Examining the Challenges Hindering the Implementation of Community Service Sentencing for Offender Rehabilitation: Insights from Butimba Central Prison

Winstoni Leonard; Johnas Buhori; Ngondi Naftal

doi:10.37284/eajass.8.2.3003

Winstoni Leonard The Open University of Tanzania
Johnas Buhori, PhD The Open University of Tanzania
Ngondi Naftal, PhD The Open University of Tanzania

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/eajass.8.2.3003

Keywords: Community Service Sentencing, Rehabilitation Challenges, Offender Reintegration

Share Article:

Abstract

Globally, community service sentencing has been adopted as an alternative to incarceration to address prison congestion and enhance offender rehabilitation. In Tanzania, community service was introduced to reduce the overcrowding of prisons while promoting offender reintegration. This study aimed to examine the challenges of implementing community service sentencing for offender rehabilitation at Butimba Central Prison, Tanzania. The particular goals were to identify the significant factors that obstruct community service sentencing performance and explore potential solutions for improving its effectiveness. The study used the Restorative Justice Perspective as the theoretical framework and adapted the case study research design, data collected from 38 respondents through interviews and document review. Findings revealed systemic constraints, inadequate resources, weak legal enforcement, societal stigma, and stakeholder coordination as significant barriers to effective implementation. Other obstacles included inadequate monitoring mechanisms and community opposition, making rehabilitation difficult. The study proposed new policy initiatives, collaboration of the stakeholders, increased funding, and awareness creation to enhance the effectiveness of community service sentences. The study's conclusion emphasised the need for a comprehensive and sustainable framework to strengthen offender rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code

Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (2015). Restorative justice and social work: A global perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24(2), 150-162.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braithwaite, J. (2016). The role of restorative justice in reducing recidivism. Australian National University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chalmers, D., Evans, C., & Niven, C. (2013). Ethical guidelines for research with human participants. Ethics Review, 5(3), 15-29.

Commissioner's Report on Improving Criminal Justice Institutions in Tanzania. (2024). Ministry of Home Affairs

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daly, K. (2017). Restorative justice and the moral economy of crime. Contemporary Justice Review, 20(2), 139-151.

Emprechtinger, J., & Richter, M. (2023). Prison social work and the risk security system: Insights from Swiss correctional facilities. Social Work & Society, 21(2).

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A case study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80- 92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Fisher, C. B. (2017). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fundi, G., & Nyamhanga, T. (2020). Rehabilitation challenges in Tanzania’s prison system: A focus on Butimba Central Prison. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies, 5(1), 48-63.

Gavrielides, T. (2015). The role of restorative justice in reducing recidivism: Policy and practice implications. Journal of Law and Society, 42(3), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12088

Human Rights Watch. (2020). Tanzania: End inhumane treatment of prisoners. https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/12/11/tanzania-end-inhumane-treatment-prisoners

Johnson, S., Roberts, K., & Moore, T. (2020). The role of rehabilitative programs in reducing re-offending: Evidence from Tanzania's community service sentencing. Criminal Justice Review, 45(2), 116-129.

Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. (2011). Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective. Routledge.

Jones, A. (2022). The international approach to crime and justice: Shifting paradigms towards rehabilitation. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 20(3), 375-389.

Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505276969

Lead4Life. (2023). Restorative justice principles in rehabilitation: The path forward.International Journal of Restorative Justice, 12(1), 18-29. https://lead4lifeinc.org/understanding-restorative-justice/

Levenson, J. S., Prescott, D. S., & Willis, G. M. (2023). Trauma-informed treatment practices in criminal justice settings. In Handbook of Trauma and the Criminal Justice System (pp. 495-510). Springer. https://safersociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Levenson-Prescot-Willis-2022-Chapter-24.pdf

Mandiberg, J. (2010). Stigma, identity, and reintegration: The impacts of stigma on rehabilitation. In P. Williams & J. Johnson (Eds.), Rehabilitation and reentry: Understanding the challenges of offender reintegration (pp. 23-45). Oxford University Press.

Moore, K. E., Stuewig, J. B., & Tangney, J. P. (2016). The effect of stigma on criminal offenders' functioning: A longitudinal mediational model. Deviant Behavior, 37(2), 196- 218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.1004035

National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Social work speaks: National Association of Social Workers policy statements (11th ed.). NASW Press.

National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2020). Stigma, housing, and identity after prison. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7449251/

Raymond, R., Bennett, J., & Walker, T. (2018). The stigma of criminal justice: Community perceptions and reintegration outcomes. Journal of Social Justice Studies, 34(2), 119-133.

Reamer, F. G. (2020). The challenges of social work in criminal justice: Training, workload, and resources. Journal of Social Work Education, 56(2), 150-163.

Roberts, L., & Springer, M. (2019). Restorative justice in the correctional setting: Barriers and opportunities for institutional reform. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58(3), 220-241.

Rossner, M. (2013). Restorative justice and community participation: Mitigating stigmatization in reintegration. The Journal of Social Policy, 42(3), 409-421.

Sherman, L. W., & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative justice: The evidence. The Smith Institute. https://www.smith- institute.org.uk/sites/default/files/Restorative-Justice-The-Evidence.pdf

Strang, H., & Braithwaite, J. (2017). Restorative justice and its efficacy: A re-assessment. Criminal Justice Review, 42(3), 163-182.

Tanzanian Ministry of Home Affairs. (2020). Annual report on the state of prisons in Tanzania. Ministry of Home Affairs.

Thompson, N. (2019). Rehabilitation through community service: Challenges and implications for successful reintegration. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42(1), 81-98.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2018). The prevention of recidivism and the social reintegration of offenders. https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/18-02303_ebook.pdf

Van Ness, D. W., & Heetderks Strong, K. (2015). Restorative justice today: Practical applications. Sage Publications.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.

Zehr, H., & Mika, H. (1998). Fundamental concepts of restorative justice. Correctional Service Canada, 5(1), 47-49.