An Assessment of Rural Youth Participation in Community Development Projects in Turkana South Sub-County: An Approach to Community Development and Sustainable Development
The integration of local and international cultures enhances people’s ability to adapt to external influences of sustainable aid and sustainable development programs and processes. The study was conducted in Turkana, where government intervention on projects was made with deliberate efforts to implement inclusive development projects. Traditionally Turkana society has well-defined gender roles that appear to contradict inclusive and participatory approaches determined by government projects and interventions. The study sought to establish a legitimate influence on youth participation and to assess the impact of cultural norms on youth participation in community projects. The study used a descriptive design and targeted 47,359 young people. The study used Krejecie and Morgan’s table and an equally divided sample procedure to obtain a sample of 381 respondents in the study. Research has shown that educated youth will speak well and seek citizenship, and show that the standard of formal education is negatively correlated (-0251) with youth participation in project planning and community development projects (-0.094) respectively, barriers to youth participation in project planning are not limited to learning and training. Therefore political, institutional, financial and technical factors played out in determining whose voice is heard and which decisions are acceptable. There was an inconsistent balance (-0.109) between gender roles and participation in community project planning meetings and gender issues consideration in community projects, respectively. A negative correlation (-0.14) between age and meeting planning has been revealed which means that the patriarchal values system in rural areas favours gender roles and traditional cultural practices that oppose the development, advancement and participation of women in community development.
Abel, T. D., & Stephan, M. (2000). The limits of civic environmentalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(4), 614-628.
Adekunle, O. A., Adefalu, L. L., Oladipo, F. O., Adisa, R. S., & Fatoye, A. D. (2009). Constraints to youths’ involvement in agricultural production in Kwara State, Nigeria. Journal of agricultural extension, 13(1).
African Youth Report (2011). Addressing the Youth Education and Employment Nexus in the New Global Economy. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.
Akinboye, O. A., Ayanwuyi, E., Kuponiyi, F. A., & Oyetoro, J. (2007). Factors affecting youth participation in community development in Remo North Government Area of Ogun State. The Social Sciences, 2(3), 307-311.
Angba, A. O., Adesope, O. M., & Aboh, C. L. (2009). Effect of socioeconomic characteristics of rural youths on their attitude towards participation in community development projects. International NGO Journal, 4(8), 348-351.
Burton, P. (2009). Conceptual, theoretical and practical issues in measuring the benefits of public participation. Evaluation, 15(3), 263-284.
Government of Kenya. (2006). Kenya National Youth Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports.
Government of Kenya. (2010). The Constitution of Kenya. Nairobi: Government Printer.
Hope Sr, K. R. (2012). Engaging the youth in Kenya: empowerment, education, and employment. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 17(4), 221-236.
Jivetti, B., Njororai, F., & Simiyu, W. (2016). Challenges Facing Rural Youth and Young Adults and How Development Stakeholders Can Alleviate Those Hardships in Kenya. Youth Voice Journal.
John, P. (2009). Can citizen governance redress the representative bias of political participation? Public administration review, 69(3), 494-503.
Kumar, S. (2002). Methods for community participation. A complete guide for practitioners. London: ITDG Publishing.
Masanyiwa, Z. S. & Kinyashi, G. F. (2008). Analysis of community Participation in Projects managed by Non-Governmental Organisations. Institute of Rural Development and Planning (IRDP).
Mboga, H. (2009). Understanding the Local Government System in Kenya. A Citizen’s Handbook. Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA)
Merzel, C., & D’Afflitti, J. (2003). Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. American journal of public health, 93(4), 557-574.
Mohamud A, Muturi W & Samantar M, (2018). Factors Influencing Youth Participation in Community Initiatives of Garowe District. International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research.
Mulwa, F. W. (2008). Demystifying Participatory Community development (4th ed). Nairobi Paulines Publications Africa.
Mutua, J. (2013). The Influence of Culture in the operation of Selected Multinationals in Kenya. MBA thesis, University of Nairobi.
Oduor, C., & Muriu, A. R. (2013). Opportunities for youth to engage in devolved governance and economic development in Kenya. The Futures Bulletin, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).
Onu, G. (1988). Accountability and efficiency: Formal controls and performance management in Nigeria local government system. International Social Science Journal, 3, 155-176.
Perold, H. (2006, November). Volunteering as a strategy to foster civic participation among youth in southern Africa. In Presentation made to XIX IAVE World Volunteer Conference on Volunteering for Peace in Multicultural Societies, Delhi (pp. 10-13).
Robinson, V. M. J. (2007). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: making sense of the evidence. The Leadership Challenge: Improving Learning in Schools. In Conference Proceedings of the ACER Research Conference (pp. 12-16).
Samah, A. A., & Aref, F. (2009). People’s participation in community development: A case study in a planned village settlement in Malaysia. World Rural Observations, 1(2), 45-54.
Sherrod, L. R., Flanagan, C., & Youniss, J. (2002). Dimensions of citizenship and opportunities for youth development: The what, why, when, where, and who of citizenship development. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 264-272.
Simmons, R., Birchall, J., & Prout, A. (2012). User involvement in public services: ‘Choice about Voice.’ Public Policy and Administration, 27(1), 3-29.
Sulo, T., Chumo, C., Tuitoek, D., & Iagat, J. (2012). Assessment of youth opportunities in the dairy sector in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(4), 332-338.
Thai, S., Seng, S., & Panha, S. (2015). Youth Employment in Cambodia: Trends, Challenges, and Policy Responses. Mekong Economic Research Network.
Thomas, M., & Thomas, M. J. (2007). Enhancing community participation in programmes in developing countries. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal (DINF), 1.
Torney-Purta, J., Damon, W., Casey-Cannon, S., Gardner, J., Gonzalez, R., Moore, M., & Wong, C. (2000). Creating citizenship: Youth development for free and democratic society: A conference consensus document. Stanford Center on Adolescence the University of Maryland Civil Society Initiative.
Tufte, T. & Mefalopulos, P. (2009). Participatory Communication: A practical Guide. World Bank Working Paper No. 170. World Bank
Varughese, G., & Ostrom, E. (2001). The contested role of heterogeneity in collective action: some evidence from community forestry in Nepal. World Development, 29(5), 747-765.
Weber, E. P. (2000). A new vanguard for the environment: Grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement. Society & Natural Resources, 13(3), 237-259.
World Bank. (2002). Globalisation, Growth, and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy. Washington D.C., World Bank & Oxford University Press.
Zeldin, S., Camino, L., & Calvert, M. (2007). Toward an understanding of youth in community governance: Policy priorities and research directions. Análise Psicológica, 25(1), 77-95.
Zhong, Z. J. (2014). Civic engagement among educated Chinese youth: The role of SNS (Social Networking Services), bonding and bridging social capital. Computers & Education, 75, 263-273.
Copyright (c) 2020 Otieno Evans Ochieng, Maria Adhiambo Onyango, PhD, Zachary Omambia Kinaro, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.