Using Data Quality Audit as a Strategy for Improved Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights Programming

  • Marlyn Ochieng Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development
  • Miriam Chemutai Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development
  • Odida Denis Great Lakes University of Kisumu
  • Kevin Oria Great Lakes University of Kisumu
  • Sharon Otieno Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development
  • Alga Bala Great Lakes University of Kisumu
  • Grace Ochola Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development
  • Faith Chesire Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development
  • Wafula Charles, PhD Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development
Keywords: Data Quality Assurance, Data Verification, Monitoring, Evaluation
Share Article:

Abstract

Data Quality Audit is a critical process that entails constant assessment of a program’s data, identifies gaps, and informs correction for improved data quality. A majority of donor-funded programs rely on targets and reporting on achievements at the end of the implementation period to track progress. For this reason, it is critical for such institutions to report data that is accurate and complete, as this informs the next steps of the program in achieving the program’s aim. The quality of data generated from a program is a critical function of the program’s M&E systems and data verification processes. Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development (TICH) implemented a project for young people- Get Up Speak Out (GUSO) with an aim to achieve enjoyment of young people’s sexual and reproductive health and rights. The TICH-GUSO project adopted the USAID Guidelines to evaluate the M&E system, data verification processes and the data quality reported by program outcomes. The DQA was done twice at an interval of six months. Each DQA process entailed a two-stage process that entailed objective measurement of the M&E system and a data verification process to assess the data accuracy and completeness. The DQA process was done at the institution (data centre), where all the primary and secondary data are stored. The DQA process evidenced that audit and feedback facilitate learning and improvement. The second DQA recorded an improvement across all the sectors (M&E system, data verification process, and data quality). DQA processes are critical components of program implementation since they help identify weaknesses hence informing the type of correctional intervention needed to produce quality data, reports, and evidence for strengthening program implementation, future programming, policy recommendation and further research where needed. It is primary that programs and institutions at large adopt DQA processes for continuous improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., Van Harrison, R. T. K. E., Thorpe, K. E., & Perrier, L. (2006). Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. Jama, 296(9), 1094-1102.

Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., & Ivers, N. (2019). Audit and feedback as a quality strategy. Improving healthcare quality in Europe, 265.

Kiwanuka, D. H., Ayebare, F., Waiswa, P., Peterson, S. S., Tumushabe, E. K., & Fredriksson, M. (2017). Enablers and barriers to evidence-based planning in the district health system in Uganda; perceptions of district health managers. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 1-11.

United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). (2014). PEPFAR 3.0. Controlling the epidemic: Delivering on the promise of an AIDS-free generation. Washington, DC: Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator. https://www.pepfar.gov/documents/organization/234744.pdf

USAID. (2008). Data Quality Audit Tool, Guidelines for Implementation. https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/ms-08-29.html

Xiao, Y., Bochner, A. F., Makunike, B., Holec, M., Xaba, S., Tshimanga, M., Chitimbire, V., Barnhart, S., & Feldacker, C. (2017). Challenges in data quality: the influence of data quality assessments on data availability and completeness in a voluntary medical male circumcision programme in Zimbabwe. BMJ Open, 7(1), e013562.

Choice For Youth and Sexuality. (2017). Get Up Speak Out for Youth Rights Annual Report. https://www.choiceforyouth.org/assets/Docs/02ac7b1136/GUSO-Annual-Report-2017.pdf

Published
8 June, 2022
How to Cite
Ochieng, M., Chemutai, M., Denis, O., Oria, K., Otieno, S., Bala, A., Ochola, G., Chesire, F., & Charles, W. (2022). Using Data Quality Audit as a Strategy for Improved Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights Programming. East African Journal of Health and Science, 5(1), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajhs.5.1.697

Most read articles by the same author(s)