Inclusive Management Decision-Making for the Effective Governance of Urban Central Markets: A Case Study of Kabale and Mbarara Central Markets – Southwestern Uganda

Naris Ninsiima; Mesharch Walto Katusiimeh; Godfrey Barigye; Chrisostom Oketch

doi:10.37284/eajass.8.2.3034

Naris Ninsiima Kabale University
Mesharch Walto Katusiimeh, PhD Kabale University
Godfrey Barigye, PhD Kabale University
Chrisostom Oketch, PhD Kabale University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/eajass.8.2.3034

Keywords: Stakeholder, Participation, Management Decision-Making, Effective Governance, Urban Central Markets

Share Article:

Abstract

This study investigates the levels of stakeholder participation in management decision-making for the effective management of Kabale and Mbarara Central Markets in Uganda. Management decision-making is crucial for effective governance. Involving stakeholders ensures reliable, inclusive decisions. Structured decision management is essential for urban markets, vital for socio-economic development in towns, especially in developing countries like Uganda. Despite the benefits of participatory management, clear and transparent guidelines between vendors and market authorities are often lacking. Authorities frequently made unilateral decisions on market sales, redevelopment, and operations without involving key stakeholders. Using a descriptive case study design, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires. Results indicated that while stakeholder participation was more consolidated in implementation activities, problem rationalization and ensuring fair representation in boundary condition settings still had wide gaps. Although some collaborative initiatives were seen, the decision-making process was primarily top-down and resulted in frustration and resistance from stakeholders where inappropriate. This exclusionary strategy diminishes confidence between market authorities and vendors, hence compromising the efficacy of governance frameworks. Transitioning to a more participatory decision-making paradigm is essential for enhancing transparency, mitigating disputes, and ensuring that policies address the requirements of all market stakeholders. These findings highlight an urgent call for stakeholder inclusion in market governance to foster transparency, equity, and sustainable innovation. Tackling these challenges is key to the successful integration of vendors in management and requires structured vendor representation in decision-making forums and participatory policy frameworks to improve market governance effectiveness and boost stakeholder satisfaction. The study enhances participatory urban governance literature and provides insights for policymakers and planners to improve stakeholder engagement in urban market management

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.

Brown, A., Lyons, M., & Dankoco, I. (2010). Street traders and the emerging spaces for urban voice and citizenship in African cities. Urban Studies, 47(3), 666-683.

Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary conditions: What they are, how to explore them, why we need them, and when to consider them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574-609.

Conde, C., Lonsdale, K., Nyong, A., & Aguilar, I. (2005). Engaging stakeholders in the adaptation process. Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: Developing strategies, policies and measures, 47-66.

Da Cruz, N. F., Rode, P., & McQuarrie, M. (2019). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1-19.

Demediuk, P. (2008). The role of citizens in local government decision-making. Global Business & Economics Anthology, 2, 119-129.

Drucker, P.F. (1954), The Practice of Management, Harper & Row, New York, NY.

Drucker, P.F. (2007). The Essential Drucker (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429347979

Guenduez, A. A., Mettler, T., & Schedler, K. (2020). Citizen participation in smart government: A conceptual model and two IoT case studies. Beyond smart and connected governments: Sensors and the internet of things in the public sector, 189-209.

Hrabal, M., & Tuček, D. (2018). What does it mean to own a process: Defining the process owner's competencies. Fme Transactions.

Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: Can policy support programs help? Policy design and practice, 2(1), 1-14.

Hummel, C. (2017). Disobedient markets: Street vendors, enforcement, and state intervention in collective action. Comparative Political Studies, 50(11), 1524-1555.

Insch, A., & Stuart, M. (2015). Understanding resident city brand disengagement. Journal of Place Management and Development, 8(3), 172-186.

Kabeyi, M. (2019). Organizational strategic planning, implementation, and evaluation with analysis of challenges and benefits. International Journal of Applied Research and Studies, 5(6), 27-32.

Kamunyori, S. W. (2007). A Growing Space for Dialogue: The Case of Street Vending in Nairobi’s Central Business District. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Legewie, H., & Böhm, B. (2015). Moderation of Teamwork: Basics and Techniques*.

Lindell, I., Ampaire, C., & Byerley, A. (2019). Governing urban informality: re-working spaces and subjects in Kampala, Uganda. International Development Planning Review, 41(1), 63-84.

McDonald, R., & Gao, C. (2019). Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organization Science, 30(6), 1289-1318.

Mitullah, W. V. (2021). The Powers of Agenda-Setting: The Role of Politicians and Experts. Governing Kenya: Public Policy in Theory and Practice, 47-64.

Nguyen, T. D., Shih, M. H., Srivastava, D., Tirthapura, S., & Xu, B. (2021). Stratified random sampling from streaming and stored data. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 39(3), 665–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10619-020-07315-w

Pies, I., & Valentinov, V. (2024). Trade-offs in stakeholder theory: an ordonomic perspective. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(5), 975-997.

Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., De Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner‐Ries, D., ... & Van Delden, H. (2018). A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration ecology, 26, S7-S17.

Terho, H., Mero, J., Siutla, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2022). Digital content marketing in business markets: Activities, consequences, and contingencies along the customer journey. Industrial Marketing Management, 105, 294-310.

Uganda Law Reform Commission and Ministry of Local Government (2013). Annual Report. Uganda Law Reform Commission, Kampala, Uganda.

United Nations. (2011). Country Programme Document 2016 – 2021.

Waris, M., Khan, A., Abideen, A. Z., Sorooshian, S., & Ullah, M. (2022). Stakeholder Management in Public Sector Infrastructure Projects. Journal of Engineering, Project & Production Management, 12(3).

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications.

Zhuang, T., Qian, Q. K., Visscher, H. J., Elsinga, M. G., & Wu, W. (2019). The role of stakeholders and their participation network in decision-making of urban renewal in China: The case of Chongqing. Cities, 92, 47-58.