Biogas Production from Biomass Kitchen Waste Laced with Cow Dung in a Modified Laboratory - Scale Anaerobic Digester

  • Wellington Andati Masinde Muliro University of Science & Technology
  • Danstone Lilechi Baraza Masinde Muliro university of science and Technology
  • Maxwell Mageto Masinde Muliro University of Science & Technology
Keywords: Biogas, Organic kitchen waste, Anaerobic digestion, Energy potential, Power potential
Share Article:

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is an effective method for organic pollution reduction and bio-energy production and has increasing applications worldwide. Produced biogas consists mainly of 50–70% methane and 30–50% carbon dioxide. The most common utilization route of biogas is for electricity production, often combined with utilization of the excess heat. This widens up the opportunities to utilize biogas in distant energy consumption locations. The study sort to design, build a laboratory-scale biogas digester and test and optimize the gas production from different types of organic kitchen wastes. Biomass Kitchen waste was collected, as feedstock for a laboratory-scale anaerobic digester (10L capacity) to produce biogas. This was done within a temperature range of 25°C - 35°C and in an alkaline environment maintained by adding a medium of sodium hydroxide. It was set to operate at constant gas pressure. The study has shown that using the displacement of water method in an inverted siphon system, we can sustain high pressure of the stored gas. The same idea can be used to pump this biogas to places far away from the digester for consumption. The biogas produced was then analyzed for its energy potential. The power potential of biogas produced by co-digesting kitchen waste and cow dung was found to be 22,461.77W/m3. Pure methane has a power potential of 37,258.9W/m3. Therefore, the methane percentage in the biogas collected in this study was 60.29%. The gas was also taken through gas chromatography to assess its constituents. Cow dung and starch were found to produce a higher percentage of methane. It is envisaged that the gas generated and the process friendly cost, will be a perfect alternative source of cleaner, safer and cheaper energy source as compared to the expensive and environmentally unfriendly traditional sources such as firewood, charcoal and petroleum products. This has great domestic and commercial application if exploited.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeyanju, A. A. (2008). Effect of seeding of wood-ash on biogas production using pig waste and cassava peels. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 3(3), 242-245.

Ananthakrishnan A. N. (2013). A glimpse into community and institutional biogas plants in Nepal. Nepal: GRIN Verlag.

Andati, W., Lilechi, D. B., Maxwell, M. M., & Kengara, F. O. (2017). Energy Evaluation and Qualitative Analysis of Biogas Produced from Co-Digesting Kitchen Waste and Cow Dung. Physical Science International Journal, 16(4): 1-13. (2017).

Babel, S., Sae-Tang, J., & Pecharaply, A. (2009). Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage and brewery sludge for biogas production and land application. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 6(1), 131-140.

Balat, M., & Balat, H. (2009). Biogas as a renewable energy source—a review. Energy Sources, Part A, 31(14), 1280-1293.

Beth D. & Nate L. (2008). Methane digesters, Echotechnical note. North Fort Myers FL, USA: ECHO.

Budiyano I. N, Widiasa Johari and & Sunarso S. (2010). The kinetic of biogas production rate from cattle manure in batch mode. International Journal of chemical and biological Engineering, 3(1), 39-45.

Ezekoye, V. A., & Okeke, C. E. (2006). Design, construction, and performance evaluation of plastic biodigester and the storage of biogas. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 7(2), 176-184.

Georgiadis, I. (2013). Biogas production from black water, kitchen refuse and farm waste: lab assessment and practical application at MCF Yatta, Kenya (Master's thesis). Oslo: Norwegian University of Life sciences.

Gerardi, M. H. (2003). The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

Hill, D. T. (1983). Simplified Monod kinetics of methane fermentation of animal wastes. Agricultural wastes, 5(1), 1-16.

House, H., & Eng, P. (2007, April). Alternative Energy Sources–Biogas Production. In Proceedings of the London swine conference-today’s challenges-tomorrow’s opportunities, London, Ontario (pp. 3-4).

Ilori, M. O., Adebusoye, S. A., Iawal, A. K., & Awotiwon, O. A. (2007). Production of biogas from banana and plantain peels. Advances in Environmental Biology, 33-39.

Mshandete, A. M., & Parawira, W. (2009). Biogas technology research in selected sub-Saharan African countries–A review. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(2) 116-125.

Nnabuchi, M. N., Akubuko, F. O., Augustine, C., & Ugwu, G. Z. (2012). Assessment of the effect of co-digestion of chicken dropping and cow dung on biogas generation. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 12(7), 21-26.

RISE-AT, N. (1998). Review of current status of anaerobic digestion technology for treatment of municipal solid waste. Regional Information Service Center for South East Asia on Appropriate Technology, Institute of Scientific and Technical Research and Development, Chiang Mai University.

Published
23 December, 2019
How to Cite
Andati, W., Baraza, D., & Mageto, M. (2019). Biogas Production from Biomass Kitchen Waste Laced with Cow Dung in a Modified Laboratory - Scale Anaerobic Digester. East African Journal of Health and Science, 1(2), 53-61. Retrieved from https://journals.eanso.org/index.php/eajhs/article/view/13