Effect of Two Years of Conservation Agricultural Practices on Weed Seed Banks Evaluated Using Three Techniques
Abstract
Understanding the soil seed bank is very important when developing integrated weed management technologies and detecting the influence of crop management practices on weeds. In conventional weed control, farmers tend to focus on the above-ground, yet the above-ground vegetation is related to the below-ground soil seed bank. Several soil seed bank estimation methods have been used to estimate the soil seed bank, but varying results have been obtained under different field management practices and soil depths. In this study, we compared three methods for estimating the soil seed bank: seedling emergence method and two direct seed extraction methods (floatation and cloth bag) for determining weed seed density and diversity from different soil depths under conservation farming practices. The three methods had significant differences in estimating weed densities from the soil seed bank (p<0.001). The greenhouse seedling emergence method had a mean number of 5.06, cloth bag had 4.07 while floatation method had the lowest number of 3.38 per 300g of soil. The mean highest weed density was obtained from soil depth of 0-15 cm (5 weeds/300g vs 1.6 weeds/300g of soil from 15-30 cm depth). For soil seed bank diversity, cloth bag method had the highest mean value followed by greenhouse emergence and lastly floatation method with Simpsons diversity index of 2.72, 1.79 and 1.31, respectively. Shannon Weiner diversity index followed the same pattern for the three methods. The methods had different sensitivity to density and diversity and therefore greenhouse emergence method should always be combined with cloth bag method. The greenhouse emergency method detected a total of 26 weed species, cloth bag detected 22 weed species and Floatation method detected 18 weed species. Despite, the greenhouse emergence method detecting more species than the cloth bag at 26 and 22 weed species, respectively, it had a lower Simpson’s diversity index than the cloth bag method due to lower species evenness. Sampling of the entire soil plough layer of 0-30 cm depth for disturbed agricultural soils may produce the best results. Seasons significantly influenced soil seed bank diversity and not soil seed bank density where second season (B) significantly increased soil seed bank diversity. Soil cover practice through intercropping maize with soybean significantly reduced soil seed bank density and not diversity in both minimum and conventional tilled plots. This positive influence on weed density and diversity is a good indicator for integration into a weed management program
Downloads
References
Adeux, G., Munier-Jolain, N., Meunier, D., Farcy, P., Carlesi, S., Barberi, P., & Cordeau, S. (2019). Diversified grain-based cropping systems provide long-term weed control while limiting herbicide use and yield losses. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39, 1–13.
Adeux, G., Yvoz, S., Biju-Duval, L., Cadet, E., Farcy, P., Fried, G., Guillemin, J.-P., Meunier, D., Munier-Jolain, N., & Petit, S. (2022). Cropping system diversification does not always beget weed diversity. European Journal of Agronomy, 133, 126438.
Andreasen, C., Jensen, H. A., & Jensen, S. M. (2018). Decreasing diversity in the soil seed bank after 50 years in Danish arable fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 259, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.034
Anyoni, O. G., Susan, T., Joseph, E., Barnabas, M., & Alfred, O. (2023). Effects of Intercropping on Maize and Soybean Yield Performance, Land Equivalent Ratio, and Maize Leaf Area in Conservation Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Science, 16(1).
Auškalnienė, O., Kadžienė, G., Janušauskaitė, D., & Supronienė, S. (2018). Changes in weed seed bank and flora as affected by soil tillage systems. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 105(3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2018.105.028
Ball, D. A., & Miller, S. D. (1989). A comparison of techniques for estimation of arable soil seedbanks and their relationship to weed flora. Weed Research, 29(5), 365–373.
Botha, C. (2001). Common weeds of crops and gardens in South Africa. ARC-Grain Crops Institute, Pretoria, South Africa.
Buhler, D. D., Hartzler, R. G., & Forcella, F. (1997, June). Implications of weed seedbank dynamics to weed management. Weed Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500092948
Carpio, A. J., Lora, A., Martín‐Consuegra, E., Sánchez‐Cuesta, R., Tortosa, F. S., & Castro, J. (2020). The influence of the soil management systems on aboveground and seed bank weed communities in olive orchards. Weed Biology and Management, 20(1), 12–23.
Chauhan, B. S., Gill, G., & Preston, C. (2006). Influence of tillage systems on vertical distribution, seedling recruitment and persistence of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) seed bank. Weed Science, 54(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-184R.1
Colbach, N., Dessaint, F., & Forcella, F. (2000). Evaluating field-scale sampling methods for the estimation of mean plant densities of weeds. WEED RESEARCH-OXFORD-, 40(5), 411–430.
Cordeau, S. (2022). Conservation agriculture and agroecological weed management. In Agronomy (Vol. 12, Issue 4, p. 867). MDPI.
De Villiers, A. J., Van Rooyen, M. W., & Theron, G. K. (1994). Comparison of two methods for estimating the size of the viable seed bank of two plant communities in the Strandveld of the west coast, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany, 60(1), 81–84.
Dekker, J. (2011). Soil Weed Seed Banks and Weed Management. Journal of Crop Production. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/9785535
DeMalach, N., Kigel, J., & Sternberg, M. (2021). The soil seed bank can buffer long-term compositional changes in annual plant communities. Journal of Ecology, 109(3), 1275–1283. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13555
Feledyn-Szewczyk, B., Smagacz, J., Kwiatkowski, C. A., Harasim, E., & Woźniak, A. (2020). Weed Flora and Soil Seed Bank Composition as Affected by Tillage System in Three-Year Crop Rotation. Agriculture, 10(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10050186
Fonteyne, S., Singh, R. G., Govaerts, B., & Verhulst, N. (2020). Rotation, mulch and zero tillage reduce weeds in a long-term conservation agriculture trial. Agronomy, 10(7), 962.
Forcella, F. (1992). Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried seed reserves. Weed Research, 32(1), 29–38.
Forcella, F., Webster, T., & Cardina, J. (2003). Protocols for weed seed bank determination in agro-ecosystems. 17.
Gonzalez, S., & Ghermandi, L. (2012). Comparison of methods to estimate soil seed banks: The role of seed size and mass. Community Ecology, 13(2), 238–242.
Hossain, M., & Begum, M. (2016). Soil weed seed bank: Importance and management for sustainable crop production- A Review. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 13(2), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v13i2.28783
Hossain, M. M., Begum, M., Hashem, A., Rahman, M. M., Ahmed, S., Hassan, M. M., Javed, T., Shabbir, R., Hadifa, A., & Sabagh, A. E. (2021). Strip tillage and crop residue retention decrease the size but increase the diversity of the weed seed bank under intensive rice-based crop rotations in Bangladesh. Agronomy, 11(6), 1164.
Kumakech, A., Acipa, A., Doi, F., & Maiteki, G. A. (2014). Efficacy of rehabilitation methods on citrus canker disease in northern Uganda. African Crop Science Journal, 22(2), 117-121.
Kumari, S. (2018). Dynamics of weed seed bank and its management for sustainable crop production. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327142054_Dynamics_of_weed_seed_bank_and_its_management_for_sustainable_crop_production
MacLaren, C., Storkey, J., Menegat, A., Metcalfe, H., & Dehnen-Schmutz, K. (2020). An ecological future for weed science to sustain crop production and the environment. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40(4), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00631-6
Mani, D., Singh, M. K., & Prasad, S. K. (2016). Varieties and mulching influence on weed growth in wheat under Indo-Gangetic plain of India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8(2), 515–520.
Menalled, F., & Schonbeck, M. (2011). Manage the weed seed bank—Minimize ‘“deposits” and maximize ‘“withdrawals.”’ Margins, 1, 8.
Mesgaran, M. B., Mashhadi, H. R., Zand, E., & Alizadeh, H. M. (2007a). Comparison of three methodologies for efficient seed extraction in studies of soil weed seedbanks. Weed Research, 47(6), 472– 478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00592.x
Mesgaran, M. B., Mashhadi, H. R., Zand, E., & Alizadeh, H. M. (2007b). Comparison of three methodologies for efficient seed extraction in studies of soil weed seedbanks. Weed Research, 47(6), 472–478.
Mukhongo, J. N., Kinyamario, J. I., Chira, R. M., & Musila, W. (2011). Assessment of soil seed bank from six different vegetation types in Kakamega forest, Western Kenya. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(65), 14384–14391.
Netto, A. G., Christoffoleti, P., VanGessel, M., Carvalho, S. J., Nicolai, M., & Brunharo, C. (2022). Seed Production, Dissemination, and Weed Seedbanks. Persistence Strategies of Weeds, 19–42.
Padonou, E. A., Akakpo, B. A., Tchigossou, B., & Djossa, B. (2022a). Methods of soil seed bank estimation: A literature review proposing further work in Africa. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 15(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3850-015
Padonou, E. A., Akakpo, B. A., Tchigossou, B., & Djossa, B. (2022b). Methods of soil seed bank estimation: A literature review proposing further work in Africa. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 15(2), 121.
Price, J. N., Wright, B. R., Gross, C. L., & Whalley, W. R. D. B. (2010). Comparison of seedling emergence and seed extraction techniques for estimating the composition of soil seed banks: Comparison of soil seed bank methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(2),151–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00011.x
Ranjit, J. D., Suwanketnikom, R., Chinawong, S., Suprakarn, S., Sooksathan, I., & Juntakool, S. (2007). Weed seed bank response to soil depth, tillage and weed management in the mid hill ecology. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 41(1), 17–33.
Sharma, G., Shrestha, S., Kunwar, S., & Tseng, T.-M. (2021). Crop diversification for improved weed management: A review. Agriculture, 11(5), 461.
Tataridas, A., Kanatas, P., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Zannopoulos, S., & Travlos, I. (2022). Sustainable Crop and Weed Management in the Era of the EU Green Deal: A Survival Guide. Agronomy, 12(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030589
Teixeira, F., & Basch, G. (2022). Minimum tillage and no-tillage effects on VSA indicators at different pedoclimatic zones in Europe and China.
Ter Heerdt, G. N. J., Verweij, G. L., Bekker, R. M., & Bakker, J. P. (1996). An improved method for seed-bank analysis: Seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving. Functional Ecology, 10(1), 144–151.
Thompson, K., Band, S. R., & Hodgson, J. G. (1993). Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil. Functional Ecology, 236–241.
Traba, J., Azcárate, F. M., & Peco, B. (2004). From what depth do seeds emerge? A soil seed bank experiment with Mediterranean grassland species. Seed Science Research, 14(3), 297– 303. https://doi.org/10.1079/SSR2004179
Travlos, I. S., Cheimona, N., Roussis, I., & Bilalis, D. J. (2018). Weed-Species Abundance and Diversity Indices in Relation to Tillage Systems and Fertilization. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00011
Ulber, L., Steinmann, H.-H., Klimek, S., & Isselstein, J. (2009). An on‐farm approach to investigate the impact of diversified crop rotations on weed species richness and composition in winter wheat. Weed Research, 49(5), 534–543.
Uwah, D. F., & Iwo, G. A. (2011). Effectiveness of organic mulch on the productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) and weed growth. J. Anim. Plant Sci, 21(3), 525–530.
Yang, X., Baskin, C. C., Baskin, J. M., Pakeman, R. J., Huang, Z., Gao, R., & Cornelissen, J. H. C. (2021). Global patterns of potential future plant diversity hidden in soil seed banks. Nature Communications, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27379-1
Copyright (c) 2024 Otim Godfrey Anyoni, David Ocan, Alfred Kumakech, Susan Tumwebaze, Alfred Obia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
