Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) Interventions and the Attainment of Peace in the East African Region: A Case Study of IGAD in the South Sudan Peace Efforts

Buyinza Levi

doi:10.37284/ijgg.4.1.3455

Buyinza Levi Cavendish University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/ijgg.4.1.3455

Keywords: IGAD, Peacebuilding, South Sudan Conflict, Regional Mediation, Africa

Share Article:

Abstract

The study examines the overall effectiveness of the IGAD as a peacemaker in the conflict in the Republic of South Sudan from its independence in 2011 to 2023. This was done through examining the effectiveness, institutional framework, strategies, and challenges of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) in resolving the South Sudan conflict. Grounded on the realist and liberal institutionalist theories of international relations, which provide competing yet complementary lenses for analysing IGAD's interventions in South Sudan, the study employed a mixed methods approach with a strong emphasis on descriptive quantitative analysis and qualitative interviews. Data was collected from key stakeholders to assess IGAD’s peacebuilding interventions, the implementation of the 2015 Peace Agreement, and the institutional structures supporting these efforts. Findings reveal that IGAD’s role in peace mediation, stakeholder engagement, power-sharing proposals, and humanitarian assistance has been partially effective. However, significant limitations persist, including the absence of peacekeeping operations, weak enforcement mechanisms, technical loopholes in peace agreements, and persistent internal and external political interferences. The study also highlights gaps in sensitising warring parties on the implications of war, disarmament efforts, and equitable stakeholder inclusion. Institutional weaknesses, such as a lack of standardised monitoring systems and limited capacity to address competing member state interests, further constrain IGAD’s effectiveness. Based on these findings, the study recommends expanding IGAD’s mandate to include peacekeeping and disarmament operations, institutionalising monitoring and enforcement bodies, promoting neutral and inclusive dialogue processes, and strengthening internal accountability frameworks. Future research should explore comparative regional peacebuilding models, the role of grassroots actors in IGAD interventions, and the long-term sustainability of regional peace agreements to deepen understanding and guide reforms in regional conflict resolution mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya, A. (2021). Constructing global order (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Adebajo, A. (2018). The eagle and the springbok: Essays on Nigeria and South Africa. Jacana Media.

Aeby, M. (2022). How African Organisations Support Peace Agreement Implementation. Global Transitions Series, PeaceRep: Edinburgh, 37-50.

Agwanda, B., Asal, U. Y., Nabi, A. S. G., & Nyadera, I. N. (2021). The Role of IGAD in Peacebuilding and Conflict Resolution: The case of South Sudan. In Routledge Handbook of Conflict Response and Leadership in Africa (pp. 118-128). Routledge.

Ajang, A. J. (2016). IGAD in intra-state conflict in Upper Nile, South Sudan.

Allison, G. (2022). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides's trap? (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Aning, K. (2021). African security governance in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.

Asare-Nuamah, P. (2017). Understanding African Integration from African theoretical perspective. Ethiopian e-Journal for Research and Innovation Foresight (Ee-JRIF), 9(2).

Autesserre, S. (2021). The frontlines of peace: An insider's guide to changing the world. Oxford University Press.

Baker, C. (2011). Sudan since the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement. University of Denver Press.

Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2020). Qualitative research in conflict zones. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 3-7.

Bereketeab, R. (2022). Regional organizations in Africa: Problems and prospects. Palgrave Macmillan.

Brosig, M. (2020). The African security regime complex. African Security, 13(1), 1-23.

Brosig, M. (2022). The interregnum of regional organizations in Africa. International Affairs, 98(3), 839-856.

Cohen, N., Arieli, T., & AbedElal, N. (2018). Sampling in conflict environments. Field Methods, 30(3), 175-191.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Sage.

Day, A., & Hunt, C. (2020). UN transitions: Managing peace process closures. International Peace Institute.

de Coning, C. (2018). Adaptive peacebuilding. International Affairs, 94(2), 301-317.

de Vries, L. (2022). The political marketplace and post-war state formation in South Sudan. Journal of Modern African Studies, 60(1), 25-47

de Vries, L., & Justin, P. H. (2019). The political economy of South Sudan's civil war. African Affairs, 118(471), 194-216.

de Waal, A. (2022). New Pandemonium: The Horn of Africa's perpetual conflict complex. World Peace Foundation.

Dor, M. A. (2017). Conflict Resolution as a Learning Process: The Sudanese People's Liberation Movement/Army 1983-2005 (Doctoral dissertation, King's College London).

Elmukashfi, I. (2020). The Role of Colonial Powers in African Conflicts: A Case Study of Britain in Sudan Conflict and the Secession of South Sudan (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Galbreath, D. J. (2021). The OSCE and contemporary European security. European Security, 30(1), 1-20.

International Crisis Group (ICG). (2023). South Sudan's stalling peace process (Africa Report No. 312). https://www.crisisgroup.org

International Crisis Group. (2022). South Sudan's stalling peace process. Africa Report No. 312.

International Crisis Group (ICG). (2021). South Sudan's troubled peace process (Africa Report No. 301). https://www.crisisgroup.org

Irit, B. (2014). Uganda and Sudan’s partisan roles in South Sudan’s conflict (Policy Brief No. 2014/01). Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/

Jacobsen, K., & Landau, L. (2021). Ethical research in refugee studies. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 40(1), 1-15.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2020). Power and interdependence (5th ed.). Longman.

Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.

Legrenzi, M. (2021). The GCC and the international relations of the Gulf. I.B. Tauris.

Leonhardt, M. (2021). Local ownership in peacebuilding. Routledge.

Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. (2021). The local turn in peace building. Routledge.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2018). The great delusion: Liberal dreams and international realities. Yale University Press.

Mertens, D. M. (2020). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (5th ed.). Sage.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Knopf.

Mukhopadhyay, D. (2022). Afghanistan's peace process collapse. USIP Press.

Mwai, C., & Wasara, S. (2021). Proxy wars and regional mediation in South Sudan. African Security Review, 30(3), 278-295.

Nathan, L. (2019). Community of insecurity: SADC's struggle for peace and security in Southern Africa. Routledge.

Njagi, S. M. (2018). The Role of Politicized Ethnicity on Conflict in Africa: a Case Study of Kenya, 1992-2016 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Nowell, L., Norris, J., White, D., & Moules, N. (2017). Thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13.

Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). (2023). South Sudan humanitarian needs overview. UNOCHA. https://reliefweb.int

Omeje, K. (2017). Extractive economies and conflicts in the global south: re-engaging rentier theory and politics. In Extractive Economies and Conflicts in the Global South (pp. 19-44). Routledge.

Paffenholz, T. (2020). International peacebuilding goes local: Analysing Lederach's conflict transformation theory. Palgrave Macmillan.

Pherali, T., & Lewis, A. (2019). Developing research instruments for conflict settings. Comparative Education, 55(4), 515-535.

Pinaud, C. (2021). South Sudan's civil war: Violence, insurgency and failed peacemaking. Zed Books.

Pouligny, B. (2021). Peace operations seen from below. Hurst Publishers.

Reconstituted Joint Monitoring and Evaluation Commission (RJMEC). (2022). Status of the revitalized agreement on the resolution of the conflict in South Sudan: 2022 report.

Reconstituted Joint Monitoring and Evaluation Commission. (2022). Evaluation of R-ARCSS implementation.

Souleymane, B. (2022). The UN-AU partnership in Mali. African Security Review, 31(1), 45-62.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2018). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.

Thomas, E. (2020). South Sudan: A slow liberation. Zed Books.

Tieku, T. K. (2022). Institutional weaknesses in African regional organizations. Global Governance, 28(1), 45-63.

United Nations Security Council (UNSC). (2022). Final report of the Panel of Experts on South Sudan (S/2022/1002). https://undocs.org/S/2022/1002

United Nations Department of Peace Operations. (2022). Peace operation financing report. UN DPO.

United Nations Women. (2022). Women's participation in South Sudan's peace process. UN Women.Wasara, S. (2021). Proxy warfare in the Sudans: 2013-2021. Horn of Africa Security Journal, 14(2), 45-67.

Zambakari, C., Johnson, D. H., Nyaba, P. A., Gamboriko, R. E. V., Wuol, J. M., Ukeil, N. M., ... & Malish, J. P. (2019). Peacemaking and Peace Agreements in South Sudan.