A Contextualized Farm Management Information System
Abstract
Various Information Communication Technology (ICT) Agricultural initiatives implemented in Kenya have largely concentrated on the general farming set ups, ignoring the specific farm and Agricultural activities contexts. Literature review, sampling of ICT for Agriculture initiative (ICT4Agri) reports, and our knowledge on existing Agricultural Management Information Systems (AMISs) showed that a majority of the ICT4Agri for various farm management were general in nature and mostly facilitated information push towards farmers as opposed to allowing for a bidirectional flow of information. Only a few personalized and contextualized MISs for day-to-day management of farms existed. Besides their abundance, adoption, and use, challenges still exist due to the generalized nature in which system designers and developers conceptualize the ICT4Agri artefacts. With the objective of finding out if a more contextualized Agricultural farm Management Information System was better than the generalized Agricultural systems, we carried out an analysis of the current situation and designed, implemented, and tested a new integrated ICT4Agri dairy farm Management Information System. The system was co-designed with five purposefully selected ICT literate dairy farmers from the North rift counties of Kenya. Besides the presentation of the developed artefact, this paper presents the study results which showed that there is still need for compatible ICT agricultural systems which can allow farmers to process their own data by being allowed to have bidirectional movement of data and being able to create and use their own data. As a result, it was noted that there still exists a lot of opportunities for Agricultural digitization, especially if contextualization was to be factored in
Downloads
References
Akuku, B., Haaksma, G., & Derksen H. (2019). Digital farming in Kenya, opportunities, challenges for Dutch ICT companies. [https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2019/12/Digital-Farming-in-Kenya.pdf]
Amlani, R. D. (2012). Advantages and limitations of different SDLC models. International Journal of Computer Applications & Information Technology, 1(3), 6-11.
Asiedu-Darko, E., & Bekoe, S. (2014). ICTs as Enabler in the Dissemination of Agricultural Technologies: A Study in the East Akim District, Eastern Ghana. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 3(3), 224-232
Ayim, C., Kassahun, A., Tekinerdogan, B., & Addison, C. (2020). Adoption of ICT innovations in the agriculture sector in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.13831
Barakabitze, A. A., Fue, K. G., & Sanga, C. A. (2017). The use of participatory approaches in developing ICT‐based systems for disseminating agricultural knowledge and information for farmers in developing countries: The case of Tanzania. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 78(1), 1-23.
Bansler, J. P., & Havn, E. (2010). Pilot implementation of health information systems: Issues and challenges. International journal of medical informatics, 79(9), 637-648.
Baumüller, H. (2016). Agricultural service delivery through mobile phones: local innovation and technological opportunities in Kenya. In Technological and institutional innovations for marginalized smallholders in agricultural development (pp. 143-162). Springer, Cham.
Byun, Y., Oh, S., & Choi, M. (2020). ICT agriculture support system for chili pepper harvesting. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 16(3), 629-638.
Founder360 (2018), 7 Agri-Tech Startups Disrupting Small-scale Farming in Kenya. https://founder360mag.com/7-agri-tech-startups-disruptingsmall-scale-farming-in-kenya/
Gandhi, P., Khanna, S., & Ramaswamy, S. (2016). Which industries are the most digital (and why)? Harvard business review, 1, 45-48. https://hbr.org/2016/04/a-chart-that-shows-which-industries-are-the-most-digital-and-why
Geopoll. (2020). The digital farmer: A study of Kenyas Agricultural sector https://mediae.org/documents/2/Kenya-Agricultural-Report_Mediae_Geopoll.pdf
Ngari, F. M., Obuya, G. A., Hou, X., Larson, G., & Braimoh, A. (2016). Climate information services providers in Kenya (No. 103186, pp. 1-46). The World Bank.
Graduate Farmer. (2018). 5 Useful Farming Apps in Kenya. Available at https://graduatefarmer.co.ke/2018/06/27/5-useful-farming-apps-in-kenya/
Kiambi, D. K. (2018). The use of information communication and technology in advancement of African agriculture.
Law, N., Woo, D., & Wong, G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4. 2 (No. 51, p. 146). UNESCO.
Makini, F. M., Mose, L. O., Kamau, G., Mulinge, W., Salasya, B., Akuku, B., & Makelo, M. (2020). The Status of ICT Infrastructure, Innovative Environment and ICT4AG Services in Agriculture. Food and Nutrition in Kenya, 5(11), 75.
Muriithi, A. G., Bett, E., & Ogaleh, S. A. (2009, October). Information technology for agriculture and rural development in Africa: Experiences from Kenya. In Conference on international research on food security, natural resource management and rural development (pp. 6-8)
Pignatti, E., Carli, G., & Canavari, M. (2015). What really matters? A qualitative analysis on the adoption of innovations in agriculture. Agrárinformatika/Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 6(4), 73-84.
Redmond-Pyle, D. (1996). Software development methods and tools: some trends and issues. Software Engineering Journal, 11(2), 99-103.
Thomas, M., & McGarry, F. (1994). Top-down vs. bottom-up process improvement. IEEE Software, 11(4), 12-13.
Viatte, G. (2001). Adopting technologies for sustainable farming systems: an OECD perspective. In Adoption of Technologies for Sustainable Farming Systems Wageningen Workshop Proceedings
World Bank. (2017). ICT in Agriculture (Updated Edition): Connecting Smallholders to Knowledge, Networks, and Institutions. The World Bank.
Yoon, C., Lim, D., & Park, C. (2020). Factors affecting adoption of smart farms: The case of Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106309.
Copyright (c) 2022 Christopher Kipchumba Chepken
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
