Genre Patterns across Alur folktales: An exploration of the generic structure

  • Cwinya’ay Unega Makerere University
Keywords: Alur folktales, Generic structure, Stages, Abstract, Orientation, Complication, Evaluation, Resolution, Coda
Share Article:

Abstract

Alur folktales are an orature narrative genre. They exhibit numerous genre patterns that are crucial in defining their genre identity. However, although Alur folktales have been narrated for ages, little is known about the genre patterns characterising them. This paper was limited to the investigation of the generic structure pattern of Alur folktales. The generic structure describes functional component parts that sequence the text in phases and stages. The study employed a qualitative descriptive design to characterise the stages, the specific functions they perform in the folktales, and their organisational patterns. The study is underpinned by the Systemic Functional Linguistics approach to genre theory (SFL hereafter). Within SFL, genre analysis is adopted as a methodological framework to examine the generic structure of Alur folktales. Two models of genre analysis are used to analyse the generic structure of Alur folktales: the Labovian narrative structure analysis and Hassan’s Generic Structure Potential (GSP). Four Alur folktales selected purposively from a corpus of 51 folktales collected through audio recording were analysed: Diel gikud urombo (a goat and a sheep), Gwenu giku Kalanga (a hen and a groundnut), Piny mamako dano (an abductor), and Pirang’o thwon gweno gikud ulik dong gitiye jurimo ungo (Why a bat and a rooster are no longer friends). The study findings reveal that Alur folktales consist of six stages (abstract, orientation, complication, evaluation, resolution, and coda). However, the folktales display various stage patterns. Findings also suggest that in Alur folktales, abstract, orientation, and complication stages are obligatory. Evaluation, resolution, and coda are optional. Orientation, complication, evaluation, and resolution are recursive.  Therefore, it can be contended that the generic structure of Alur folktales is variable. The study recommends putting the generic structure at the heart of folktale narrative genre analysis because it reveals the folktale narrative genre’s nature and unveils its semantic structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akerejola, E. S. (2012). Multimodality in Òkó folktale discourse and its sociosemiotic purposes in

Bowcher W (ed) Multimodal texts from around the world: Cultural and linguistic insights, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, 11-38.

Alenizi, A. (2020). Internal structure of oral narrative in Arabic. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 2059–2076

Atido, G. P. (2011). Insights from Proverbs of the Alur in the Democratic Republic of Congo. www.Afriprov.org.

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman.

Bhatia, V.K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. Continuum.

Butler, C. S. (2003). Structure and function: From clause to discourse and beyond. John Benjamins Publishing, 2.

Campbell, Y. M., Ghazali, K. & Sahuri, S. S. S. (2018). Establishing the generic structure potential of Bidayuh Bau-Jagoi oral folk narratives, Dondan. Issues in Language Studies,7(2), 55-72.

Connor, U., Upton, T. A., & Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Introduction to Move Analysis. In D.

Biber, U. Connor, & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure (pp. 23-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dalimunte, A.A. & Pramoolsook, I. (2020). Genres classification and generic structures in the

English language textbooks of economics and Islamic economics in an Indonesian University LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(1).

Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group.

Flowerdew, J. (2012). Discourse in English language education. Routledge. Herman, D., Jahn, M., & Ryan, M. L. (2010). Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. Routledge.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Georgakopoulou, Α. & Goutsos, D. (2004). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). The language of science. Continuum.

Hanganu, E. C. (2014). Generic structures and their functions Text and Context Interdependence. academia.edu.

Hasan, R. (1984). The nursery tale as a genre. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 13, 71-102.

Herman, D., Jahn, M., & Ryan, M. L. (2010). Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. Routledge.

Hyvärinen, M. (2012). Prototypes, Genres, and Concepts: Travelling with Narratives Narrative Matters, 2(1), 10–32.

Imtihani, N. (2010). Genre analysis in the frame of Systemic Functional Linguistics Humaniora 22(1)86-93.

Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. Language in the Inner City. Pennsylvania University Press. 354–96.

Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative Analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative & Life History, 7(1-4), 3–38.

Lambrou M (2005) Story patterns in oral narratives: a variationist critique of Labov and Waltezky’s model of narrative schemas. Phd thesis, Middlesex University, UK.

Leedy, J.E. & Ormrod, P.D. (2021). Practical research: planning and design (12th edition) Pearson Education Limited.

Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Martin, J.R. (2009). Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change.http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/29390

Miller, C. R. (2014). Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, (70), 151–176.

Moshe, S-S. (2013). Narrativity and textuality in the study of stories Workshop on Computational

Models of Narrative Editors: Mark A. Finlayson, Bernhard Fisseni, Benedikt Löwe, and Jan Christoph Meister; 228–237 Open Access Series in Informatics.

Muhammad, T. K., Azhar, P., & Shahid, A. (2021). Mapping schematic structures in narratives: A Genre-based approach, PJAEE, 18(10), 97-109.

Omoniyi, A.M. & Akinseye, T.A. (2020). Generic structure potential (GSP) and discourse features in selected banking discourses in Ibadan, Oyo state. Nigeria International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research 8, (4), 59-93.

Paltridge, B. (1994). Genre Analysis and the Identification of Textual Boundaries Applied Linguistics,15(3), 288-299.

Paltridge, B. (1994). Genre and the Language Learning Classroom.University of Michigan Press. ISBN: 9780472088041 DOI:10.3998/mpub.23749

Porto, M. D. & Belmonte, I. A. (2014). From local to global: Visual strategies of glocalization in digital storytelling Language & Communication (39),14–23.

Reisigl, M. (2021) “‘Narrative!” I can’t hear that anymore’. A linguistic critique of an overstretched umbrella term in cultural and social science studies, discussed with the example of the discourse on climate change. Critical Discourse Studies,18 (3), 368-386.

Rose, D. (2011). Genre in the Sydney School in J Gee & M Handford (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 209-225.

Rustipa, K. (2011). Features of English learners’ narratives. Dinamika Bahasa danIlmuBudaya, academia.edu.

Simpson, P. (2005). Labov’s narrative model. Stylistics. Routledge

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. English in Academic & Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J.M. (2004). Research Genres: Exploration and Application. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827

Tejada, H., Olmedo, C. M., Robayo, F. (2017). Genre Analysis Applied to Two Textual Patterns for an English for Specific Purposes Course ESP Folios, 46,

Tokunaga, A. (2013). The Generic structure of a personal story: An overview of the Labovian model of narrative analysis. omu.repo.nii.ac.jp.

Van Mol, M. and O’Donnell, M. (1993). Automatic recognition of generic structure: medical discharge notices. In D. Banks. (Ed.). Text and Texture: Systemic Functional Viewpoints on the Nature and Structure of Text. (p. 138-141). Paris: L’Harmattan.

Zein, T., Sinar, T., Nurlela, N., & Yusuf, M. (2019). The Incomplete linguistic features and schematic structure in EFL university students’ narrative texts. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 203-209.

Wikipedia (2025). Alur people and their culture.

Published
21 July, 2025
How to Cite
Unega, C. (2025). Genre Patterns across Alur folktales: An exploration of the generic structure. East African Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 8(2), 760-776. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajass.8.2.3360