Gender Dynamics and Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Maasai Mara Game Reserve, Kenya
Abstract
A big factor as to why Human-Wildlife Conflict is a major issue in the African context than in the western world is the level of income stability. This is heightened by the fact that most communities that live near wildlife settlements in Africa are poor rural communities. The people in the Mara are a good example of such a community. One of the reasons why this plague has been so persistent is because the rules and regulations are too broad and do not factor in the differences within the communities that live within reach of wildlife populations. This research has singled out the main difference within these communities as being gender and focuses on gendered differences. The objective of this research is to examine the gender dynamics that affect Human-Wildlife Conflicts. To fulfil the objective, the research set out to test the hypothesis of whether gender dynamics influence wildlife conservation measures. The methodology for this research was guided by a descriptive research design which entailed the use of observation, questionnaires, and interviews to gather data. The samples were automatically classified into the two established genders, male and female. The findings concluded that the following attributes affect how the genders interact with Human-Wildlife Conflicts household roles, agricultural occupation, income loss, injuries, land ownership, and marital status. This was because the null hypothesis was disproved. After all, the p-value: =0.006435 was less than the agreed significance level of 0.05. These results indicate that there is a correlation between gender dynamics and Human-Wildlife Conflict. Therefore, gender mainstreaming needs to be considered in the wildlife conservation discourse.
Downloads
References
Abudulghafur, F. (2013). Influence of Kenya wildlife conservation education program on reducing human wildlife conflict. (University of Nairobi).
Bechtel, J. D. (2010). Gender, Poverty and the Conservation of Biodiversity: A Review of Issues and Opportunities. MacArthur Foundation Conservation White Paper Series.
Bhatia, S., Redpath, S. M., Suryawanshi, K., & Mishra, C. (2020). Beyond conflict: Exploring the spectrum of human-wildlife interactions and their underlying mechanisms. ORYX, 54(5), 621– 628. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531800159X
Birkhoff, J. E. (2021). Gender, Conflict and Conflict Resolution. https://www.mediate.com/articles/birkhoff.cfm
Bob, U., Perry, E., & Potgieter, C. (2010). Environmental conflicts and women’s vulnerability in Africa. https://www.accord.org.za/ajcr-issues/environmental-conflicts-and-womens-vulnerability-in-africa/
Carter, N. H., & Allendorf, T. D. (2016). Gendered perceptions of tigers in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Biological Conservation, 202, 69– 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.002
Choden, T. (2017). Gender Assessment: Gender Mainstreaming Analysis and Action Plan Final. Green Climate Fund.
Convention on Biological Diversity. (2011). Addressing Gender Issues and Actions in Biodiversity Objectives. Montreal.
Coric, D. (2014). Ecofeminism as a way of resolving some environmental issues. Proceedings for Social Sciences Matica Srpska, January(148), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn1448551c
Cullen, A., Anderson, C. L., Biscaye, P., & Lawrence, A. (2020). Gender-associated differences in risk attitudes and perceptions among farmers in Mali. Wahington DC.
Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict : the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human – wildlife conflict. 13(Table 1), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x
Ding, H., Veit, P. G., Blackman, A., Gray, E., Reytar, K., Altamirano, J. C., & Hodgdon, B. (2016). Climate benefits, tenure costs. The economic case for securing indigenous land rights in the Amazon. World Resources Institute, 98. https://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/Climate_Benefits_Tenure_Costs.pdf%0Ahttp://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/Climate_Benefits_Tenure_Costs.pdf
FAO. (2009). Human-wildlife conflict in Africa: causes, consequences and management strategies (No. 157). Rome.
Gore, M. L., & Kahler, J. S. (2012). Gendered Risk Perceptions Associated with Human- Wildlife Conflict : Implications for Participatory Conservation. 7(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032901
Hadidian, J., Fox, Camilla, H., & Lynn, William, S. (2006). The ethics of wildlife control in humanised landscapes. Ecology Collection, 13. https://doi.org/10.5070/v422110054
Hitchcock, J. (2001). Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Broadening the Contexts. RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002), 12(3), 4.
Hurlbert, M., & Krishnaswamy, J. (2019). Risk management and decision-making in relation to sustainable development. In A Man Without Words. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520959316-013
IUCN. (2020). Gender and the environment: What are the barriers to gender equality in sustainable ecosystem management? https://www.iucn.org/news/gender/202001/gender-and-environment-what-are-barriers-gender-equality-sustainable-ecosystem-management
Joseph, M. M., Joseph, O. O., Erustus, K., & Eivin, R. (2019). Trends in compensation for human-wildlife conflict losses in Kenya. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 11(3), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2019.1278
Khumalo, K. E., & Yung, L. A. (2015). Women, human-wildlife conflict, and CBNRM: Hidden impacts and vulnerabilities in Kwandu Conservancy, Namibia. Conservation and Society, 13(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.170395
Lute, M. L., & Gore, M. L. (2019). Broadening the aperture on coexistence with wildlife through the lenses of identity, risk and morals. Human-Wildlife Interactions: Turning Conflict into Coexistence, (May), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235730.006
Lute, M. L., Navarrete, C. D., Nelson, M. P., & Gore, M. L. (2016). Moral dimensions of human–wildlife conflict. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12731
Machoka, L. N (2017). Factors Influencing Human Wildlife Conflict in Communities Surrounding Protected Areas: a Case of Kenya Wildlife Service Focusing on Maasai Mara National Reserve, Narok County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
Manoa, D. O. (2015). Assessment of Predator-Proof Bomas As an Evidence-Based Conservation Tool in Loitokitok Sub-County, Kenya (University of Nairobi).
Michael, E., Zimmerman, J., Baird, C., George, S., Karen, J., & Warren, J. C. (Eds.) (1993). Introduction to ecofeminism. Environmental Philosophy:From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. https://systemicalternatives.org/2016/10/24/introduction-to-ecofeminism/
MMWCA. (2019). State of Mara conservancies report. Maasai Mara Wildlife Conservancies Association. www.maraconservancies.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Conservancies-Report-2019.pdf
Montt, G., & Fraga, F. (2018). The future of work in a changing natural environment: Climate change, degradation and sustainability (1st ed.; International Labour Office, Ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
Morzillo, A. T., de Beurs, K. M., & Martin-Mikle, C. J. (2014). A conceptual framework to evaluate human-wildlife interactions within coupled human and natural systems. Ecology and Society, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06883-190344
Muruthi, P. (2005). Human Wildlife Conflict: Lessons Learned From AWF’s African Heartlands. Nairobi.
Ndege, A. W., & Gichuki, N. N. (2017). Factors Influencing Performance of Wildlife Conservation Projects: A Case of Lion Rover Project in Meru National Park, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management, 2(1), 316–334.
Nyaga, R. K. (2010). Earnings and employment sector choice in Kenya (No. 199). Nairobi.
Nyhus, P. J. (2016). Human–Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085634
Ogra, M., & Badola, R. (2008). Compensating Human – Wildlife Conflict in Protected Area Communities : Ground-Level Perspectives from Uttarakhand , India. Human Ecology, 36, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9189-y
Ogra, M. V. (2008). Human-wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: A case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum, 39(3), 1408–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.12.004
Olson, J. (2015). Adaptive Management to End Human-Wildlife Conflict – Global Wildlife Conservation Group. https://sites.utexas.edu/wildlife/2015/05/07/adaptive-management-to-end-human-wildlife-conflict/
Salman, A. (2007). Ecofeminist movements-from the north to the South. Pakistan Development Review, 46(4), 853– 864. https://doi.org/10.30541/v46i4iipp.853-864
Seager, J. (2021). Gender and illegal wildlife trade : overlooked and underestimated. WWF.
SIDA. (2015). Gender Analysis – Principles & Elements: SIDA definitions. Gender Tool Box, (March), 1–4.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
The Maasai Mara Science and Development Initiative. (2015). Maasai Mara: The Challenges of a World Unique Ecosystem.
UN. (2004). Understanding poverty from a gender perspective. 52(June).
Wild Alive. (2021). Wildlife-Human Conflicts impacting Global Food Security: A challenge and it’s Mitigation Strategies. https://lifeofsapiens.blogspot.com/2021/05/wildlife-human-conflicts-impacting.html
World Bank. (2012). Linking Gender, Environment, and Poverty for Sustainable Development: A Synthesis Report on Ethiopia and Ghana. https://doi.org/P125713
WWF. (2020). Reducing conflict between people and wildlife | WWF. https://wwf.panda.org/our_work/wildlife/human_wildlife_conflict/
Copyright (c) 2022 Marie Auma Omed, Christine Majale, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
