The Effect of Frequency of Teacher Performance Appraisal Activities on Teacher Progression in Bomet County, Kenya

  • Beatrice Chepkemoi Koech Maasai Mara University
  • Ruth Jepkemboi Choge, PhD Koitalel Samoei University College
  • Alexander Ronoh, PhD Maasai Mara University
Keywords: Performance Appraisal, Teacher Progression, Professional Development, Feedback, Education, Secondary Schools
Share Article:

Abstract

Performance appraisal is critical for evaluating teachers' job performance and providing feedback. This study explores the frequency and effectiveness of teacher performance appraisals in relation to teacher progression in secondary schools in Bomet County, Kenya. The research involved 423 participants, including teachers, principals, and education authorities. Random sampling was employed to select teachers in the different sub-county. School principals, TSC County, and Sub-County directors were proposed, selected, and interviewed during the study. Questionnaires were used to collect data from teachers. The study revealed that regular performance appraisals allow teachers to enhance their teaching skills and monitor their progress. Most respondents (67.54%) reported being appraised more than three times, emphasizing the importance of frequent assessments for professional development. Teachers informed in advance of their appraisals (88.39%) reported better preparation, leading to improved student outcomes. Performance appraisals were seen as a means to enhance professional progress, with 84.31% of teachers reporting an improvement in their career development. Most teachers (67.83%) also received feedback after appraisals, contributing to their professional growth. The study highlights the significance of regular, well-informed, and feedback-rich performance appraisals in improving teacher progression. It underscores the need for educators and education authorities to maintain a structured appraisal process to support teachers in their professional development and enhance student achievement

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acheson, K., & Gall, M. (1992). Techniques in the Clinical Supervision of Teachers. New York: Longman.

Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2011). Why we hate performance management—And why we should love it. Business Horizons, 54(6), 503-507.

Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong's handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance. Kogan Page Publishers.

Baker, E. L., & Barton, P. E. (2010). Problems with the Use of Student Test Scores to Evaluate Teachers. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

County Government of Bomet. (2018). County Integrated Development Plan 2018-2022. https://repository.kippra.or.ke/handle/123456789/1103

Chen, J., & Eldridge, D. (2012). Is standardized performance appraisal practices' really preferred? A case study in China '. Chinese Management Studies, 4(3), 244–257.

Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 8–15.

Enz, A., Anand, R., & Gharabawi, G. (1996). Efficacy and safety results of the early phase studies with Exelon TM in Alzheimer's disease: An overview. Journal of Drug Development and Clinical Practice, 8, 109-116.

Falk, B., & Ort, S. (1998). Sitting Down to Score. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 59-64.

Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23.

Hallinger P., Heck, R. H., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: an analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5–28.

Ibrahim, U. A., Precious, R., Maitala, F., & Daniel, C. O. (2022). Structural Change and Employee Satisfaction of Privately-Owned Hotels in Nigeria. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 1600-1612.

Isore, M. (2009). Teacher Evaluation: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review. New York: Guilford Press.

Kleinhenz, E., & Ingvarson, L. (2002). Is too little teacher evaluation better than poor teacher evaluation? London: Edward Arnold

Kothari. (2007). learning professional confidence: Linking teaching practices, students' self-perceptions, and gender. The Review of Higher Education, 24, 173–191.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research Methods – Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis. Nairobi: ACTS Press

Muli, P. K. (2010). The impact of performance appraisal on secondary school teacher professional development in Kitui West District. Unpublished M.Ed Project, Kenyatta University.

Nyongesa J. M. (2007). Educational organization and management, Jomo Kenyatta Foundation, 2007

Ratri, M. C., Harymawan, I., & Nowland, J. (2020). Assessment of criteria for performance excellence (KPKU) and firm performance: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(3).

Williams, J. R. & Hays, J. C., (2011). Testing multiple motives in feedback seeking: The interaction of instrumentality and self-protection motives. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 496-504

Published
16 November, 2023
How to Cite
Koech, B., Choge, R., & Ronoh, A. (2023). The Effect of Frequency of Teacher Performance Appraisal Activities on Teacher Progression in Bomet County, Kenya. East African Journal of Education Studies, 6(3), 304-310. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.6.3.1577