Monetary Policy and Demand for Real Cash Balances: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results

  • Peter Ng’ang’a, PhD Kenyatta University
Keywords: Monetary Policy, Money Supply, Real Cash-Balance, Money Demand, Interest-elasticity, Income-elasticity, Elasticity Coefficient of Adjustment, Autoregressive Model
Share Article:


Influence of monetary policy is ordinarily studied within Hicksian  model. This, nonetheless, tolerates only the comparison of positions of static equilibrium making  model inapt to analyse the path of an economy that is out of equilibrium. In a complex, dynamic economy experiencing incessant structural transformation with technical and institutional rigidities, inertia and contractual obligations, autoregressive model of adjustment mechanism must apply. This paper revealed that it might be disingenuous and cynical to view the real world using Hicksian static formulation particularly in the short run. The objective of this paper was to examine impact of monetary policy on demand for real cash balances by establishing how dynamic considerations could enter monetary economics. This paper ingeniously introduced adjustment-lagged variable in the conventional money demand function and estimated elasticity coefficient of adjustment. Regression analysis on the monetary data from 2000-2022 was conducted. The study found that money demand in Kenya responds diminutively to changes in interest rate. Estimated elasticity coefficients of adjustment revealed that in aggregate, Kenyans adjust their portfolio within a year. If central bank changes money stock, this study established that the smaller the value of interest elasticity coefficient, the greater the necessary change in rate of interest needed to accommodate such a policy. These elegant results set limits to the extent in which the volume of money in circulation could be raised in an exogenous manner at the behest of monetary policy committee. The study concluded that the less the demand for real balances vary with interest rates, the greater will be the efficacy of monetary policy. Thus, effectiveness of monetary policy is directly correlated with low interest elasticity of money demand. Violent rise in interest rate might precipitate a failure of the banking system


Download data is not yet available.


Baron, M., Emily, V., & Xiong, W. (2021). Banking Crises Without Panics, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(1), 51-113.

Baumol, W. (1952). The Transaction Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach, Quarterly Journal of Economics (Q.J.E.), LXVI, 545-56.

Bronfenbrenner, M & Mayer T. (1960). Liquidity Functions in the American Economy, Economtrica, 28, 810-834.

Brunner, K & Meltzer, A. (1963). Predicting Velocity: Implications for Theory and Policy, Journal of Finance, 18 319-354.

Carlson, M., Correia, S., Luck, S. (2022). The effects of Banking Competition on Growth and Financial Stability: Evidence from the National Banking Era, Journal of Political Economy, 130(2), 462-520

Choi, M., & Liang, F. (2023). Learning and Money Adoption, Journal of Political Economy, 131(7), 1772-1796

Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Weber, M. (2022). Monetary Policy Communication and their Effects on Household Inflation Expectations, Journal of Political Economy, 130(6), 1537-1584

Cooper, D. & Peek, J. (2021). The Effects of Changes in Local Bank Health on Household Consumption, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(4), 711-724.

Feige, E. (1964). The Demand for Liquid Assets: A Temporal Cross Section Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

______. (1967). Expectations and Adjustments in the Monetary Sector, American Economic Review, 57 (papers and proceedings), 462-73.

Friedman, M. (1959). The Quantity Theory of Money, a Restatement, in Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, ed. Friedman, M., Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.

Geromichalos, A., Herrenbrueck, L., Lee, S. (2023). Asset Safety Versus Liquidity, Journal of Political Economy, 131(5), 1172-1212.

Gurley, J. & Shaw, E. (1960). Money in a Theory of Finance. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.

Hamburger, M. (1968). Household Demand for Financial Assets, Econometrica, 36. 97-118.

Hicks, J. (1937). “Mr. Keynes and the Classics: A Suggested Reinterpretation, Econometrica, 5:147 – 159.

Keynes, J. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London: Macmillan, p. 197.

Laidler, D. (1966). Some Evidence on the Demand for Money, Journal of Political Economy, 74, 55-68.

Laidler, D. (1966). The Rate of Interest and the Demand for Money: Some Empirical Evidence, Journal of Political Economy, 74, 545-55.

Leijonhufunds, A. (1987). IS-LM Analysis, in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Meltzer, A. (1963). The Demand for Money: The Evidence from the Time Series, Journal of Political Economy, LXXI, 219-46.

Motley, B. (1967). A Demand-for-Money Function for the Household Sector: Some Preliminary Findings, Journal of Finance, 22, 405-418.

Ng’ang’a, P. (2022). Monetary Aggregation and Speculative Real Money-Demand Equation: Theories, Evidence and Policy. Tanzanian Economic Review, 12(1), 79-95.

Pesek, B. & Saving, T. (1967). Money, Wealth, and Economic Theory, New York, Macmillan.

Teigen, R. (1964). Demand and Supply Functions for Money in the United States, Econometrica, 32(4), 477-509.

Tobin, J. (1958). “Liquidity Preference as Behaviour toward Risk”, Review of Economics and Statistics, XXV, 65-86.

Tobin, J. (1956). The Interest Elasticity of the Transactions Demand for Cash, Review of Economics and Statistics, 38, 241-247.

World Bank. (2022). World development indicators (CD-ROM).

15 September, 2023
How to Cite
Ng’ang’a, P. (2023). Monetary Policy and Demand for Real Cash Balances: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results. International Journal of Advanced Research, 6(1), 114-127.