Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention: A legal challenge of Art. 4(H) of the African Union Constitutive Act

Ayuel Monyluak Aluou

doi:10.37284/eajle.7.1.2045

Ayuel Monyluak Aluou Kenyatta University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/eajle.7.1.2045

Keywords: Military intervention, Responsibility to Protect (R2P), Humanitarian Grounds, Sovereignty, African Union Constitutive Act

Share Article:

Abstract

The emergence of the new norm of military intervention based on humanitarian grounds, also dubbed as ‘Responsibility to Protect (R2P)’, after the end of the Cold War, has been described as ‘highly controversial’ and that its application could connote humanitarianism or imperialism (Zimmermann, 2014). In that, its application would eclipse the principle of sovereignty, considered the very foundation of the international system. This article is an attempt to assess the legality of Art. 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act of 2002, particularly, its incompatibility with the principle of sovereignty. This legal challenge can only be understood by giving a brief sketch of both sovereignty and the legitimacy of the transnational norm of military intervention that has been institutionalized by the African Union Constitutive Act

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amvane, G. (2015). Intervention Pursuant to article 4(h) of the Constitutive Act of the African Union without United Nations Security Council. https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2015/v152a3

Annan, K. (1999). Secretary-General Annual Report to General Assembly, 20 September, 1999: G/SM7136/19999596.

Bellamy, A. J., & Wheeler, N. J. (2008). Humanitarian intervention in world politics. In J. Baylis, S. Smith, & P. Owens (Eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations (4th ed., pp. 522-539). Oxford University Press.

Brower, J., et al. (n.d.). Historical Examples of Unauthorized Humanitarian Intervention. Retrieved from https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/cgic/GLC_historicalExamples.pdf

Bujra, A. (2002). From the OAU to the African Union. Retrieved from https://bibliobeca.hegoa.ehu.system.pdf

Cha, K. (n.d.). Humanitarian Intervention by Regional Organizations Under the Charter of the United Nations. Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 3(2), Article 10, 134-145.

Coady, C. A. J. (2002). The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention. The United States Institute of Peace.

Deng, F. M. (1995). Frontiers of Sovereignty: A Framework of Protection, Assistance, and Development for Internally Displaced. Leiden Journal of International Law, 8(2), 249-286.

Edo, V. O., & Olanrewaju, M. A. (2012). An assessment of the Transformation of African Unity (O.A.U) to the African Union (A.U), 1963-2007. Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria, 21, 41-69.

Engel, U. (2023). Pan-Africanism remains a dream: four key issues the African Union must tackle. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/pan.africanism-remains-a-dream-four-key-issues-the-african-union-must-tackle-19979

Evans, G. (2004). The Responsibility to Protect: Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention. American Society of International Law, 98, 78-89.

Fukuyama, F. (2006). The End of History and the Last Man. Free Press.

Gueli, R. (n.d.). Humanitarian Intervention in Africa: Towards A New Posture. Retrieved from https://journals.co.za/do/pdf/10.10520/AJA1022813637 (20040, pp. 120-142)

Gunatilleke, G. (2016). R2P and the Normative Accountability of UN Security Council. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/2016/09/r2p-and-the-normative-accountability-of-the-un-security-council/

Hernandez, G. (2019). International Law. Oxford University Press.

Holzgrefe, J. L. (2003). The humanitarian intervention debate. In J. L. Holzgrefe & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (pp. 1-15). Cambridge University Press.

Jamnejad, M., & Wood, M. (2009). The Principle of Non-intervention. Leiden Journal of International Law, 22, 345-381.

Kabau, T. (2012). The Responsibility to Protect and the Role of Regional Organizations: An Appraisal of the African Union’s intervention. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 4, 49-92.

Kindiki, K. (2007). Intervention to protect civilians in Darfur: Legal Dilemmas and Policy Imperatives. ISS Monograph Series, No. 131, May 2007.

Kuwali, D. (2009). The end of humanitarian intervention: Evaluation of the African Union’s right of intervention. ACCORD. Retrieved from https://www.accord.org.za/thematic-area/hum-rights/

Mathews, K. (2018). The African Union and the Renaissance of Pan-Africanism. In T. Karbo & T. Murithi (Eds.), The African Union: Autocracy, Diplomacy and Peacebuilding in Africa (pp. 15-35). I. B. TAURIS.

Nyhamar, T. (2000). How Norms Work? A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of African International Relations. International Journal of Peace Studies, 5(2), 27-43.

Puley, G. (2005). The Responsibility to Protect: East, West, and Southern African Perspectives on Preventing and Responding to Humanitarian Crises. Working Paper, Project Ploughshares 05-5.

Ramsbotham, O., & Woodhouse, T. (1996). Humanitarian Intervention in Contemporary Conflict. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Tanca, A. (1993). Foreign Armed Intervention in Internal Conflict. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

The New African Magazine. (2012, July 26). From OAU to AU.

Williams, P. D. (2007). From Non-intervention to non-Indifference: The Origins and Development of the African Union's Security culture. African Affairs, 106(423), 253-279.

Zimmermann, D. (2014). Why is the Practice of Humanitarian Intervention so Controversial? Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/2014/04/30/why-is-the-practice-of-humanitarian-intervention-so-controversial/