Assessment of the Efficiency of Problematic Animal Interventions in Mitigating Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Uganda: A Case Study of Lake Mburo National Park

Immaculate Kembabazi; Robert Ssenfuma; Medard Twinamatsiko; Charles Muchunguzi; Rogers Tinkasimire; Upton Nuwagira

doi:10.37284/ijar.7.1.2190

Immaculate Kembabazi Makerere University
Robert Ssenfuma Makerere University
Medard Twinamatsiko Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Charles Muchunguzi Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Rogers Tinkasimire Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Upton Nuwagira Mbarara University of Science and Technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/ijar.7.1.2190

Keywords: Assessment, Animal Interventions, Human-Wildlife Conflicts

Share Article:

Abstract

Human-wildlife conflict is a significant challenge in Uganda, particularly in areas where human populations and wildlife habitats overlap. This study examines the efficiency of various interventions aimed at mitigating human wildlife conflicts in and around Lake Mburo National Park, a region renowned for its rich biodiversity and diverse ecosystems. Lake Mburo National Park is surrounded by agricultural and pastoralist communities that frequently experience crop raiding, livestock predation, and threats to human safety from wildlife. Various interventions, including physical barriers, deterrents, translocation of problematic animals, and community engagement initiatives, have been implemented to address these conflicts. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods, including field observations, community surveys, and analysis of intervention outcomes. A total of 125 households were interviewed across several parishes of Rurambira, Rwamuhuku, Rwabarata, Kizimbi, Kashojwa and Rwetango in Kiruhura and Isingiro districts. The findings indicate that the majority of respondents have lived in the area for over 20 years, providing them with extensive knowledge of local wildlife interactions. The results highlight that hippos (76%) are the most problematic animals, primarily causing crop damage, which significantly impacts local livelihoods. The study reveals that guarding property (98%), though stressful and time-consuming, is the most effective and commonly used intervention. Other measures, such as strong shelters, trapping, translocation, and various deterrents, show varying degrees of effectiveness depending on the species involved. The study concludes that understanding the species-specific and context-specific effectiveness of these interventions is crucial for developing sustainable strategies to mitigate HWC. The insights gained from this research can inform future conflict mitigation strategies and contribute to the broader discourse on human-wildlife coexistence in Uganda and similar settings worldwide

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya, K. P., Paudel, P. K., Neupane, P. R., & Köhl, M. (2016). Human-wildlife conflicts in Nepal: patterns of human fatalities and injuries caused by large mammals. PLoS One, 11(9), e0161717.

Ajayi, V. O. (2017). Primary sources of data and secondary sources of data. Benue State University, 1(1), 1–6.

Anand, S., & Radhakrishna, S. (2017). Investigating trends in human-wildlife conflict: is conflict escalation real or imagined? Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 10(2), 154–161.

Artelle, K. A., Anderson, S. C., Reynolds, J. D., Cooper, A. B., Paquet, P. C., & Darimont, C. T. (2016). Ecology of conflict: marine food supply affects human-wildlife interactions on land. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 25936.

Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge University Press.

Bonacic, C., Amaya-Espinel, J. D., & Ibarra, J. T. (2016). Human-wildlife conflicts. Trop Conserv Perspect Local Global Priorities, 11, 109.

Bond, M. L., Lee, D. E., & Kiffner, C. (2022). Towards human-wildlife coexistence in the tarangire ecosystem. In Tarangire: Human-wildlife coexistence in a fragmented ecosystem (pp. 367–391). Springer.

Findlay, L. (2016). Human-primate conflict: An interdisciplinary evaluation of wildlife crop raiding on commercial crop farms in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Durham University.

Haq, M. (2015). A Comparative Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods and a Justification for Adopting Mixed Methods in Social Research.

Kideghesho, J., Rija, A., Mwamende, K., & Selemani, I. (2013). Emerging issues and challenges in conservation of biodiversity in the rangelands of Tanzania. Nature Conservation, 6, 1–29.

Marowa, I., Matanzima, J., & Nhiwatiwa, T. (2021). Interactions between humans, crocodiles, and hippos at Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe. Human–Wildlife Interactions, 15(1), 25.

Matusal, M., Megaze, A., & Dobamo, T. (2023). Population Density of Wild Animals and Their Conflict in Konasa_Pulasa Community Conserved Forest, Omo Valley, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Ecology, 2023(1), 8437073.

Mkonyi, F. J., Estes, A. B., Msuha, M. J., Lichtenfeld, L. L., & Durant, S. M. (2017). Socio-economic correlates and management implications of livestock depredation by large carnivores in the Tarangire ecosystem, northern Tanzania. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 13(1), 248–263.

Mojo, D., Rothschuh, J., & Alebachew, M. (2014). Farmers’ perceptions of the impacts of human–wildlife conflict on their livelihood and natural resource management efforts in Cheha Woreda of Guraghe Zone, Ethiopia. Human-Wildlife Interactions, 8(1), 67–77.

Nicole, B.-F. (2019). An assessment of the human-wildlife conflict across Africa. Wildlife Population Monitoring, 1–10.

Nkansah-Dwamena, E. (2023). Lessons learned from community engagement and participation in fostering coexistence and minimizing human-wildlife conflict in Ghana. Trees, Forests and People, 14, 100430.

Perdana, A., Robb, A., & Rohde, F. (2015). An integrative review and synthesis of XBRL research in academic journals. Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 115–153.

Prosper, D. (2021). Peasants Perception on Wild Animal’s Crop-Raiding in Selected Villages Surrounding Udzungwa Mountain National Park, Tanzania. The Open University of Tanzania.

Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5(1), 8–15.

Raphela, T. D. (2019). Crop raiding by wildlife on subsistence homesteads around the Hluhluwe game reserve South Africa.

Strum, S. C. (2023). Confessions of a baboon watcher: from inside to outside the paradigm. Primates, 64(4), 393–406.

Torres, D. F., Oliveira, E. S., & Alves, R. R. N. (2018). Understanding human–wildlife conflicts and their implications. In Ethnozoology (pp. 421–445). Elsevier.

Utete, B. (2020). A review of some aspects of the ecology, population trends, threats and conservation strategies for the common hippopotamus, Hippopotamus amphibius L, in Zimbabwe. African Zoology, 55(3), 187–200.

Wallace, G. E., & Hill, C. M. (2016). Deterring Crop-Foraging Wildlife.

Waring, S. M. (2021). Integrating primary and secondary sources into teaching: The SOURCES framework for authentic investigation. Teachers College Press.