Reframing the Perceived Changing Academic Roles of Deans: A Case of Makerere University

  • Bernadette Lutaaya Makerere University
Keywords: Reframing, Perceived, Changing Academic Roles and Deans
Share Article:

Abstract

Existing literature shows that deans in higher education institutions are key in nurturing, facilitating growth and setting high standards for faculty, staff, and students among other stakeholders. They are also expected to create a positive work environment within schools, colleges, or departments. However, less literature has concentrated on how these deans reframe their perceived changing academic roles at Makerere University. This study therefore set out to explore the reframing strategies of deans as regards their perceived changing academic roles in the context of Makerere University. Findings indicate that deans reframe their perceived changing academic roles at Makerere University using multi-frame. That is using all four or three of the frames to view a particular decision through four different lenses before selecting the best option. These four lenses are majorly the human resource, followed by structural and political. The symbolic frame was the least exploited among the frames, yet science-based disciplines were seen to be using the political frame majorly. The study concludes that multi-framing as recommended by Bolman and Deal was adhered to by all deans meaning that despite the complex environment in which they work, they have remained relevant due to the use of three or four frames. It was noted that the political frame was highly used in the science-based disciplines, especially the hard applied fields. The study recommends that the symbolic frame be exploited by the deans due to its benefits including deans being role models and using ceremonies where faculty meet, share, and relax to break the routine of academic work for this is energizing. Further still, the study recommends that deans embrace the political frame to boost their schools financially

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AKOĞLU, H. E., MUTLU, T. O., ŞENTÜRK, H. E., & ÇETİNKAYA, A. (2022). How Academics' Work Motivation Affect Job Satisfaction? The Mediating Roles of The Four-Frame Leadership Model. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 369-388.

Bensimon, E. M. (1989). The meaning of" good presidential leadership": A frame analysis. The Review of Higher Education, 12(2), 107-123.

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership: John Wiley & Sons.

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2018). Reframing the path to school leadership: A guide for teachers and principals: Corwin Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis: American Psychological Association.

Davis, A., Jansen van Rensburg, M., & Venter, P. (2016). The impact of managerialism on the strategy work of university middle managers. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1480-1494.

Delaney, N. A. (2021). Identifying Role Perceptions of Academic Deans at Four-Year, Regional, Public Institutions in the Northeast United States. University of Hartford,

Doyle, T., & Brady, M. (2018). Reframing the university as an emergent organisation: implications for strategic management and leadership in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(4), 305-320.

Fruehauf, J., Al-Khalifa, F., & Coniker, J. (2015). USING BOLMAN AND DEAL'S FOUR FRAMES IN DEVELOPING A DATA GOVERNANCE STRATEGY. Issues in Information Systems, 16(2).

Gallos, J. V. (2006). Reframing Complexity: A Four-Dimensional Approach to Organizational Diagnosis. Development, and Change. Organization development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hellsten, L.-a. M., Noonan, B., Preston, J. P., & Prytula, M. P. (2013). Principals' Perceptions of Assessment Leadership: A Study of the Assessment Practices of School Principals in Saskatchewan (Canada). International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)), 40(3).

Henning, J. (2022). An Educational Journey to Deanship: A Memoir. Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention, 29(1).

Holmes, W. T., & Scull, W. R. (2019). Reframing organizations through leadership communications: the four-frames of leadership viewed through motivating language. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal.

Katz, N. H., & Wahlgren, M. A. (2022). Utilization of Frames and Reframing for Organizational Leadership and Conflict Management Effectiveness. De Gruyter Handbook of Organizational Conflict Management, 103.

Lemon, E., Tureen, A., Martin, J., Hoffman, S., Thuna, M., & Miller, W. (2022). Using Virtual Cohorts for Wellness, Problem-Solving, and Leadership Development. In Leadership Wellness and Mental Health Concerns in Higher Education (pp. 272-290): IGI Global.

Li, J. (2021). Book review: Women in leadership, contextual dynamics, and boundaries. In: SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.

Monahan, M. L., & Shah, A. J. (2011). Having the right tools: The leadership frames of university presidents. The Coastal Business Journal, 10(1), 2.

Otara, A. (2014). The Academic dean and the challenges of meeting changing expectations in a competitive higher education environment in Africa. Journal of Higher Education in Africa/Revue de l'enseignement supérieur en Afrique, 12(1), 133-150.

Percy, A., Press, N., Andrew, M. B., & Pollard, V. (2021). Reframing theory of, and for, practice in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4), 1.

Photinopoulos, A. (2021). Bolman and Deal’s Four Frames and the Quality Standards Academic Committee: An Analysis of Select Past and Future Leadership Decisions.

Quainoo, E. A., Chunga, J. O., & Lukoko, H. O. (2020). Deans’ leadership and organizational commitment in higher education; A review of literature. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 8(3), 167-174.

Schoepp, K., & Tezcan-Unal, B. (2017). Examining the effectiveness of a learning outcomes assessment program: A four frames perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 42(4), 305-319.

Snyder, R. R. (2018). Show Me the Resources: Teachers' Perceptions of Educational Leader Responsibilities. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 13(1), 152-164.

Sowell, S. (2014). Building a new paradigm: Analysis of a case study in organizational change in collection management using Bolman's and Deal's four-frame model. Collection management, 39(2-3), 211-226.

Sriram, R., & Farley, J. H. (2014). Circular framing: A model for applying Bolman and Deal’s four frames in student affairs administration. Student Affairs, 23, 103.

Tobe, D. E. (1999). The development of cognitive leadership frames among African American female college presidents: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Uzarski, D., & Broome, M. E. (2019). A leadership framework for implementation of an organization's strategic plan. Journal of Professional Nursing, 35(1), 12-17.

Vuori, J. (2011). Leadership frames of program directors at Finnish universities of applied sciences: Tampere University Press.

Published
9 March, 2024
How to Cite
Lutaaya, B. (2024). Reframing the Perceived Changing Academic Roles of Deans: A Case of Makerere University. East African Journal of Education Studies, 7(1), 437-458. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.7.1.1808