Discursive Construction of Sexuality among School Going Adolescents in Kenya
Abstract
Adolescents grapple with many social issues as they strive to cope with the physical, social, and emotional changes that they are experiencing. This is not made any easier by the dictates of the social cultural values in the communities they live in. However, due to socio-economic and political changes many of these values are gradually being abandoned as the adolescents negotiate for their space and construct their individualities in ways they so choose. This paper focuses on one aspect of these individualities: adolescent sexuality. The paper argues that language as an element of culture and identity is important in understanding the adolescent’s world of sexuality. Through Discourse Analysis particularly van Djik’s framework adopted from “Politics, Ideology and Discourse” this paper explores the discursive strategies in the construction of adolescents’ sexuality. Seven strategies are discussed as featuring dominantly in adolescents’ discourse on sexuality: disclaimer, authority, categorization, euphemism, metaphors, number game and hyperbole. These strategies are seen as a means by which adolescents naturalize and rationalize their sexual behaviour. It is hoped that these findings will add to the existing body of knowledge on sexuality discourse and inform stakeholders involved in designing youth sexuality programs in Kenya
Downloads
References
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2003). Face and Politeness: New (insights) for Old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics 35, 1453-1469.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Things Sorting Out. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Cameron, L. (2010). What is metaphor and why does it matter? In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis (pp. 3-25). London: Equinox.
Cense, M & Ganzevoort (2019). The Storyscapes of teenage pregnancy. On morality, embodiment and narrative agency. Journal of Youth Studies, 22:4, 568-583.
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. London: Sage.
Creswell, J.W.& Fairclough, I. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis. London, Routledge
Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Gomaa, O. F., & Shi, Y. (2012). The Linguistic of Euphemism: A Study of Euphemism Formation. Florida: University of Florida.
Halliday, M. A. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hannan, M. T., Polos, L., & Carroll, G. R. (2007). Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences codes and Ecologies. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Izugbara, C. (2005). The Socio-cultural Context of Adolescents' notions of Sex and Sexuality in Rural South-Eastern Nigeria. Sexualities, Vol. 8 no. 5, 600-617.
Jerrold, S. G., Clint, E. B., & Sara, B. O. (2016). Exploring the Dimensions of Human Sexuality. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett.
KNBS. (2011). Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved from knbs.or.ke: http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2008/kenya.aspx
Lakoff, G. &M. Turner. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
National Council for Population and Development. (2015). National Adolescents and Youth Survey. Nairobi.
National Council for Population and Development. (2011). State of Kenya Population Nairobi.
Norrick, N. R. (2004). Hyperbole, extre,e case formulation. Journal of Pragmatics 36 (9), 1727-1739.
Ogechi, N. (2005). The Language of Sex and HIV/AIDS among University Students. Wiener Kritische Aftikastudien 9 (5), 123-149.
Rice, F. (2001). Human Development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall NJ7.
Underhill, J. (2010). Creating W orldviews: Metaphor, Ideology and Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
van Djik, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society 4 (2), 249-283.
van Djik, T. A. (2005). Webstite of Teun A. van Djik. Retrieved from http://www.discourses.org/Old Articles/Politics,%20Ideology%20and %20Discourse.pdf
van Djik, T. A. (2006). Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse and Society, 359-383.
van Djik, T. A. (2011). Discourse and Society. Retrieved from Website of Teun A. van Djik: http://www.discourses.org/OldAticles/Discourse%20and%20Ideology.pdf
Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in Discourse and Communication. Discourse and Communication 1 (1), 91-112.
Ward, L. (2004). And TV Makes three: Comparing Contributions of Parents, Peers and the Media to Sexual Socialization, In A. Merriwether, & L. M Ward (Eds), From Attitudes to Behaviour: Exploring the Dynamics of Sexual Socialization. Baltimore: MD.
Warren, B. (1991). What Euphemisms Tell Us about the Interpretation of Words. A Journal of General Linguistics 46 (2), 128-172.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weinstein, E., & Reosen, E. (1991). The Development of Adolescent Sexual Intimacy: Implications for Counselling. Journal of Adolescence 26, 331-340.
World Health Organization. (2011). Youth and Health Risks. Geneva.
World Health Organization, (2002). Defining Sexual Health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. Geneva.
World Health Organization, (2014). Health for the world’s adolescents: A second chance in the second decade. Geneva.
Zhang, M. (2014). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Political News Reports. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2237-2277
Copyright (c) 2022 Raphael Mwaura Gacheiya, PhD, Catherine Wawasi Kitetu, PhD, Jonathan Furaha Chai, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
