Environmental Impact Assessment Follow–Up in Central Uganda’s Processing and Manufacturing Industries: Implications for Achieving Sustainable Development

  • George Edema Taako University of Nairobi
  • James Karatu Kiemo, PhD University of Nairobi
  • Edward Andama, PhD Busitema University
Keywords: Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Follow-up, Processing and Manufacturing Industries, Sustainable Development
Share Article:

Abstract

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) was introduced in Uganda by the National Environment Act 1995, now repealed by the National Environment Act 2019. EIA was made operational by the EIA Regulations, 1998, which is now replaced by the National Environment (Environmental and Social Assessment) Regulations 2020. It is generally agreed that the EIA follow-up is an essential part of the EIA process, without which EIA becomes a pro-forma exercise seeking plan or project approval. This paper assesses the legal and regulatory provisions for EIA follow-up and the actual practice in central Uganda’s processing and manufacturing industries for 24 years (1995-2019) of practice. Data was collected from key categories of EIA stakeholders, including the affected public, the interested public, the developers, and the regulator or its delegated entities. Data was collected between 2018 and 2019 using a review of related literature, documentary analysis, checklists, key informant interviews, and specifically designed questionnaires for the different categories of key EIA stakeholders. Data was analyzed using largely descriptive statistics and, to some extent, inferential statistics. Our finding was that there was a wide gap between law and the actual practice of EIA follow-up. Specifically, there was limited monitoring by the regulator, absent post-assessment environmental audit, low to moderate implementation of mitigation measures and poor communication between the developers and the affected public. This was mainly due to poor implementation of the pre-approval phases of the EIA process and other context factors. The paper made several recommendations to improve the design and implementation of the EIA follow-up program

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akello, C. E. (2007). Environmental regulation in Uganda: successes and challenges. Law Env’t & Dev. J., 1–20.

Akurut, M., Niwagaba, C. B., & Willems, P. (2017). Long-term variations of water quality in the Inner Murchison Bay, Lake Victoria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(22). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5730-4

Angus Morrison-Saunders, & Arts, J. (edits). (2004). Assessing Impacts. Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow - up. London. Earthscan Publications.

Fagan, A., & Sircar, I. (2010). Compliance without governance: The role of NGOs in environmental impact assessment processes in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Environmental Politics, 19(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.489714

George Edema Taako, Edward Andama, J. K. K. (2023). An Evaluation of the Participation of the Affected Public in Environmental Impact Assessments ( EIAs ) For Manufacturing and Processing Industries in the Central Region of Uganda. East Africa Journal of Environment and Natural Resources, 6(1), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajenr.6.1.1548.432

GoU. (2007). Uganda Vision 2040. Uganda Ministry Finance and Economic Development. https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/downloads/policy-database/UGANDA%29 Vision 2040.pdf

GoU. (2017). The Republic of Uganda Local Government Performance Assessment Manual,. In Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (Issue June).

Heaton, C., & Burns, S. (2014). An evaluation of environmental impact assessment in Abu Dhabi , United Arab Emirates. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(3), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.908004

Hollands, R., & Palframan, L. (2014). EIA and EMS integration : not wasting the opportunity. In Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (Vol. 32, Issue 1, pp. 43–54). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.875670

IEA, I. &. (2006). Principles of environmental impact assessment, best practice, International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) and Institute of Environmental Assessment (IEA). U.K. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:PRINCIPLES+OF+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+ASSESSMENT+BEST+PRACTICE#4

Jalava, K., Haakana, A., & Kuitunen, M. (2015). The rationale for and practice of EIA follow-up : an analysis of Finnish road projects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(4), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2015.1069997

Jones, R., & Fischer, T. B. (2016). EIA Follow-Up in the UK-A 2015 Update. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433321650006X

Joseph, C., Gunton, T., & Rutherford, M. (2015). Good practices for environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(4), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2015.1063811

Kabenge, M., Wang, H., & Li, F. (2016). Urban eutrophication and its spurring conditions in the Murchison Bay of Lake Victoria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(1), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5675-0

Kahangirwe, P., & Vanclay, F. (2022a). Evaluating the effectiveness of a national environmental and social impact assessment system : lessons from Uganda. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2021.1991202

Kahangirwe, P., & Vanclay, F. (2022b). Evaluating the effectiveness of a national environmental and social impact assessment system: lessons from Uganda. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2021.1991202

Khan, M., Chaudhry, M. N., Ahmad, S. R., & Saif, S. (2020). The role of and challenges facing non-governmental organizations in the environmental impact assessment process in Punjab, Pakistan. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1684096

Khosravi, F., Jha-thakur, U., & Fischer, T. B. (2019). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Iran. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 74(June 2018), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.10.005

Kolhoff, A. J., Runhaar, H. A. C., Gugushvili, T., Sonderegger, G., Leest, B. Van Der, & Driessen, P. P. J. (2016). The in fl uence of actor capacities on EIA system performance in low and middle income countries — Cases from Georgia and Ghana. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 57, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.011

Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582

Lewis, G. &. (2014). Administrative units profiliferation. American Political Science Review, 108(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000567

Lewis, J. I. (2014). When Decentralization Leads to Recentralization: Subnational State Transformation in Uganda. Regional and Federal Studies, 24(5), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2014.971771

Luyiga, S., Haande, S., Semyalo, R. P., Kizito, Y. S., Miyingo-Kezimbira, A., Brettum, P., Solheim, A. L., Odong, R., Asio, S. M., Jensen, K. H., & Larsson, P. (2015). How water exchange and seasonality affect the eutrophication of Murchison Bay, Lake Victoria. Limnologica, 53, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2015.06.001

Marshall, R., Arts, J., Morrison-saunders, A., Marshall, R., Arts, J., & Morrison-saunders, A. (2005a). International principles for best practice EIA follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765490

Marshall, R., Arts, J., Morrison-saunders, A., Marshall, R., Arts, J., & Morrison-saunders, A. (2005b). International principles for best practice EIA follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765490

Morrison-Saunders, A., Marshall, R., & Arts, J. (2007). EIA Follow-Up International Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series No6. International Association for Impact Assessment, 6, 1–4. https://goo.gl/QRkFqZ

Morrison-saunders, A., Sánchez, L. E., Retief, F., Sinclair, J., Doelle, M., Jones, M., Wessels, J., Pope, J., Sánchez, L. E., Retief, F., Sinclair, J., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Gearing up impact assessment as a vehicle for achieving the UN sustainable development goals. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1677089

Namuhani, N. (2015). Soil Contamination with Heavy Metals around Jinja Steel Rolling Mills in Jinja Municipality , Uganda. J Health Pollution, 9, 61–67.

NEMA. (1995). The National Environment Act, 1995 Cap 153.

NEMA. (2019). The National Environment Act, 2019.

NPA. (n.d.). Third National Development Plan (NDP III) 2020/21 – 2024/25.

Partidario, M. R. (2020). Transforming the capacity of impact assessment to address persistent global problems. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(2), 146–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2020.1724005

Paul, Walakira; James, O.-O. (2011). Impact of Industrial Effluents on Water Quality of Streams in Nakawa-Ntinda , Uganda. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage, 15(2), 289–296.

Pierre, F., & Wondwosen, S. (2016). Assessment of the Environment Pollution and its impact on Economic Cooperation and Integration Initiatives of the IGAD Region ; National Environment Pollution Report – Ethiopia Framework Contract Beneficiaries 2013. Research Gate, April, 34. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2830.2480

Pinto, E., Morrison-Saunders, A., Bond, A., Pope, J., & Retief, F. (2019). Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433321950008X

Taako, G. E., Karatu, K., & Edward, A. (2020). An evaluation of the environmental impact assessment practice in Uganda : challenges and opportunities for achieving sustainable development. Heliyon, 6(July), e04758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04758

UN. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In United Nations, General Assembly (Vol. 22, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12341375

UN. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio , Brazil , 3 to 14 June 1992. June.

UNCST. (2014). National guidelines for research involving humans as research participants. In National guidelines for research involving humans as research participants (Issue July).

Zhang, J., Kørnøv, L., & Christensen, P. (2013). Critical factors for EIA implementation: Literature review and research options. Journal of Environmental Management, 114(January 2020), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.030

Zvijáková, L., Zeleňáková, M., Purcz, P., & Zvija, L. (2014). Evaluation of environmental impact assessment effectiveness in Slovakia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.893124

Published
13 February, 2024
How to Cite
Taako, G., Kiemo, J., & Andama, E. (2024). Environmental Impact Assessment Follow–Up in Central Uganda’s Processing and Manufacturing Industries: Implications for Achieving Sustainable Development. East African Journal of Environment and Natural Resources, 7(1), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajenr.7.1.1756