Investigating the Constraints Limiting the Contribution of the National Cashew Producers Union (FO) in Improving the Productivity of the Cashew-Based Agroforestry Systems in Burkina Faso (West Africa)

  • Yacouba Noël Coulibaly, PhD Institut de l‘Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles
  • Salfo Ouédraogo Projet d’appui au développement de l’anacarde dans le bassin de la comoé pour la redd+
  • Gérard Zombré, PhD Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo
Keywords: Yield, Production, Producers, Organisation, Climate
Share Article:

Abstract

The producer organisations contribute to improving agricultural productivity. This research investigated the constraints limiting the contribution of the national cashew producer’s Union (FO) in the productivity of the cashew-based agroforestry systems (AF) to help in the planning of future interventions for increasing AF productivity through FO. The study was conducted in the 04 main regions of cashew production. The data relating to the FO characterisation, operation, services and quality and new service delivery expected by the members were collected using the surveys through 33 individual producers and 118 producers through 7 focus groups totalling 151 respondents. The lack of communication, the low education level, the low memberships and memberships fees, the low women memberships, the lack of the supervisory board, the large geographical cover and producer members and the responsible selection method were the identified constraints related to the structure, characterisation and operation that could reduce the FO contribution in AF productivity. The FO services delivery contributes to AF productivity, but they need to be strengthened through providing new services such as producers’ access to credit, building the producers’ resilience to climate change, construction of storage facilities and increasing memberships for a greater impact on AF productivity. The FO should increase the service delivery related to group sales for FO to improve AF productivity. The results of this research could serve the actors interested in improving productivity through farmers’ groups in the planning of their future interventions for increasing AF productivity through the FO

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abate, G. T., Francesconi, G. N., & Getnet, K. (2014). Impact of agricultural cooperatives on smallholders’ technical efficiency: empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Ann. Public Cooperative Econ., 85 (2), 257-286.

Abebaw, D., & Haile, M.G. (2013). The Impact of Cooperatives on Agricultural Technology Adoption: Empirical Evidence from Ethiopia. Food Policy, 38, 82-91.

Abera, W., Assen, M., & Budds, J. (2020). Determinant of agricultural land management practices among smallholders farmers in the Wanka watershed, northwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 99,104841.

Achancho, V. (2012). The role of farmers’ organisations in professionalising agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of Cameroon. Doctoral thesis, AgroParisTech, 417p.

Ainembabazi, J. H., van Asten, P., Vanlauwe, B., Ouma, E., Blomme, G., Birachi, E. A., Nguezet, P. M. D., Mignouna, D. B., & Manyong, V. M. (2017). Improving the speed of adoption of agricultural technologies and farm performance through farmer groups: evidence from the Great Lakes region of Africa. Agric. Econ.: 48 (2), 241-259.

Anang, B. T., & Asante, B. O. (2020). Farm household access to agricultural services in northern Ghana. Heliyon 6 (11), e05517

Asimi, S. (2009). Influence of soil fertility management methods on microbial activity in a long-term crop system in Burkina Faso. Doctoral thesis, Bobo Dioulasso Polytechnic University.

Assouto, A. B., Houensou, D. A., & Semedo, G. (2020). Price risk and farmers’ decisions: A case study from Benin. Sci. Afr., 8: e00311.

Belem, B. C. D. (2017). Analysis of the determinants of the cashew good production practices adoption. Master Report, University of Laval, Canada.

Benitew-Altuna, F., Trienekens, J., Materia, V. C., & Bijiman, J. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption of ecological intensification practices. A case study in vegetable production in Chile. Agric. Syst., 194, 103283.

Bijman, J., & Wijers, G. (2019). Exploring the inclusiveness of producer cooperatives. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 41, 74–79.

Bizikova, L., Nkonya, E., Minah, M., Hanisch, M., Turaga, R. M. R., Speranza, C. I., Karthikeyan, M., Tang, L., Ghezzi-Kopel, K., Kelly, J., Celestin, A. C., & Timmers, B. (2020). A scoping review of the contributions of farmers’ organisations to smallholder agriculture. Nat. Food, 1:620-630.

Chindi, A., Shunka, E., Solomon, A., Gebremedhin, W. G., Seid, E., & Tessema, L. (2017). Participatory potato seed production: a breakthrough for food security and income generation in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Open Agriculture, 2(1), 205-212.

Chirwa, E., & Kydd, J. (2006). Study on Farmer Organisations in Smallholder Tea in Malawi. 2005. Final Report. Zomba, Malawi.

Coulibaly, Y. N., Taita, P., Ouédraogo, S., Ouédraogo, J., & Zombré, G. (2022). Evaluation, identification and improvement of the constraints related to access to microcredit by producers for a better productivity of agroforestry systems with cashew in Burkina Faso. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., 16 (4), 1676-1690.

Darkwah, K. A., Kwawu, J. D., Agyire-Tettey, F., & Sarpong, D. B. (2019). Assessment of determinant that influence the adoption of sustainable soil and water conservation practices in Techiman municipality of Ghana. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 7 (3), 248-257.

Deshmukh, A. R., Deokar, D. K., Jadhav, S. S., & Nimase, R. G. (2009). Study of present working, financial position, business turn-over and business gain (profit/loss) of dairy co-operation societies of Raigad district. Asian J. Anim. Sci., 4, 226–230.

DGPER. (2019). documents of the national strategy for cashew sector development in Burkina Faso, DGPER, 74p.

DGPER. (2015). Brief presentation of the cashew sector. Ouagadougou, DGPER, 25p.

Diaz, R. T., Osorio, D. P., Hernadez, M. E., Pallares, M. M., Canales, F. A., Patermina, A. C., & Gonzales, A. E. (2021). Socioeconomic determinants that influence the agricultural practices of small farm families in northern Columbia. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., 21, 440-451.

Garcia, G., Gutiérrez-Montes, I., Hernadez Nunez, H. E., Suarez Salazar, J. C., & Casamoves, F. (2020). Relevance of local knowledge in decision making and rural innovation: a methodological proposal for leveraging the participation of Columbian cocoa producers. J. rural studies, 75, 119-124.

Gedara, M., Wilson, C., Pascoe, S., & Robinson, T. (2012). Factors Affecting Technical Efficiency of Rice Farmers in Village Reservoir Irrigation Systems of Sri Lanka. J. Agric. Econ., 63(3), 627-638.

Luviene, N., Stitely, A., & Hoyt, L. (2010). Sustainable Economic Democracy: Worker Cooperatives for the 21st Century. Community Innovators Lab, MITCoLAB, 30p.

Marlos, B. A., Claudivan, F., lacerda, D. E., Enéas gomes, F., Carlos de abreu, B., & José Prisco, T. (2007). Physiology of cashew plants grown under adverse conditions. Brazilian J. of Plant Physiol., 19(4), 449-461.

Mazvimavi, K., & Twomlow, S. (2009). Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing the adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. Agric. Syst., 101(1-2), 20-29.

Meier zu Selhausen, F. (2016). What determines women’s participation in collective action? Evidence from a western Ugandan coffee cooperative. Fem. Econ., 22, 130–157.

Nkomoki, W., Bavorova, M., & Banout, J. (2018). Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and food security threats; effects of land tenure in Zambia. Land use policy, 78, 532-538.

Nugawela, P., Baldé, A., & Poublanc, C. (2006). The cashew value chain in Senegal, analysis and strategic framework of initiatives for the growth of the sector. USAID Program/ Economic Growth.

Oyetunde-Usman, Z., Olagunju, K. O., & Ogunpaimo, O. R. (2021). Determinant of adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Nigeria. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 9 (2), 241-248.

Ricau, P. (2013). Know and understand the international cashew market.

Sali, B., Madou, C., Nome, A., & Kuate, J. (2020). Socioeconomic characterisation of the large cashew production areas and behavioural study of their plantations in northern Cameroon. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., 14(6), 2094-2111.

Sarah, A. (2014). Innovation systems and territories: interactions; examples of cashew and jatropha in the southwest of Burkina Faso. PhD thesis, Panthéon-Sorbonne University - Paris I, France.

Somé, L. F. M. C. (2014). Socioeconomic analysis of the cashew production systems in Burkina Faso: case of the Cascades and Hauts-Bassins regions. Master Report, Institute of rural development, University of Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

Soro, D., Dornier, M., Abreu, F., Assidjo, E., Yao, B., & Reynes, M. (2011). The cashew (Anacardium occidentale) industry in Côte d’Ivoire: analysis and prospects for development. Fruits, 66, 237–245.

Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B., & Kohlin, G. (2013). Cropping system diversification, conservation tillage and modern seed adoption in Ethiopia; impacts on household income, agrochemical use and demand for labor. Ecol. Econ., 93, 85-93.

UNPA/BF. (2014). Database of the producers affiliated for the years 2011 to 2013.

Verhofstadt, E., & Maertens, M. (2014). Smallholder cooperatives and agricultural performance in Rwanda: do organisational differences matter? Agric. Econ., 45 (1), 39-52.

Wassie, S. B., Kusakari, H., & Masahiro, S. (2019). Inclusiveness and effectiveness of agricultural cooperatives: recent evidence from Ethiopia. Int. J. Soc. Econ., (46), 614–630.

Xiao, P., George, H., & Wendong, D. (2016). Communication and Innovation in Cooperatives. J. Knowl. Econ., 9, 1184–1209.

Published
13 August, 2023
How to Cite
Coulibaly, Y., Ouédraogo, S., & Zombré, G. (2023). Investigating the Constraints Limiting the Contribution of the National Cashew Producers Union (FO) in Improving the Productivity of the Cashew-Based Agroforestry Systems in Burkina Faso (West Africa). East African Journal of Forestry and Agroforestry, 6(1), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajfa.6.1.1365