Examining the Effect of Policy Evaluation Practices on the Performance of Public Institutions in South Sudan
Abstract
This study examines how policy evaluation practices influence the performance of the Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs in South Sudan. The Ministry faces significant recruitment and selection challenges due to limited infrastructure, resources, and a developing education system, challenges that are intensified by the country's post-conflict environment. To explore these issues, the research employed a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys with 342 respondents (response rate: 85.9%) and qualitative data from 30 key informant interviews using semi-structured protocols. The theoretical framework integrated Institutional Theory, which explains how organisational norms shape policy practices; Policy Implementation Theory, focusing on the processes affecting policy delivery; and Resource Dependency Theory, highlighting how resource constraints influence organisational behaviour. These theories guided the development of measurement tools and interpretation of results, especially regarding the impact of institutional and resource factors on policy evaluation effectiveness. Quantitative analysis using regression modelling at a 5% significance level (p<0.05) revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.692) between policy evaluation practices and organisational performance, with an R² of 0.479. This indicates that nearly 48% of performance variability can be explained by the extent of policy evaluation efforts. The findings emphasise the crucial role of systematic evaluation mechanisms in enhancing organisational outcomes. The study recommends strengthening policy evaluation frameworks, investing in education and infrastructure, establishing regular monitoring and feedback systems, and enhancing capacity-building for personnel involved in policy evaluation. Additionally, stakeholder engagement and performance-based incentives are suggested to further improve policy impact. Future research should explore how contextual factors such as post-conflict recovery, political stability, and external support influence policy evaluation effectiveness. Overall, this research provides empirical evidence supporting systematic policy evaluation as vital for improving organisational performance and stability in fragile states like South Sudan.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095103
Gachugi, G., Karanja, S., & Njoroge, L. (2022). Challenges faced by public institutions in South Sudan: A focus on capacity building. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(4), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2021-0078
Ghere, G., Ochieng, N., & Otieno, S. (2020). Challenges in policy evaluation in developing countries: A case of Kenya. African Journal of Public Administration and Management, 12(3), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPAM2020.0890
Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The institutional work of leading organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.19379615
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2002). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. South-Western College Publishing.
Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). How organizational contexts influence change strategies: The case of total quality management. Organization Science, 12(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.63.10104
Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2019). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. World Bank Publications.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Institutional environments and organizations. Sage Publications.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Mazmanian, D. A. (1983). Policy implementation and public policy theory. Policy Studies Journal, 11(4), 531–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1983.tb00184.x
UNESCO. (2020). Education in South Sudan: Challenges and prospects. UNESCO Report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374882
Weiss, C. H. (2017). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies. Princeton University Press.
World Bank. (2020). South Sudan development update: Building resilience. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1574-0
World Bank. (2021). South Sudan Public Sector Capacity Assessment. World Bank Report. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/xxxxx
Wang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2018). Effectiveness of water pollution control measures in China: A mixed-methods approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 87, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.003
Copyright (c) 2025 Atem Madut Yaak Kur, Kadian Wanyonyi Wanyama, PhD, Maxwell Adea, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
