Medical Research Oversight and Conduct During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of the Kenya Medical Research Institute

  • Timothy Kiplagat Kenya Medical Research Institute
  • Daisy Cheruiyot Kenya Medical Research Institute
  • Enock Kipchirchir Kebenei Kenya Medical Research Institute
  • Gideon Cornel Msee Kenya Medical Research Institute
  • James Nguya Kenya Medical Research Institute
  • Elizabeth Bukusi Kenya Medical Research Institute
Keywords: Oversight, Research conduct, COVID-19 pandemic, Efficiency, Protocol
Share Article:


The containment measures introduced by the government of Kenya to minimise the spread and impact of SARS-CoV-2 inadvertently disrupted both the conduct of research and research oversight. At the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (SERU), submission of paper-based research protocols for review and in-person committee meetings were disrupted. In response, the KEMRI SERU changed operations from in-person to virtual meetings and from paper-based to e-mail submission of research protocols. This paper examines the continuity of research conduct and oversight during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was a cross-sectional study that utilised a qualitative approach. We successfully conducted 50 in-depth interviews with the following: KEMRI SERU committee members (18), KEMRI SERU-based research administrators (8), principal investigators affiliated with KEMRI (18) and principal investigators from other research institutes who utilise KEMRI SERU for review (NON-KEMRI affiliated PIs) (6). The participants were purposively sampled. Data was analysed thematically using Dedoose, with selected quotations chosen to illustrate key themes and sub-themes presented in text form. The study found that the adoption of e-mail submission of research protocols and virtual meetings ensured continuity of research conduct and oversight during the COVID-19 pandemic. The virtual meetings increased members’ attendance at the KEMRI SERU committee meetings, reduced travel and saved time and other costs related to in-person meetings. The email submission eliminated the need for physical storage of paper documents, enhanced flexibility, and saved resources like printing and handling bulky paper documents. The challenges included unstable internet connectivity and unfamiliarity with online platforms during virtual meetings. Despite some challenges, the transition to email submission and virtual meetings enabled research conduct and oversight continuity


Download data is not yet available.


Aung, H. M., Wai, K. T., Oo, Y. T. U., Thu, H. M., Htun, Z. T., & Silverman, H. J. G. B. E. (2020). Strengthening Quality Research Ethics Review in a Developing Country. 157.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

IJkema, R., Janssens, M., van der Post, J., & Licht, C. J. P. o. (2021). Ethical review of COVID-19 research in the Netherlands; a mixed-method evaluation among medical research ethics committees and investigators. 16(7), e0255040.

Mbabe, W., Ajayi, O., Bagula, A., Leenen, L., & Schoeman, N. (2021, 10-14 May 2021). A Workflow System for Managing Ethical Clearance in Research Work. 2021 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa),

Mokgatla, B., IJsselmuiden, C., Wassenaar, D., & Kasule, M. (2018). Mapping research ethics committees in Africa: Evidence of the growth of ethics review of health research in Africa. 18(4), 341- 348.

Mokgatla, B., Ngongo, P., & Jsselmuiden, C. (2017). Enhancing the Efficiency and Quality of African Research Ethics Review Processes – Through an Automated Review Platform. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research, 08.

Monaco, E., Pisano, L., Nasato, L., Lorenzoni, G., Gregori, D., & Martinato, M. (2020). Ethics committees in the time of COVID-19 [I comitati etici al tempo del COVID-19.]. (1120-9763 (Print)).

SocioCultural Research Consultants, L. P. (2013). Dedoose Version 4.5, web application for managing, analysing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data.

Thorne, S. (2008). Interpretive description (Vol. 2). Walnut Creek. In: CA: Left Coast Press.

Villarosa, A. R., Ramjan, L. M., Maneze, D., & George, A. J. S. (2021). Conducting population health research during the COVID-19 pandemic: impacts and recommendations. 13(6), 3320.

Weiner, D. L., Balasubramaniam, V., Shah, S. I., Javier, J. R., & on behalf of the Pediatric Policy, C. (2020). COVID-19 impact on research, lessons learned from COVID-19 research, implications for pediatric research. Pediatric Research, 88(2), 148-150.

Yagi, K. A.-O., Maeda, K. A.-O., Sakaguchi, S. A.-O. X., Chuma, M. A.-O. X., Sato, Y. A.-O., Kane, C. A.-O., . . . Yanagawa, H. A.-O. (2020). Status of Institutional Review Board Meetings Conducted Through Web Conference Systems in Japanese National University Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Questionnaire Study. (1438-8871 (Electronic)).

Zulu, J., Nalube, P., Changwe, R., & Mbewe, S. (2021). The Challenges and Opportunities of Using ZOOM App in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) During COVID-19 Pandemic: Lecturers’ and Students’ Perspective. VI, 2454-6194.

26 September, 2023
How to Cite
Kiplagat, T., Cheruiyot, D., Kebenei, E., Msee, G., Nguya, J., & Bukusi, E. (2023). Medical Research Oversight and Conduct During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of the Kenya Medical Research Institute. East African Journal of Health and Science, 6(1), 415-425.