The Compellability for Attendance of a Child through the Instrumentality of Subpoena in Civil Trials

  • Iniye Linda Iyaye Ikimi Nigerian Law School
  • Yakubu Moses Ede Nigerian Law School
  • Sylvia Ngozichukwu Ihedoro Nigerian Law School
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##: https://doi.org/10.37284/eajle.8.1.3297
##share.article##:

Résumé

A trial is one of the mechanisms set in place for the settlement of disputes and the attainment of justice in society. Trials are conducted on the strength of the evidence of the witnesses adduced through their testimonies. Witnesses can attend the trial voluntarily or under compulsion. This work ventures into the compulsory attendance of child witnesses at trial through the mechanism of subpoena. This work briefly considered the types of subpoena known as subpoena ad testificandum, subpoena duces tecum, and subpoena ad testificandum et duces tecum. The problem with this research is that the requirement of a sufficient intelligence test as required by law has been held that it must not be reduced to the record of the court. This makes it difficult to ascertain whether the stipulation of the law has been complied with or not. It is the aim of this paper to proffer pragmatic suggestions for better administration of justice. This work finds that there is a lack of uniformity in age and a lack of recording sufficient intelligence test questions by the court. Doctrinal methodology was adopted in this research work. It is recommended herein on what constitutes the age of a child and the need for uniformity of age; that sufficient intelligent test questions should be recorded and form part of the record of proceedings

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Références

Umar v State (2024) LPELR-62409 (SC) (Pp. 13-14 paras. G).

Business Edge Consulting Ltd v Bauchi State Government & Ors (2019) LPELR-50339 (CA) (Pp. 21-22 paras. D).

Ogunpolu & anor v Odugbefun (2015) LPELR-41710 (CA) (Pp. 4-5 para. D).

Gambari & anor v Saraki & ors (2009) LPELR-4182 (CA) (Pp. 14 – 16, para. B).

Evidence Act 2011, s 175(1).

Ibid.

Evidence Act 2011, s 175(2).

Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989, Article 1.

African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child 1990, Article 2.

Constitution of Angola 2010, Article 24.

Act on the Definition and Prosecution of Trafficking in Children 2003, Article 1.

African Child Policy Forum (ACPF), Second Periodic Report on the Convention on the Rights of the Child: Cameroon 2008, <http://www.africanchildforum.org (December 2013)> accessed 9 February, 2025.

Civil Code 1997, Article 133.

Constitution of Egypt 2014, Article 80.

Children’s Act 1998, s 1.

The Children Act 2001, Article 2.

Children’s Protection and Welfare Act 2011, s 2(a).

Constitution of Malawi 1994, Article 23(5); Child Care Protection and Justice Act of Malawi 2010, s 2; Children’s Protection Act of Libya 1997, Article 1.

Majority Act of Cote d’Ivoire 1970, Article 1; Code on Persons and the Family of Burundi 1993, Article 1. Child Law Resources, Definition of the Child <https://clr.africanchildforum.org/Harmonisation%20of%20Africa/other-documents-harmonisation_i_en.pdf> accessed 9 February 2025.

Children and Young Persons Act 1945, s 2.

Ibid.

Child’s Rights Act 2003, s 277.

Evidence Act 2011, s 209(1).

Evidence Act 2011, s 209(2). Section 175 deals with competence of a witness to testify in court except the court considers that the witness is prevented from understanding the questions or giving rational answers due to tender years, extreme old age or infirmity of the mind or body. And section 208 deals with cases in which evidence not given on oath is received by the court.

Evidence Act 2011, s 209(4).

T. Akinola Aguda, The Law of Evidence (Spectrum Books Limited, 4th edn., 1999, Ibadan) 339.

Ibid.

Ibid.

Ibid.

Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, s 53(1) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/23/section/53> accessed 26 May, 2025.

Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, s 53(3) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/23/section/53> accessed 26 May, 2025.

Robert B. George, DiOrioSereniLLP, ‘Out of the Mouths of Babes: Can Children be Forced to Testify in Court?’ <https://dioriosereni.com/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes-can-children-be-forced-to-testify-in-court/> accessed 22 May, 2025.

Benson Ayodele Oloworaran, Uchechukwu Esther Oloworaran and Emmanuel Olufemi Olowononi, A Guide to the Law and Practice of Evidence in Civil and Criminal Litigation in Nigeria (Institute of Human Capacity Development and Continuing Education, 2019, Port Harcourt) 511.

Ibid.

(2021) LPELR-56754(CA) (Pp. 55-57 paras. D-D).

(2021) LPELR-55097(CA) (Pp. 28-29 paras. G-C).

AIR 2008 SC 1460.

S v Sibanda 1994 (1) ZLR 394.

(HH 52 of 2002) [2002] ZWHHC 52 (8 April 2002).

S v Madzomba 1999 (2) ZLR 214; S v Mushore (CA 245 of 2006) [2011] ZWHHC 188 (7 September 2011).

S. Monyai (A 716/2015) [2018] ZAGPPHC 405 (17 May 2018).

Daniella Rousseau, ‘Testimony from a Child’, <https://sites.bu.edu/daniellarousseau/2022/08/11/testimony-from-a-child/> accessed 22 May 2025; Robert B. George, DiOrioSereniLLP, ‘Out of the Mouths of Babes: Can Children be Forced to Testify in Court?’ <https://dioriosereni.com/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes-can-children-be-forced-to-testify-in-court/> accessed 22 May, 2025.

Fidelis Nwadialo, Civil Litigation in Nigeria (University of Lagos Press, 2nd edn., 2000, Lagos) 123.

Ibid.

D. I. Efevwerhan, Principles of Civil Procedure in Nigeria (Chenglo Ltd, 3rd edn (Revised), 2020, Enugu) 181.

Children and Young Persons Act 1945, s 2.

Ibid.

Child’s Rights Act 2003, s 277 defines a street child to include a child who is homeless and forced to live on the streets, in market places and under bridges; and a child who, though not homeless is on the streets engaged in begging for alms, child labour, prostitution, and other criminal activities which are detrimental to the well-being of the child.

Sebastine Tar. Hon, S.T. Hon’s Law of Evidence (Volume I, Pearl Publishers, 2012, Port Harcourt) 6.

Child’s Right Act 2003.

Child’s Rights Act 2003, s 220(1)(b).

Child’s Rights Act 2003, ss 220(1) and 223(1)(e)(i).

Child’s Rights Act 2003, s 218 (1).

Child’s Rights Act 2003, s 236(1).

Child’s Rights Act 2003, s 221(1)(a).

Child’s Rights Act 2003, s 220(1)(a).

Child’s Rights Act 2003, s 223(1)(a) and (b).

Afe Babalola, Law and Practice of Evidence in Nigeria (Sibon Books Ltd, 2001, Ibadan) 400.

<https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk> accessed May 5, 2025.

T. Akinola Aguda, The Law of Evidence (Spectrum Books Limited, 4th edn., 1999, Ibadan) 379.

Evidence Act, s 183.

Child’s Rights Act 2003, s 21.

Sebastine Tar. Hon, S.T. Hon’s Law of Evidence (Volume II, Pearl Publishers, 2012, Port Harcourt) 1255

Ibid.

Ibid.

Peter Murphy, Murphy on Evidence (Oxford University Press, 11th edn., 2009, New York) 549.

Peter Murphy, Murphy on Evidence (Oxford University Press, 11th edn., 2009, New York) 551.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 2024 <https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp > accessed 29 April 2025

Ibid.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 2024 <https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp> accessed 29 April 2025

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 2024 <https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp> accessed 29 April 2025

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 2024 <https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp> accessed 29 April 2025

Title 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Texas <https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.24.htm> accessed 29 April 2025.

Publiée
9 juillet, 2025