Rethinking the Influence of Agenda Setting Theory: An Assessment of the Influence of Agenda Setting Theory in the Voting Decisions during the 2020 General Election in Tanzania
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the agenda setting theory’s ability to affect and impact voters voting decisions during the 2020 Presidential election in Tanzania. The research specifically aimed to ascertain the agenda setting theory’s dominance on the voting decisions in comparison to other dominant third party factors such as prior knowledge, political affiliations and emotions amongst prospective voters. The research used FGD to collect the qualitative data while a survey procedure was used to gather the quantitative data. A total of five FGD were conducted which comprised of between six to nine informants whereas 478 questionnaires were successful returned and used in the analysis. A purposive sampling procedure was used to identify and select participants for the FGD whereas a simple random sampling technique was used for the survey. The participants for both FGD and survey were gotten from the Voter’s Registration Books (VRB) from each wards. The data collection was conducted between December 2020 and January 2021 in the five wards of Nyamagana district in Mwanza, Tanzania. After data collection, the data were coded and cleaned using the Scientific Package for Social Solutions (SPSS) version 20 before analysis. The frequency count, tables, descriptions, explanations, and simple percentage were used to present the research findings. The findings show that Agenda Setting Theory has slightly lost its power, it has been superseded by pre-existing knowledge (52%) and political party affiliations (27%).
Downloads
References
Abelson et al, (1982). Effective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception. J.Pers.Soc.Psychol.Bartels, L. (2000). Partsanship and voting behaviour. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 35-50.
Chiu, K. (2002). An exploratory study on the relationship among electorates voting behaviour, party identification, personal values, and demographic characteristics. PhD thesis submitted to the College of Administration and Business, Louisiana Technical University.
Christopher, W. (2013). Emotion, Campaign, and Political Participation. Political Research Quarte, 66(2), 414-428.
Dand,T, et al. (2016). Agenda-Setting, Priming, & Framing. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy.
David, H. W. & Yue, T. (2013)."Agenda Divesity and Agenda Setting from 1956 t0 2004: What are the Trends over Time? Journalism Studies 14(6):773-89.
Denis,W. & Renita,C. (2009). Advancing Agenda-Setting Theory: The Comparative Strength and New Contingent Condition of the two Levels of Agenda-Setting Effects.Vol.86, Issue 4. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly.
Dimitrova, D. V. (2005). Framing of the Iraq War in the online New York Times. San Antonio. A Paper presented to the Newspaper Division, AEJMC.
Gennadity,V., Sebastian, V. & McCombs,M. (2011). The Agenda-Setting Role of he News Media: An Intergrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research. NY: Routledge.
Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the Tapestry: The Second Level lof Agenda Setting in Communication and Democray: Exproring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dittmore,S. & Sltzer,T. (2009). Down,Set, Second-Level Agenda Building and the NFL Network Carriage Dispute. International Journal of Sport Communication.
Du, Y. (2008). Mass media agenda setting function in the age of globalization: a multination agenda setting test. North Carolina: PhD thesis submitted to the graduate school, university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Freeland, A. (2012). An Overview of Agenda Setting Theory in Mass Communications. Denton, TX: University of North Texas.
Gennadity, C. S. (2011). An experimental Comparison of two perspectives on the concept of need for orientation in Agenda Setting Theory. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 142-155.
Juliusson, E. A. et al. (2005). Weiging the Past and the Future in Decision Making. Europen Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
Lau, R. R. & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How Voters decide, Information Processing during Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee,K.L. et al.. (2000). Agenda -Seting and the Internet: Thhe Intermedia Infulence of Internet Bulletin Boards on Newspaper Coverage of the 2000 General Election in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication.Vol.2 (4).
Lee, C. (2004). Public Relations campaigns in 2002 Korean presidential election: Functional Analysis of political discource and media effects of Agenda Setting and Favourability. Missouri. PhD thesis submitted to the Faculty Graduate School of the University of Missouri.
Marcus, G.E. (2007). The psychology of emotions and politics. Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 82 (3), 182-221.
Marcus, G. E. et al. (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgement. Chicago,IL: University of Chicago Press.
Marcus, G. E. (1998).The Structure of Emotional Response:1984 Presidential Candidates. American Political Science Review, 82 (3),737-761.
Marcus, G. E. (1993). Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaign. Journal of Political Science and Pschology. Vol. 62. (4).166-178.
McCombs, M. & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
McComb, M. (1993). The Evolution of Agenda Setting Research: Twenty Five Years in the Market Place of Ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(1), 58-67.
McCombs, M. (2005). A Look at Agenda Setting: Past, Present and Future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557.
McCombs, M. (2003). Agenda Setting Effects of Business News on the public’s Image and Opinions about major Corporations. 6(1), 36-46.
McCombs,M. & Shaw,D. (1995). Evolution of Agenda Setting Research: Twenty-five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas. Journal of Communication.VOL.43,Issue.2, P.58-67.
Muin, M. (2011). Agenda setting theory and the role of media in shaping public opinion for the Iraq war. A thesis submitted to the Department of Communication, University of Central Missouri.
Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing Analysis. An approach to News Discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75.
Puglisi, R. (2007). The Political Role of Mass Media in an Agenda Setting Framework: Theory and Evidence. PhD thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of London.
Rasul, A. (2011). Media Frames Vs Individual Frames. A Study of Politico Judicial Crisis in Pakistan.
Rebecca, B. S. (2005). Framing the 2004 Presidential Election: The Role of Media, Political Decision and Opinion Leaders. PhD thesis submitted to the Graduate Study of the School of the Ohio State University.
Reese, S. D. (1990). Setting the Media’s Agenda: A power Balance Perspective. A paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division at the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Minneapolis.
Reese, S. D., Grandy, O. & Grandy, A. (2008). Framing Public Life. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Sabir,A.F. (2012). A Content Analysis of the Media Agenda Setting in the Saudi national TV Newscast. International Humanities Review. Vol.21,No.1.p.2-16.
Sagi,H. & Friedland,N. (2007). Comparing the "Media" and "Audience".ournal of Personality and Socia Psychology. 93(4).p.515-24
Wang, K. Y. & Atkin, D. (2014). Media Versus Individuals Frames and Horizontal Knowledge Gaps. Butler University, College of Communication.
Weber, C. (2008). The emotional campaign: How emotions influence political behaviour and judgement. PhD thesis submitted to the graduate school, Stony Brook University.
West, M. (2007). Feelings, Being, and the Sense of Self: A New Perspective on Identity, Affect and Narcissistic Disorders . London : Karnac Books Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2024 Cezalia Buyanza-Mwidima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
