Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Edible Dung Beetle Larvae (Scarabaeus satyrus) Flours and Oils and their Significance in Human Nutrition

  • Fedha Monicah Salano Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology
  • Andika Darius Otiato, PhD Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology
  • Kinyuru John Ndung’u, PhD Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
Keywords: Scarabaeus Satyrus, Physicochemical, Functional, Nutrition
Share Article:

Abstract

The potential of edible insects in alleviating the nutritional challenges facing humans has led to an increased interest in their utilization.  Edible insects contain substantial amounts of protein and fats, which are very important macronutrients that confer useful functional and physicochemical properties to foods.  However, the functional properties of these nutrients have not been given sufficient attention, limiting their use as ingredients in diets and food products.  Processing of insects converts them into an ingredient that can be added to various foods, improving their acceptability in terms of flavor, taste, and nutritional content.  Popular processing methods for edible insects include frying, boiling, oven drying, roasting, smoking, and toasting.  These thermal treatments reduce the insect water content, enabling them to be milled into powders.  This study set out to investigate the fatty acid profile, protein digestibility, and physicochemical and functional properties of powders and oils of edible dung beetle (Scarabaeus satyrus).  The dung larvae were collected from three counties in Western Kenya.  They were cleaned and subjected to drying and milling, then analyzed.  Results indicated that protein digestibility ranged between 64.27-70.03%.  The dominant unsaturated fatty acid was Oleic (45.71±2.45%), while the main saturated fatty acid was Lauric (45.43 ±0.8%).  The saponification value of the oils ranged between 127.94 -130.17 mgKOH/g oil, Acid value (41.96-44.11 mg KOH/g oil), peroxide value (4.23-3.8 Meq.thio / kg sample), refractive index (1.41-1.44/25ºC) and Iodine value (77.89-88.02 g I/100g).  Functional properties of the powders showed high lipophilic (332.45±19.73%) and moderate (1.11±0.14 ml/g) hygroscopic tendencies in toasted samples from Bungoma and Siaya Counties, respectively.  Emulsifying capacity varied between 80.85%-82.53%, while emulsifying stability ranged from 80.85%-81.33%.  These findings show that the edible Scarabaeus satyrus can provide unsaturated fatty acids and can be a good ingredient in foods as an alternative to conventional cuisines

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AACC. (2000). AACC method 56-30 water hydration capacity of protein materials AACC method 56-30 water hydration capacity of protein materials (continued) 3–4

AOAC. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, edited by K. Helrach, 15th edn., AOAC, Arlington, , Sec. 965. 33.

AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists, . Washington D.C.

Bera, I., O'Sullivan, M., Flynn, D., & Shields, D. C. (2023). Relationship between Protein Digestibility and the Proteolysis of Legume Proteins during Seed Germination. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 28(7), 3204. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073204

Bukkens, S. G. F., & Ardeatina, V. (1997). The nutritional value of edible insects. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 36(November 2012), 287–319.

Chalamaiah, M., Dinesh Kumar, B., Hemalatha, R., & Jyothirmayi, T. (2012). Fish protein hydrolysates: Proximate composition, amino acid composition, antioxidant activities and applications: A review. Food Chemistry, 135(4), 3020– 3038.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.100

Falade O. S, Abolanle S Adekunle, M. A. A., & Segun O Atanda, C. H. and S. R. A. (2008). Physicochemical properties, total phenol and tocopherol of some Acacia seed oils. Journal of the Science OfFood and Agriculture, 88, 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa

Gotoh, N., & Wada, S. (2006). The importance of peroxide value in assessing food quality and food safety. Journal OfAmerican Oil Chemistry Society, 83, 473–474.

Garcés-Rimón, M., Sandoval, M., Molina, E., López-Fandiño, R., & Miguel, M. (2016). Egg protein hydrolysates: New culinary textures. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 3, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2015.04.001

Hartmann, C., Shi, J., Giusto, A., & Siegrist, M. (2015). The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China. Food Quality and Preference, 44, 148– 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.013

Jayanegara, A., Gustanti, R., Ridwan, R., & Widyastuti, Y. (2020). Fatty acid profiles of some insect oils and their effects on in vitro bovine rumen fermentation and methanogenesis. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 19(1), 1310-1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1841571

Kabirullah, M., & Wills, R. B. H. (1982). Functional properties of acetylated and succinylated sunflower protein isolate. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 17(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb00179.x

Lin, M. J. Y., & Humbert, E. S. (1974). Certain Functional Properties of Sunflower Meal Products. Journal of Food Science, 39, 5–7.

Mertz E. T., Hassen M. M., Cairns-Whittern Carleen, W. K. Allen, Lichuan Tut, & J. D. Axtell (1984). Pepsin digestibility of proteins in sorghum and other major cereals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 81, 1-2.

Naczk, M., Rubin, L. J., & Shahidi, F. (1986). Functional Properties and Phytate Content of Pea Protein Preparations. Journal of Food Science, 51(5), 1245–1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb13096.x

Ortega-Nieblas, M., Molina-Freaner, F., Robles-Burguenño, M. D. R., & Vázquez-Moreno, L. (2001). Proximate composition, protein quality and oil composition in seeds of columnar cacti from the Sonoran desert. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 14(6), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.2001.1026

Pandey, S., & Poonia, A. (2018). Insects - An Innovative Source of Food. The Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, 55(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.21048/ijnd.2018.55.1.16535

Pearson, D. (1976). The Chemical Analysis of Foods, 7th ed. Churchill Livingstone, London. Retrieved from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19791492291

Purschke, B., Meinlschmidt, P., Horn, C., Rieder, O., & Jäger, H. (2018). Improvement of techno-functional properties of edible insect protein from migratory locust by enzymatic hydrolysis. European Food Research and Technology, 244(6), 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-017-3017-9

Rumpold, B. A., & Schlüter, O. K. (2013c). Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 17, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2012.11.005

Simopoulos, A. P. (2000). Human requirement for N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Poultry Science, 79(7), 961–970. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.7.961

Ssepuuya, G., Mukisa, I. M., & Nakimbugwe, D. (2017). Nutritional composition, quality, and shelf stability of processed Ruspolia nitidula (edible grasshoppers). Food Science and Nutrition, 5(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.369

Van Huis, A. (2015). Insects As Food In Sub- Saharan Africa. Insect Sience and ItsApplication, 23(3), 163–185

Published
29 February, 2024
How to Cite
Salano, F., Otiato, A., & Ndung’u, K. (2024). Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Edible Dung Beetle Larvae (Scarabaeus satyrus) Flours and Oils and their Significance in Human Nutrition. East African Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology, 7(1), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajab.7.1.1788