A Review of the Quality of Environmental and Social Impact Statements: The Case of Geothermal Energy Projects in Kenya
Abstract
Evaluation of the quality of Environmental and Social Impact Statements (ESISs) for proposed development action is vital in ascertaining their fitness in informing critical decisions on a proposed development action. In this paper, we present findings of an evaluation of the quality of fifteen (15) ESISs for the geothermal energy resource projects in Kenya in the period 1994-2019. The review which was based on the Lee and Colley Review Package (LCRP), involved a systematic evaluation of how well a number of assessment tasks were performed in four (4) review areas, 13 categories and 40 subcategories. Starting from the lowest level and moving systematically up the hierarchy, the review involved evaluating how well a number of assessment tasks were performed. The quality of each review subcategory within a particular category was assessed. The subcategory assessment results and the relevant impression gained from the ESIS were then used to assess the review category. The result of the assessment of the review category was used to assess each review area of the ESIS. The overall quality of the ESIS was derived from the outcome of the assessment of each of the review areas by considering the main strengths and weaknesses. Results showed seven percent (7%) of the ESISs were of excellent quality, 20% were good, 53% were acceptable, and 13% were of poor quality. Six percent (6%) were of excellent quality in three (3) review areas of identification & evaluation of key impacts, presentation of impact statement and description of the development and baseline conditions. Eighty percent (80%) were of good quality in the review area of the description of the development and baseline conditions, while 60% were of good quality in the review area of the presentation of the impact statement. Six per cent (6%) were of very poor quality in the review area of the environmental and social management plan and follow-up. Inadequacies and gaps identified in subcategories that constitute consultation and public participation, impact identification and analysis of alternatives, and environmental and social management plans can be addressed by target training of Impact Assessment Practitioners (IAPs) and strengthening of legislation on public participation. This will contribute to improving the quality of future ESISs while supporting better-informed environmental and social decisions regarding proposed development actions
Downloads
References
Ahmad, B., & Wood, C. (2002). A comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey, and Tunisia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(3), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-9255(02)00004-5
Anifowose, B., Lawler, D., Van der Horst, D., & Chapman, L. (2016). A systematic quality assessment of environmental impact statements in the oil and gas industry. Science of The Total Environment, 572, 570-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.083
Aung, T. S., Shengji, L., & Condon, S. (2018). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of Chinese EIA in Myanmar: Myitsone dam, the Lappadaung copper mine and the Sino-Myanmar oil and gas pipelines. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 37(1), 71- 85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2018.1529948
Barasa, P.J. (2015). Public participation in the implementation of 280MW power project at Olkaria in Naivasha Sub- County, Nakuru County, Kenya. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress; April 19-25; Melbourne, Australia. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1059.5151&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Barasa, PJ. (2016). Integration of environmental assessment in geothermal resource development process: A case study of Olkaria geothermal fields. Proceedings, 6th African Rift Geothermal Conference; Nov 2-4; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. http://theargeo.org/fullpapers/INTEGRATION%20OF%20ENVIRONMENTAL%20ASSESSMENT%20IN%20GEOTHERMAL%20%20RESOURCE%20DEVELOPMENT%20PROCESS.pdf
Bishoge, O. K., & Mvile, B. N. (2022). A critique of the EIA report selected from the East African region, taking into consideration what is required in an ideal of EIA report. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 8-17. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2022.v7.7478
Byambaa, B., & De Vries, W. T. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of the environmental impact assessment process in Mongolia for nomadic-pastoral land users. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38 (1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1643629
Caro, A. L., & Toro, J. J. (2016). Effectiveness index for environmental impact assessment methodologies. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 203, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.2495/eid160071
Chanthy, S., & Grünbühel, C. M. (2015). Critical challenges to consultants in pursuing quality of environmental and social impact assessments (ESIA) in Cambodia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(3), 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2015.1049488
Choji, V. D., Rampedi, I. T., Modley, L. S., & Ifegbesan, A. P. (2022). An evaluation of the quality of environmental impact assessment reports in the mobile telecommunications infrastructure sector: The case of plateau state in Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912659
Cloquell-Ballester, V., Monterde-Díaz, R., & Santamarina-Siurana, M. (2006). Indicators validation for the improvement of environmental and social impact quantitative assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.002
Corsi, S., Oppio, A., & Dendena, B. (2015). ESIA (environmental and social impact assessment): a tool to minimise territorial conflicts. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 43, 2215-2220. doi: 10.3303/CET1543370
Dendena, B., & Corsi, S. (2015). The environmental and social impact assessment: A further step towards an integrated assessment process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 965-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.110
Fedra, K., Winkelbauer, L., & Pantulu, V. R. (1991). Expert systems for environmental screening: An application in the Lower Mekong Basin. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Laxenburg. Austria.
Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (1999). Introduction to environmental impact assessment: Principles and procedures, process, practice, and prospects. Routledge.
Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (2012). Introduction to environmental impact assessment (4th ed.). Routledge.
Glucker, A. N., Driessen, P. P., Kolhoff, A., & Runhaar, H. A. (2013). Public participation in environmental impact assessment: Why, who and how? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43, 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003
Gupta, A. K., Gupta, S. K., & Patil, R. S. (2005). Environmental management plan for port and harbour projects. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 7(2), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-004-0266-7
Gwimbi, P., & Nhamo, G. (2016). Benchmarking the effectiveness of mitigation measures to the quality of environmental impact statements: Lessons and insights from mines along the great dyke of Zimbabwe. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(2), 527-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9663-9
Jalava, K., Pasanen, S., Saalasti, M., & Kuitunen, M. (2010). Quality of environmental impact assessment: Finnish EISs and the opinions of EIA professionals. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155110x488826
Jay, S., Jones, C., Slinn, P., & Wood, C. (2007). Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(4), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001
Kabir, S., & Momtaz, S. (2014). Sectorial variation in the quality of environmental impact statements and factors influencing the quality. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(11), 1595-1611. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.824415
Kamijo, T., & Huang, G. (2016). Improving the quality of environmental impacts assessment reports: Effectiveness of alternatives analysis and public involvement in JICA supported projects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1176402
Koissaba, B. R. (2017). Geothermal Energy and Indigenous Communities. The Olkaria Projects in Kenya (The Road from Paris to Sustainable Development: Effectively Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality into EU Climate Actions Report). https://eu.boell.org/sites/default/files/geothermal-energy-and-indigenous-communities-olkariaproject-kenya.pdf
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International.
Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Lawrence, D. P. (1997). Quality and effectiveness of environmental impact assessments: Lessons and insights from ten assessments in Canada. Project Appraisal, 12(4), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1997.9727064
Lee, N., Colley, R., Bonde, J., & Simpson, J. (1999). Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Appraisals (Occasional Paper 55 (1999)). EIA Centre Department of Planning and Landscape University of Manchester. https://blogs.ubc.ca/environmentalimpactassessment/files/2015/11/Colley-Bonde-Simpson_1999_Reviewing-the-quality-of-environmental-statements-and-environmental-appraisals.pdf
Machaka, R. K. (2020). The improved model of the method, rights, and resources (MRR) for the evaluation of the EIA system: Revising the sustainability indicators. Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Lighting - a Bet for the Future, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88747
Malepe, K. V., González, A., & Retief, F. P. (2022). Evaluating the quality of environmental impact assessment reports (EIARs) for tourism developments in protected areas: The Kruger to canyons biosphere case study. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(5), 384-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2022.2091055
Mangi, M. P. (2017, November). Geothermal exploration in Kenya: Status report and updates [Paper presentation]. Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Short Course II on Exploration and Development of Geothermal Resources, Lake Bogoria and Naivasha, Kenya.
Mangi, P. (2016). Geothermal exploration and utilisation in Kenya [Paper presentation]. Geothermal Training Programme, United Nations University.
Mangi, P. M. (2018). Geothermal development in Kenya—Country updates [Paper presentation]. The 7th African Rift geothermal conference, Kigali, Rwanda.
Mariita, N. O. (2002). The impact of large-scale renewable energy development on the poor: Environmental and socio-economic impact of a geothermal power plant on a poor rural community in Kenya. Energy Policy, 30 (11-12), 1119-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00063-0
Momtaz, S., & Kabir, S. M. (2013). Evaluating environmental and social impact assessment in developing countries. Newnes
Mora-Barrantes, J. C., Sibaja-Brenes, J. P., Piedra-Marin, G., & Molina-Leon, O. M. (2018). Environmental impact assessment of 17 construction projects in various university campuses. International Journal of Environmental Impacts: Management, Mitigation and Recovery, 1(4), 433-449. https://doi.org/10.2495/ei-v1-n4-433-449
Mounir, Z. M. (2015). Evaluation of the quality of environmental impact assessment reports using Lee and Colley package in Niger Republic. Modern Applied Science, 9(1), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v9n1p89
Muse, G. S. (2016). Environmental and social impact assessment for Modular power plants project in Menengai, Nakuru County, Kenya: Impact Identification, evaluation and risk analysis. Journal of Environmental Pollution Research, 4(2), 1-12.
Omenda, P., & Mangi, P. (2016, November). Country Update Report for Kenya [Paper presentation]. 6th African Rift Geothermal Conference, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. http://theargeo.org/fullpapers/COUNTRY%20UPDATE%20REPORT%20FOR%20 KENYA%202016.pdf
Omenda, P., Mangi, P., Ofwona, C., & Mwangi, M. (2020, April). Country update report for Kenya 2015-2019 [Paper presentation]. World Geothermal Congress 2020+1, Reykjavik, Iceland. https://www.geothermal- energy.org/pdf/IGAstandard/WGC/2020/01055.pdf
Omenge, P. M., Eshiamwata, G. W., Makindi, S. M., & Obwoyere, G. O. (2019). Public participation in Environmental Impact Assessment and its substantive contribution to environmental risk management: Insights from EIA practitioners and other stakeholders in Kenya’s renewable energy sub-sector. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 237, 133- 144. https://doi.org/10.2495/esus190121
Omenge, P. M., Obwoyere, G. O., Eshiamwata, G. W., Makindi, S. M., & Nathwani, J. (2020). Environmental and social impact assessment procedural steps that underpin conflict identification: Reference to renewable energy resource development in Kenya. International Journal of Energy Production and Management, 5(2), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.2495/eq-v5-n2-157-174
Omenge, P. M., Obwoyere, G. O., Eshiamwata, G. W., Makindi, S. M., & Nathwani, J. (2022). Improving quality of environmental and social impact assessment reports: A statistical analysis. International Journal of Environmental Impacts: Management, Mitigation and Recovery, 5(2), 146-160. https://doi.org/10.2495/ei-v5-n2-146-160
Ortiz, G., Domínguez-Gómez, J. A., Aledo, A., & Urgeghe, A. M. (2018). Participatory multi-criteria decision analysis for prioritising impacts in environmental and social impact assessments. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 14 (1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2018.1510237
Ortolano, L., & Shepherd, A. (1995). Environmental impact assessment: Challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment, 13(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1995.9726076
Peterson, K. (2010). Quality of environmental impact statements and variability of scrutiny by reviewers. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(3), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.009
Saif, S., Mehmood, A., Chaudhry, M. N., & Akhtar, S. (2015). Evaluating the adequacy and quality of environment impact assessment (EIA) reports in Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 17(03), 1550030. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333215500301
Sandham, L. A., Huysamen, C., Retief, F. P., Morrison-Saunders, A., Bond, A. J., Pope, J., & Alberts, R. C. (2020). Evaluating environmental impact assessment report quality in South African national parks. Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science, 62(1), 1-9.
Slootweg, R., Vanclay, F., & Van Schooten, M. (2001). Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19 (1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154601781767186
Steinemann, A. (2001). Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-9255(00)00075-5
Tang, Z., Bright, E., & Brody, S. (2009). Evaluating California local land use plan’s environmental impact reports. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(2), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.03.002
Veronez, F. A., & Montaño, M. (2018, May). Towards a systematic use of quality review packages [Paper presentation]. 38th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Durban, South Africa. https://conferences.iaia.org/2018/final-papers/Montano,%20Marcelo%20-%20Towards%20the%20systematic%20use%20of%20quality%20review%20packs.pdf
Yang, T. (2019). The emergency of the environmental impact assessment duty as a global legal norm and general principles of law. Hastings Law Journal, 70 (2), 525-572: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol70/iss2/6
Copyright (c) 2022 Philip M. Omenge, Gilbert O. Obwoyere, PhD, George W. Eshiamwata, PhD, Stanley M. Makindi, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
