Modernizing the Kenyan Electoral System through Polkadot Blockchain Network
The 2007/8 post-election violence in Kenya brought the nascent Kenyan democracy to the brink of collapse. It anachronistically demonstrated that old ways of managing elections were being antiquated by new realities, such as a growing population, the need for technological support, and the immediacy of a supportive electoral legal regime. A decade and a half after the posthumous murder of Kenyans during the 2007 disputed election, Kenya is leapfrogging and sauntering to establish a vibrant democracy, albeit with specific challenges. Firstly, the presidential elections have been disputed thrice after the promulgation of the constitution in 2010. And secondly, the allegation of voter fraud against the electoral body is imminent. Further, public trust in the electoral body is low and has been so since the advent of pluralism politics in 1991. Besides, the electoral body gets overwhelmed by the number of elections they manage during the general elections, and technological failures have been a significant impediment. Ostensibly, these challenges compound an existing problem of mistrust among political players and gather moss, especially during the period between the end of the voting exercise and the announcement of presidential results by the electoral body. Erstwhile, such a fragile situation manifested and threatened public safety after the 2013, 2017, and 2022 general elections. However, despite scepticism, the finality of the supreme court process as an arbitrator of the disputed presidential elections has played a role in quelling violence and settling such matters. In this article, the author argues that the maturation of digital democracies and the incorporation of blockchain technologies can modernize grassroots elections and resolve allegations of voter fraud.
Barkan, J. D., & Ng'ethe, N. (1998). African Ambiguities: Kenya Tries Again. Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 32-48.
Commonwealth Observer Group, (2013). Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group: Kenya General Elections. https://thecommonwealth.org/sites/default/files/news-items/documents/130411.pdf
Egiyi, M. A., & Ofoegbu, G. N. (2020). Cryptocurrency and climate change: An overview. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), 11(3), 15-22.
Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018). The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics, 2(1), 2.
Jafar, U., Aziz, M. J. A., & Shukur, Z. (2021). Blockchain for Electronic Voting System—Review and Open Research Challenges. Sensors, 21(17), 1-22.
Juma, J., & Oguk, C. O. (2020). Election results' verification in e-voting systems in Kenya: a review.
Khazaei, H. (2020). Integrating cognitive antecedents to the UTAUT model to explain the adoption of blockchain technology among Malaysian SMEs. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 4(2), 85-90.
Kshetri, N., & Voas, J. (2018). Blockchain-enabled e-voting. Ieee Software, 35(4), 95-99.
Long, J. D. (2008). Electoral fraud and the erosion of democratic gains in Kenya. Working Group in African Political Economy (WGAPE) Paper prepared for the Working Group in African Political Economy (WGAPE), 1-45.
Mariwa, F. (2019). Internet access: How rural Kenya is keeping pace. https://www.dw.com/en/internet-access-how-rural-kenya-is-keeping-pace/a-47071209
Marwa, R. (2022). The Competence of the Electoral Commission to conduct Free and Fair Elections in Tanzania: A Legal Analysis. J. Pol. & L., 15, 54.
Mebane Jr, W. R. (2017). Anomalies and frauds (?) in the Kenya 2017 presidential election. Working paper.
Nguyen, T. (2018). West Virginia to offer mobile blockchain voting app for overseas voters in November election. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/08/10/west-virginia-pilots-mobile-blockchain-voting-app-overseas-voters-november-election/
Nyabola, N. (2018). Digital democracy, analogue politics: How the Internet era is transforming politics in Kenya. Zed Books Ltd.
Perper, R. (2018). Sierra Leone just became the first country in the world to use blockchain during an election. https://www.businessinsider.com/sierra-leone-blockchain-elections-2018-3?r=US&IR=T
Society for International Development, (2015). New Constitution, Same Old Challenges: Reflections on Kenya's 2013 General Elections. https://uraia.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/SIDElectionsBook2013.pdf
Steinbrenner, M., (2022). Blockchain & Sustainability. https://neosfer.de/en/blockchain-sustainability/
Tan, A., (2018). Thailand’s Democrat Party holds election with blockchain. https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252452435/Thailands-Democrat-Party-holds-election-with-blockchain
The Carter Center, (2018). Kenya 2017 General and Presidential Elections. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/kenya-2017-final-election-report_0.pdf
Tseng, S. & Fogg, B.J. (1999). Credibility and Computing Technology. Commun. ACM 1999, 42, 39–44
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478.
Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, M. M. (2019). The role of social influence in blockchain adoption: The Brazilian supply chain case. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 1715-1720.
Yusof, H., Munir, M. F. M. B., Zolkaply, Z., Jing, C. L., Hao, C. Y., Ying, D. S., ... & Leong, T. K. (2018). Behavioural intention to adopt blockchain technology: Viewpoint of the banking institutions in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, 3(10), 274-279.
Copyright (c) 2023 Richard Kyalo Mutuku
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.