Comparative Analysis of the Acceptability of Bamboo and Wood Products and Their Utilisation in the Construction Industry
Abstract
Bamboo has emerged globally as a sustainable and versatile alternative to timber due to its strength, rapid growth, and wide range of applications. This study examined the acceptability of bamboo products compared to wood products in Narok North Sub-County, with a focus on construction, fuelwood, basketry, and furniture. The study objectives were to assess the economic potential of bamboo, compare levels of acceptability between bamboo and timber, and evaluate community perceptions of durability, affordability, and quality. A mixed-methods design was adopted, involving household questionnaires, interviews with environmental and forestry officers, focus group discussions, and photography. Quantitative data were analysed using percentages, chi-square tests, and descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were summarised thematically. Results revealed that while timber remains dominant for fuelwood (85.3%) and furniture (92.2%), bamboo was highly preferred for basketry (89.2%) and exhibited strong potential in construction, with 70.6% of respondents indicating willingness to adopt bamboo if raw materials were readily available. Chi-square tests indicated significant associations between current and potential uses of bamboo for fuelwood (χ²=18.242, p<0.001), furniture (χ²=11.461, p<0.01), and construction (χ²=3.913, p<0.05). However, no significant associations were found in basketry (χ²=1.193, p=0.275) or raw material availability (χ²=0.175, p=0.676). Respondents cited affordability, environmental sustainability, and durability as key drivers of acceptability, though timber was still perceived as higher quality where modern bamboo processing and value-addition technologies were lacking. The findings demonstrate that bamboo holds significant promise as an alternative to timber, particularly in construction and basketry, but barriers such as weak supply chains, lack of treatment standards, and limited awareness constrain its adoption. With policy support, value-addition technologies, and community sensitisation, bamboo could play a transformative role in reducing deforestation, supporting livelihoods, and advancing sustainable development in Kenya.
Downloads
References
Amede, T., Worku, T., & Desta, L. (2021). Bamboo-based sustainable housing solutions in Africa. Journal of Building and Housing Research, 15(2), 45–59.
Chan, A., Li, H., & Wang, Z. (2023). Mechanical properties and construction potential of engineered bamboo. Construction and Building Materials, 375, 130–145.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Gelaw, Y., Mekuria, B., & Teshome, A. (2025). Bamboo furniture innovations and challenges in Ethiopia. African Journal of Forestry and Wood Science, 12(1), 33–51.
Gupta, R., Huang, X., & Li, Y. (2025). Value addition in bamboo industries: Lessons from China. International Journal of Sustainable Materials, 9(4), 112–128.
KNBS. (2019). 2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census: Volume I – Population by County and Sub-County. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
Kumar, P., Sharma, R., & Singh, V. (2023). Bamboo adoption in Indian construction: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Sustainable Architecture, 18(3), 205–219.
Liu, S., Zhang, Y., & Chen, M. (2022). Cultural transmission and challenges in bamboo basketry practices. International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 17, 84–99.
Minale, A., Tesfaye, G., & Alemu, K. (2020). Bamboo resources and utilization in Africa: Potentials and constraints. Journal of Natural Resources and Forestry, 14(2), 122–136.
Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. ACTS Press.
Mutisya, E., Omondi, P., & Mwangi, J. (2021). Household cooking energy in Kenya: Adoption of improved technologies. Energy for Sustainable Development, 65, 35–44.
Nassiuma, D. K. (2000). Survey sampling: Theory and methods. University of Nairobi Press.
Nguyen, T., Vo, D., & Tran, H. (2024). Bamboo versus timber: A comparative study of sustainability and affordability. Journal of Environmental Economics, 21(2), 98–115.
Nurdiah, E. A. (2016). Bamboo as sustainable building material. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.014
Ojelabi, R., Adewumi, T., & Ebekozien, A. (2025). Technological constraints in bamboo utilization in Africa. Journal of Sustainable Construction, 19(1), 77–90.
Opuku, A., Danso, H., & Frimpong, A. (2016). Durability challenges of bamboo in African housing. Ghana Journal of Construction Studies, 8(1), 15–27.
Paudel, S. (2008). Strength properties of bamboo and its potential in construction. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology, 9, 145–150.
Saha, D., Biswas, R., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2022). Bamboo biomass as an alternative fuel in South Asia. Renewable Energy, 189, 234–245.
Singh, R., Patel, M., & Verma, S. (2024). Bamboo as green gold: Economic and ecological perspectives. International Journal of Forestry Research, 31(1), 50–62.
van Dam, J., El Bassam, N., & Tardio, G. (2018). Bamboo as a substitute for wood: A review of global experiences. Journal of Renewable Resources, 24(3), 177–190.
Xu, X., Wang, L., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Timber demand and environmental implications in developing countries. Forest Policy and Economics, 141, 102–118.
Yan Sun, L., Huang, J., & Zhao, P. (2022). Design innovations in bamboo weaving crafts. Journal of Design and Craft Studies, 10(2), 45–61.
Copyright (c) 2025 Kuntai Kool Isaac, Francis Mburu, PhD, Meshack Lagat, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
