Assessing the Effectiveness of the Institutional Frameworks Established by the Government to Enhance Accountability in Local Governments in Uganda: Voices from the Greater Kigezi District Local Governments
Abstract
This study investigates the levels of stakeholder participation in management decision-making for the effective management of Kabale and Mbarara Central Markets in Uganda. Management decision-making is crucial for effective governance. Involving stakeholders ensures reliable, inclusive decisions. Structured decision management is essential for urban markets, vital for socio-economic development in towns, especially in developing countries like Uganda. Despite the benefits of participatory management, clear and transparent guidelines between vendors and market authorities are often lacking. Authorities frequently made unilateral decisions on market sales, redevelopment, and operations without involving key stakeholders. Using a descriptive case study design, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires. Results indicated that while stakeholder participation was more consolidated in implementation activities, problem rationalization and ensuring fair representation in boundary condition settings still had wide gaps. Although some collaborative initiatives were seen, the decision-making process was primarily top-down and resulted in frustration and resistance from stakeholders where inappropriate. This exclusionary strategy diminishes confidence between market authorities and vendors, hence compromising the efficacy of governance frameworks. Transitioning to a more participatory decision-making paradigm is essential for enhancing transparency, mitigating disputes, and ensuring that policies address the requirements of all market stakeholders. These findings highlight an urgent call for stakeholder inclusion in market governance to foster transparency, equity, and sustainable innovation. Tackling these challenges is key to the successful integration of vendors in management and requires structured vendor representation in decision-making forums and participatory policy frameworks to improve market governance effectiveness and boost stakeholder satisfaction. The study enhances participatory urban governance literature and provides insights for policymakers and planners to improve stakeholder engagement in urban market management.
Downloads
References
Bhuiyan, S. H., Amagoh, F. (2011). Public sector reform in Kazakhstan: issues and perspectives. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(3), 227–249.
Bovens, M. (2005). Public Accountability. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Ferlie E., Lynne L., Pollitt C., Eds.; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carroll, A. B, and Buchholtz, A. K. (2008). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cengage.
Collier, P. M. 2008. Stakeholder accountability: A field study of the implementation of a governance improvement plan. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 933 954.
Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search of the Mechanisms. Public Performance and Management Review, 28 (3), 376–417.
Freedman, R. (2002). Confucius: the golden rule. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Hansen, C. (2007). Taoism: Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Stanford: Encyclopaedia.
Katusiimeh, M. W., Oketch, C., & Mucunguzi, A. (2024). Ethical Dilemmas and Their Impact on Accountability in Local Governments: A Study of the Greater Kigezi Sub-Region in Uganda. East African Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 7(2), 256-268.
Keohane, R. O (2003). The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force. Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 24 Issue 4.
Madison, J. (1788). The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments. Library of Congress: Federalist Nos. 51-60.
Morrell, K. (2009). Governance and the public good. Public Administration, 87, 538–556
Mulgan, R. (2003). One Cheer for Hierarchy – Accountability in Disjointed Governance; Political Science, 55 (2), 6-18.
Mulgan, R. (2000). ”Accountability”: an ever-expanding concept?; Public Administration, 78 (3), 555-573.
O'Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2007). From functional to social accountability: Transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non‐governmental development organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 446-471.
Oketch C and Tumukunde A. (2013). Codes of Conduct and Administrative Accountability in Selected Local Governments in Western Uganda. International Journal for Social Science Tomorrow, Vol. 2 No.4,
Reyes, W. (2006). Leadership accountability in a globalizing world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sinclair, A. (1995). The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20 (2), 219-237.
United Nations Human Rights. (2012). Good Governance. Retrieved from: http://www.ohchr.org/en/Issues/Development/GoodGovernance/Pages/GoodGovernanceIindex.aspx
Copyright (c) 2025 Chrisostom Oketch, Katusiimeh Mesharch, Mucunguzi Abel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.