Dimensions of Urban Park Use in Nairobi County in Kenya
Abstract
Urban parks play an integral part in the social, economic, and environmental wellbeing of the society they serve. Apart from their aesthetic value, they are a source of income, help in the purification of air, as well as being set for both passive and active recreation for improved health. Through research and case studies, it has been established that some of these parks either sometimes fail to serve their intended purpose while others fail in some aspects. This study, therefore, aims to investigate the general usage of the six gazetted urban parks in Nairobi County. Through the review of relevant literature, visitation trends, location, diversity of activities, gender, and duration of stay were found to be key determinants of the way the parks are used. A sample size of 243 convex spaces, was used for the study. Interviews and observation methods were used to gather relevant information on the use of the park spaces while data collection tools used included observation schedules, checklists, and photography. Thereafter, descriptive and correlation methods were used in the collected data analysis. The study found out that majority of urban park users were male and mostly those self-employed or jobless. The frequency of park visits was greatly affected by lack of time to visit and understanding of various benefits associated with park visits. Visitors preferred visiting with friends or in groups and stated relaxation as the main reason for visiting the parks
Downloads
References
Babey, Susan & Brown, E & Hastert, T. (2006). Access to Safe parks helps increase physical activity among teenagers. Policy brief (UCLA Center for Health Policy Research). 1-6.
Baum, C. P. (2002). Opportunity structures: urban landscape, social capital and health promotion
in Australia. Health promotion international, 351-361.
Beck, H. (2009). Linking the quality of public spaces to quality of life. Journal of Place Management and Development.
Cohen, D. A., Ashwood, J. S., Scott, M. M., Overton, A., Evenson, K. R., Staten, L. K., ... & Catellier, D. (2006). Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics, 118(5), e1381-e1389.
Coles, R. W., & Bussey, S. C. (2000). Urban forest landscapes in the UK—progressing the social agenda. Landscape and urban planning, 52(2-3), 181-188.
Deister, L. (2013). Designing Landscape as Infrastructure Water senstive open space design in Cairo. Cairo: Ain Shams University.
Gravin, R., McCormack, Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & place, 16(4), 712-726.
Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings (Vol. 23). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Giles-Corti, B., Timperio, A., Bull, F., & Pikora, T. (2005). Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models. Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 33(4), 175-181.
Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban forestry & urban greening, 2(1), 1-18.
Hayward, J. (1989). Urban parks. In public places and spaces (pp. 193-216). Springer, Boston, MA.
Kaplan, R. & Matsuoka, R. H. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and urban planning, 84(1), 7-19.
Kellet, J. (2009). Creating active communities. South Australia: School of nature and built environment.
McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & place, 16(4), 712-726.
Mugenda O.M., and Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research Methods. Quantitative & Qualitative
Approaches. Nairobi: Press African Center for Technology Studies (ACTS).
Ottensmann, J. R., & Lindsey, G. (2008). A use-based measure of accessibility to linear features to predict urban trail use. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 1(1), 41-63.
Peters, K., Elands, B., & Buijs, A. (2010). Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban forestry & urban greening, 9(2), 93-100.
Saika U. & Kikuchi T. (2017). Classification of Urban Parks and their Regional
Characteristics in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B 6.
Solecki, W. D., & Welch, J. M. (1995). Urban parks: green spaces or green walls? Landscape and urban planning, 32(2), 93-106.
Ulrich Roger, S., Simons Robert, F., Losito Barbara, D., & Fiorito Evelyn, M. M. A. Zelson Michael, (1991). Stress Recovery During Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.
Van Herzele, A., & Wiedemann, T. (2003). A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and urban planning, 63(2), 109-126.
Zhang, X., Lu, H., & Holt, J. B. (2011). Modeling spatial accessibility to parks: a national study. International journal of health geographics, 10(1), 1-14.
Copyright (c) 2021 Mathias Loki Mutisya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
