The Role of Forest Certification in Enhancing Livelihoods of Local Communities: Evidence from Certified Village Land Forest Reserves at Nanjirinji and Likawage Villages, Southern Part of Tanzania
Abstract
Community-based Forest Management (CBFM) has emerged as a vital tool for promoting sustainable forest management and improving the livelihoods of local communities dependent on forest resources. This paper examines the role of forest certification within CBFM, mainly Village Land Forest Reserves (VLFR), in enhancing the livelihoods of communities and forest governance in the southern part of Tanzania. The villages were selected purposively using five criteria, such as the existence of an up-to-date management plan, good record keeping, an active and functional forest committee, good experience in implementing Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) group certification and forest size. Mixed-methods approach, including household surveys, key informant interviews and field observations, were used to collect information. During the household surveys, random sampling was used to select households. The sample size of 85 households were surveyed, where 39 were from Likawage and 46 from Nanjirinji village. Content analysis was used for qualitative data, where the data were compiled and responses coded, identifying the range of responses to each question, creating matrices in SPSS that cross-listed each response variable by village. These were done through descriptive statistics, where measures of central tendency, such as means, median, percentage and counts, were computed. The results indicate that certified forests improve communities’ livelihood through increased employment opportunities, access to markets for forest products and better forest governance. Additionally, certification has contributed to capacity-building and the empowerment of local communities in forest management. Challenges such as limited financial resources, inadequate knowledge, and logistical constraints hindered the full realisation of certification benefits. The study concludes that forest certification offers significant potential for improving livelihoods. It reveals significant social, environmental and economic benefits, where 92 and 98 percent of Likawage and Nanjirinji A households, respectively, responded that there are some improvements in education, healthcare and food security. To maximise the benefits of forest certification, efforts should focus on strengthening market access, capacity building, and policy support. Improving trade linkages, infrastructure, and value-added processing can enhance economic returns for certified communities. Expanding training programs on sustainable forestry, business skills, and cooperative management will empower locals to better utilise certification benefits.
Downloads
References
Acharya, R. P., & Gyanendra, K. (2021). Does Forest Certification Improve Socio-Economic and Governance Issues? A Case of Community Forestry from Nepal. May.
Adler, K., Salanterä, S., & Zumstein-Shaha, M. (2019). Focus Group Interviews in Child, Youth, and Parent Research: An Integrative Literature Review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919887274
Bartlett II, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Determing appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43–50. https://www.opalco.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Reading-Sample-Size1.pdf
Blackman, A., Raimondi, A., Cubbage, F., Blackman, A., Raimondi, A., & Cubbage, F. (2014). Environment for Development Does Forest Certification in Developing Countries Have Environmental Benefits? Insights from Mexican Corrective Action.
Cerutti, P. O., Lescuyer, G., Tacconi, L., Eba’a Atyi, R., Essiane, E., Nasi, R., Eckebil, P. P. T., & Tsanga, R. (2017). Social impacts of the forest stewardship council certification in the Congo Basin. International Forestry Review, 19(1), 50–63.
Degnet, M. B., van der Werf, E., Ingram, V., & Wesseler, J. (2022). Community perceptions: A comparative analysis of community participation in forest management: FSC-certified and non-certified plantations in Mozambique. Forest Policy and Economics, 143. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.forpol.2022.102815
Delice, A. (2001). The sampling issues in quantitative research. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practices, 10(4), 2001–2019.
Dharmawan, A. H., Mardiyaningsih, D. I., & Isiyana Wianti, N. I. (2012). Working paper series No. 03 Analysis of smallholding forest livelihood system: timber certification and its socio-economic impacts (case studies of three regencies of Central Java province of Indonesia) By: Center for International Forestry Research. 03.
Elliott, C., & Oesten, G. (2015). Social and political dimensions of forest certification.
Frey, G. E., Charnley, S., & Makala, J. (2022). The Costs and Benefits of Certification for Community Forests Managed by Traditional Peoples in South-Eastern Tanzania. International Forestry Review, 24(3), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1505/ 146554822835941832
Haji, L., Valizadeh, N., & Hayati, D. (2020). Metadata of the chapter that will be visualized in SpringerLink (Issue October). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56542-8
Islands, S., Lal, P. N., & Pacific, L. (2012). The Benefit of Forest Certification. 1–4.
John, E., Bunting, P., Hardy, A., & Silayo, D. S. (2021). A Forest Monitoring System for Tanzania. 1–29.
Kalonga, S. K., Kulindwa, K. A., Mshale, B. I., & Håkon, L. (2014). There are several forest certification schemes globally; Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is one of them. FSC is an international, multi-stakeholder organization established in 1993 by the world‘s leading environmental groups and their allies to pr. 1.
Kalonga, S. K., Midtgaard, F., & Klanderud, K. (2016). Forest certification as a policy option in conserving biodiversity: An empirical study of forest management in Tanzania. Forest Ecology and Management, 361, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.034
Killian, B., & Hyle, M. (2020). Forest Policy and Economics Women’s marginalization in participatory forest management: Impacts of responsibilization in Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, 118 (April 2019), 102252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol. 2020.102252
Lokina, R. (2014). Forest Reform in Tanzania: A Review of Policy and Legislation. African Journal of Economic Review, 2(2), 125–149.
Magessa, K., Wynne-jones, S., & Hockley, N. (2020). Forest Policy and Economics Does Tanzanian participatory forest management policy achieve its governance objectives? Forest Policy and Economics, 111(November 2019), 102077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. forpol.2019.102077
Malek, E. J., & Abdul Rahim, A. R. (2022). A thematic review of forest certification publications from 2017 to 2021: Analysis of pattern and trends for future studies. Trees, Forests and People, 10(August),
Marx, A., & Cuypers, D. (2010). Forest certification as a global environmental governance tool: What is the macro-effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council? Regulation and Governance, 4(4), 408–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01088.x
MCDI. (2015). Mpingo Conservation & Development Initiative Combining REDD, PFM and FSC certification in South-Eastern Tanzania Final Report 2015.
Molnar, A., Butterfield, R., Chapela, F., Fuge, P., De Freitas, A., Hayward, J., Jansens, J. W., Jenkins, M., Madrid, S., Martin, A., Rezende De Azevedo, T., Ridder, M., Smith, P., Soza, C., & White, A. (2004). Forest certification and communities. International Forestry Review, 6(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.6.2.173.38393
Nghonda, D. N., Muteya, H. K., Salomon, W., & Mushagalusa, F. C. (2024). Diversity, Regeneration Potential, and Natural Restoration of Miombo along an Anthropization Gradient in the Rural Area of Lubumbashi (Upper-Katanga, D. R. Congo). June.
Paluš, H., Krahulcov, M., & Parobek, J. (2021). Assessment of Forest Certification as a Tool to Support Forest Ecosystem Services.
Pokhrel, R. K., & Gautam, A. P. (2024). Community forest, environment conservation and rural livelihood. 17, 151–162.
Teketay., D., Abada., M. M. M., Kalonga., S. K., & Ahimin., O. (2016). Forest certification in Africa: achievements, challenges and.
Tuan, N. T. T. (2015). Economic efficiencies of the forest certification group in Trung Son commune, Gio Linh district, Quang Tri province. December.
UN. (2021). The Global Forest Goals Report.
URT. (2021). National Forest Policy Implementation Strategy (2021-2031). May, 89.
URT. (2022). Administrative Units Population Distribution Report.
Wolff, S., & Schweinle, J. (2022). Effectiveness and Economic Viability of Forest Certification: A Systematic Review. In Forests (Vol. 13, Issue 5). MDPI.
Zubizarreta, M., Arana-Landín, G., & Cuadrado, J. (2021). Forest certification in Spain: Analysis of certification drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294.
Zubizarreta, M., Arana-landín, G., Wolff, S., & Egiluz, Z. (2022). Assessing the economic impacts of forest certification in Spain: A longitudinal study assessing the economic impacts of forest certification in Spain: A longitudinal study. Ecological Economics, 204(PA).
Zwerts, J. A., Sterck, E. H. M., Verweij, P. A., Maisels, F., Waarde, J., Geelen, E. A. M., Tchoumba, G. B., Zebaze, H. F. D., & Kuijk, M. (2024). FSC-certified forest management benefits large mammals compared to non-FSC. 628 (April). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07257-8
Copyright (c) 2025 Nsajigwa Nassan Katungila, Gimbage Ernest Mbeyale, PhD, Kajenje Magessa Nkukurah, PhD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.