Ethical Implications of Advanced Surveillance Technologies on Law Enforcement: A Case Study of National Police Service in County of Nairobi, Kenya
Abstract
The study's research objectives included examining the effects of advanced surveillance technologies on law enforcement by NPS in Nairobi County and evaluating the ethical implications of using these technologies by the NPS. The social contract theory was used to understand the ethical implications of using advanced surveillance technologies in law enforcement. The research population includes the 4.7 residents of Nairobi County affected by the implementation of advanced surveillance technologies both overtly and covertly. The data was collected from a sample of 50 randomly sampled participants. The respondents were engaged using a qualitative questionnaire. Therefore, both qualitative and quantitative data were collected in the study. The study was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) and the thematic analysis method. The study concluded that the use of advanced surveillance technologies such as CCTV systems, facial recognition, license plate recognition, drones, forensic tools, and biometric systems in law enforcement and public safety are widely acknowledged. The ethical considerations regarding these technologies include data security, privacy, freedom of expression, transparency, and accountability. These, however, do not negate the fact that the technologies are necessary for enhancing public safety and emergency response. It is, therefore, imperative to establish clear guidelines and regulations for using advanced surveillance technologies in law enforcement
Downloads
References
Alfonsi, A., & Berliri, M. (2021). Science, Ethics, and Responsible Research – The Case of Surveillance. In R. Iphofen & D. O'Mathúna (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Covert, Security and Surveillance Research (Vol. 8, pp. 17–28). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820210000008003
Almeida, D., Shmarko, K., & Lomas, E. (2023). The ethics of facial recognition technologies, surveillance, and accountability in an age of artificial intelligence: A comparative analysis of US, EU, and UK regulatory frameworks. Ai and Ethics, 2(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00077-w
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Ezzeddine, Y., Bayerl, P. S., & Gibson, H. (2023). Safety, privacy, or both: Evaluating citizens' perspectives around artificial intelligence use by police forces. Policing and Society, 33(7), 861– 876. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2023.2211813
Fussey, P., & Sandhu, A. (2022). Surveillance arbitration in the era of digital policing. Theoretical Criminology, 26(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480620967020
Gstrein, O. J., Bunnik, A., & Zwitter, A. (2019). Ethical, Legal and Social Challenges of Predictive Policing. (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3447158). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3447158
Harper, D. J., Ellis, D., & Tucker, I. (2021). Covert Aspects of Surveillance and the Ethical Issues They Raise. In R. Iphofen & D. O'Mathúna (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Covert, Security and Surveillance Research (Vol. 8, pp. 177–197). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820210000008013
Hill, D., O'Connor, C. D., & Slane, A. (2022). Police use of facial recognition technology: The potential for engaging the public through co-constructed policy-making. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 24(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221089558
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age International Ltd.
Laufs, J., & Borrion, H. (2022). Technological innovation in policing and crime prevention: Practitioner perspectives from London. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 24(2), 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557211064053
Liaropoulos, A. (2020). A Social Contract for Cyberspace. Journal of Information Warfare, 19, 2 (2020). 29, 1–11.
Maliphol, S., & Hamilton, C. (2022). Smart Policing: Ethical Issues & Technology Management of Robocops. 2022 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET53225.2022.9882871
Manes, J. (2019). Secrecy & Evasion in Police Surveillance Technology. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 34(2), 503–566.
Power, D. J., Heavin, C., & O'Connor, Y. (2021). Balancing privacy rights and surveillance analytics: A decision process guide. Journal of Business Analytics, 4(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2021.1920856
Raposo, V. L. (2022). The Use of Facial Recognition Technology by Law Enforcement in Europe: A Non-Orwellian Draft Proposal. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29(4), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09512-y
Saheb, T. (2023). Ethically contentious aspects of artificial intelligence surveillance: A social science perspective. AI and Ethics, 3(2), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00196-y
Sapp, S. G., Dorius, S. F., Bertelson, K. A., & Harper, S. B. (2021). Public support for government use of network surveillance: An empirical assessment of public understanding of ethics in science administration. Public Understanding of Science, 31(4), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211049531
Schuck, A. (2015). Prevalence and Predictors of Surveillance Cameras in Law Enforcement: The Importance of Stakeholders and Community Factors. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415570631
Seabright, P., Stieglitz, J., & Van der Straeten, K. (2021). Evaluating social contract theory in the light of evolutionary social science. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3, e20. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.4
Singh, D. (2022). The Causes of Police Corruption and Working towards Prevention in Conflict-Stricken States. Laws, 11(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11050069
Urquhart, L., & Miranda, D. (2022). Policing faces: The present and future of intelligent facial surveillance. Information & Communications Technology Law, 31(2), 194– 219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2021.1994220
Van Brakel, R., & Hert, P. (2011). Policing, surveillance and law in a pre-crime society: Understanding the consequences of technology-based strategies. Journal of Police Studies, 20, 163–192.
Zheng, T. (2016). Advanced Surveillance Technologies: Privacy and Evidentiary Issues. Cornell Law School J.D. Student Research Papers. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/lps_papers/37
Copyright (c) 2024 Benjamin Kisio, Ndikaru wa Teresia, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
