Ecological Responses of Macroinvertebrates to an In-Stream Ecosystem Restoration Technique in a Tropical Stream in Eastern Uganda

  • Remigio Turyahabwe Busitema University
  • Andrew Mulabbi Muni University
  • Joyfred Asaba Kyambogo university
  • Moses Olowo Busitema University
Keywords: Assemblage, Metrics, Feeding Group, Sampling Plots, Taxonomic Composition
Share Article:


A field experiment was conducted to examine the ecological responses of macroinvertebrates to an in-stream ecosystem restoration technique called woody debris introduced in a stream in different arrangements to show how they (woody debris) affected the macroinvertebrate ecology, specifically assemblage composition and biometrics in River Nabongo. The experiment was carried out in two heterogeneous stream environments i.e., i) in a riffle found in the middle reaches of the river at a higher altitude and ii) a pool in the lower altitude and reaches of the river. Each of these two treatments had a control plot for comparison purposes. Four macroinvertebrate sampling campaigns were launched in experimental sites from September 2019 to April 2021. All restoration structures had more macroinvertebrates than control and pre-treatment sites. The introduction of simple structures at the riffle site led to an increase in collector-filterers from 9-128 individuals, while at the pool site all the structures increased macroinvertebrates by 1151 individuals. Taxon richness was highest in the complex plot with 14±0.41 which significantly differed from the rest of the sampling plots at P<0.05. The relative abundance of taxa at the pool site varied significantly from one sampling plot to another at P<0.05 with the highest mean abundance registered in complex and simple structures having 61.3±0.10 and 23.5±0.11 respectively. It was concluded that complex woody debris structures increase the diversity, abundance and richness of aquatic macroinvertebrates by providing hard substrates for colonization by algae and microorganisms on which macroinvertebrates feed. We recommended that other researchers should study the impact of other in-stream ecosystem restoration techniques such as floating islands, constructed wetlands, D-deflectors, a comparison of which with restored woody debris will enable ecologists to choose the most suitable technique to apply at different stream points.


Download data is not yet available.


Benke, A. C., Henry III, R. L., Gillespie, D. M., & Hunter, R. J. (1985). Importance of snag habitat for animal production in southeastern streams. Fisheries, 10(5), 8-13.

Benke, A., & Wallace, J. B. (2010). Influence of wood on invertebrate communities in streams and rivers. In In: Gregory, SV; Boyer, KL; Gurnell, AM eds. The ecology and management of wood in world rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37: Bethesda, Maryland. p. 149-177. (Vol. 37, pp. 149-177).

Bilby, R. E. (2003). Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of wood in streams and rivers. In American Fisheries Society Symposium (Vol. 37, pp. 135-147).

Bowen, K. L., Kaushik, N. K., & Gordon, A. M. (1998). Macroinvertebrate communities and biofilm chlorophyll on woody debris in two Canadian oligotrophic lakes. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 257-281.

Brooks, A. P., Gehrke, P. C., Jansen, J. D., & Abbe, T. B. (2004). Experimental reintroduction of woody debris on the Williams River, NSW: geomorphic and ecological responses. River Research and Applications, 20(5), 513-536.

Collier, K. J., & Halliday, J. N. (2000). Macroinvertebrate-wood associations during decay of plantation pine in New Zealand pumice-bed streams: stable habitat or trophic subsidy? Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 19(1), 94-111.

Francis, T. B., Schindler, D. E., Fox, J. M., & Seminet-Reneau, E. (2007). Effects of urbanization on the dynamics of organic sediments in temperate lakes. Ecosystems, 10(7), 1057-1068.

Gerhard, M., & Reich, M. (2000). Restoration of streams with large wood: effects of accumulated and built‐in wood on channel morphology, habitat diversity and aquatic fauna. International Review of Hydrobiology: A Journal Covering all Aspects of Limnology and Marine Biology, 85(1), 123-137.

Gurnell, A. M., Piégay, H., Swanson, F. J., & Gregory, S. V. (2002). Large wood and fluvial processes. Freshwater Biology, 47(4), 601-619.

Hynes, H. B. N., & Hynes, H. B. N. (1970). The ecology of running waters (Vol. 555). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Leal, C. C. (2012). The effects of restored aquatic large woody debris structures on invertebrate populations in the Napa River. San Jose State University.

Lehtinen, R. M., Mundahl, N. D., & Madejczyk, J. C. (1997). Autumn use of woody snags by fishes in backwater and channel border habitats of a large river. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 49(1), 07-19.

Lemly, A. D., & Hilderbrand, R. H. (2000). Influence of large woody debris on stream insect communities and benthic detritus. Hydrobiologia, 421(1), 179-185.

Mathooko, J. M., & Otieno, C. O. (2002). Does surface textural complexity of woody debris in lotic ecosystems influence their colonization by aquatic invertebrates?. Hydrobiologia, 489(1), 11-20.

Merritt, R. W., & Cummins, K. W. (Eds.). (1996). An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall Hunt.

Minello, T. J., & Zimmerman, R. J. (1983). Fish predation on juvenile brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus Ives: the effect of simulated Spartina structure on predation rates. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 72(3), 211-231.

NEMA, (2008), The state of environment report for Uganda, NEMA Kampala, Uganda

NEMA. (2004). The state of environment report for Uganda, NEMA Kampala, Uganda

O’Connor, N. A. (1992). Quantification of submerged wood in a lowland Australian stream system. Freshwater Biology, 27(3), 387-395.

O'Connor, N. A. (1991). The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonising wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia, 85(4), 504-512.

Ogren, S. A., & King, D. K. (2008). The effect of large woody debris on macroinvertebrate communities and epilithon detritus composition in a channelized headwater stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 23(1), 65-77.

Phillips, E. C., & Kilambi, R. V. (1994). Use of coarse woody debris by Diptera in Ozark streams, Arkansas. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 13(2), 151-159.

Roni, P., Beechie, T. J., Bilby, R. E., Leonetti, F. E., Pollock, M. M., & Pess, G. R. (2002). A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 22(1), 1-20.

Schneider, K. N., & Winemiller, K. O. (2008). Structural complexity of woody debris patches influences fish and macroinvertebrate species richness in a temperate floodplain-river system. Hydrobiologia, 610(1), 235-244.

Shannon, C.E. & Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

Shields, F. D., Knight, S. S., Morin, N., & Blank, J. (2003). Response of fishes and aquatic habitats to sand-bed stream restoration using large woody debris. Hydrobiologia, 494(1), 251-257.

Turyahabwe, R., Mulinya, C., & Shivoga, W. A. (2020), Influence of land use/cover on water quality in the River Sironko catchment area, Eastern Uganda. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT), 14(8), 26-36.

Wallace, J. B., Eggert, S. L., Meyer, J. L., & Webster, J. R. (1999). Effects of resource limitation on a detrital‐based ecosystem. Ecological monographs, 69(4), 409-442.

Willis, S. C., Winemiller, K. O., & Lopez-Fernandez, H. (2005). Habitat structural complexity and morphological diversity of fish assemblages in a Neotropical floodplain river. Oecologia, 142(2), 284-295.

1 September, 2021
How to Cite
Turyahabwe, R., Mulabbi, A., Asaba, J., & Olowo, M. (2021). Ecological Responses of Macroinvertebrates to an In-Stream Ecosystem Restoration Technique in a Tropical Stream in Eastern Uganda. East African Journal of Environment and Natural Resources, 3(1), 129-144.