international collaboration: Stanford University Press.