A Frame Analysis of President Uhuru Kenyatta’s Madaraka, Mashujaa and Jamhuri Day Speeches

  • Raphael Mwaura Gacheiya, PhD Egerton University
Keywords: National Holiday, Frame Analysis, Framing, Constitutive, Narration, Rhetoric
Share Article:


Almost every country in the world observes a national holiday in honour of an important event in the historical life of the nation. Notably, national holiday discourses reveal fundamental aspects of a nation and its attributes. Consequently, national holiday speeches by Presidents and other political leaders emerge as a valuable site for linguistic analysis. This paper, through the Voyant tool, a digital humanity text analysis method complemented by Fairhurst and Sarr’s framing techniques theory, presents a linguistic examination of three of President Uhuru Kenyatta’s speeches in the year 2020 during three Kenyan national holidays. These national holidays (Madaraka Day, Mashujaa Day, and Jamhuri Day) are significant in Kenyan history and provide an opportunity to reflect on the social attributes of Kenyans as a people. Further, they guide the young generation about the values and messages associated with these days. These three speeches were made in the year 2020, which was characterized by the coronavirus pandemic and the year when the President was coming close to the end of his final term and was, therefore, concerned about his legacy. These two aspects (pandemic and legacy) imbued the speeches with particular qualities. The paper postulates that Uhuru Kenyatta’s speeches are a manifestation of political, economic, and constitutive frames narrated in an episodic way. Further, the narration is a rich linguistic ground for understanding the government’s agenda. The President was found to utilize different framing strategies such as metaphors, comparison, spin, and slogans in his narration”


Download data is not yet available.


Beard A. (2000). The language of politics. Routledge.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fairhurst, G. T., & Sarr, R. A. (1996). The art of framing: Managing the language of leadership (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Gabriella, E. (2019). Symbols of nations and nationalism: celebrating nationhood. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gatheru R. M. (2005). Kenya: from colonization to independence 1888-1970. McFarland.

Hammer, S. (2010). The role of narrative in political campaigning: An analysis of speeches by Barack Obama. National Identities, 12(3), 269.

Hornsby, Charles. (2011). Kenya: A History Since Independence. 10.5040/9780755619023.

Karimi, Faith (March 30 2013). “President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta of Kenya a man of complexities - CNN.com”

Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. (1990). Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives. New York: Basic.

McQuail, Denis. 2010. McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Natalie Moss & Alasdair O’Hare (2014) Staging democracy: Kenya’s televised Presidential debates, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 8:1, 78-92, DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2013.869929

Opeibi, Tunde. (2008). Language, Politics and Democratic Governance in Nigeria: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Issues in Political Discourse Analysis. 2. 207-226.

Opeibi, Tunde. (2015). Language in the Service of Democracy in Nigeria: A Discourse Study of the Resignation Address of Mr. Honourable Speaker. Research in English and Applied Linguistics. Volume 9. 212-231.

Osborne, M. (2014). [Review of Kenya: A History since Independence, by C. Hornsby]. The International Journal of African Historical Studies, 47(1), 161–163. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24393346

Schaffer, Frederic & Gagnon, Jean-Paul. (2023). Democracies Across Cultures: The Hegemonic Concept of Democracy has Dissolved, What Happens Now? Democratic Theory. 10. 91-104.

14 October, 2023
How to Cite
Gacheiya, R. (2023). A Frame Analysis of President Uhuru Kenyatta’s Madaraka, Mashujaa and Jamhuri Day Speeches. East African Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 6(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajass.6.2.1513