Application of Pls-Sem in Developing a Maintenance Management Model to Enhance Generator Maintainability in Government Institutions

  • Jefta Dickson Moshi Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology
  • Victor Pius Chombo, PhD Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology
Keywords: PLS-SEM, Generator Maintainability, Path Analysis, Downtime, MTTR, Maintenance Management
Share Article:

Abstract

This study applies Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling to develop a maintenance management model aimed at enhancing the maintainability of government-owned generators. Key factors influencing maintainability, such as equipment age and condition, operational environment, regulatory compliance, maintenance practices, design complexity, spare parts availability, electrical connection integrity, fuel quality, load management, and personnel competence, were analysed. Data from 68 generators, including downtime, failure frequency, and Mean Time to Repair (MTTR), were normalised and weighted to quantify factor importance. Total Downtime (weight = 0.65) was identified as the most critical performance metric, followed by Frequency of Failures (0.26) and MTTR (0.14). PLS-SEM path analysis revealed that Operational Environment (0.838) and Electrical Connection Integrity (0.584) positively impact repair efficiency, whereas poor Load Management & Generator Sizing (-1.264), advanced generator age (-0.645), and high Design Complexity (-0.593) negatively influence maintainability. The refined regression model shows that Avg. MTTR serves as a key mediating variable linking operational and design factors to maintainability outcomes. Model validation using R² (0.763), CR (≥ 0.70), AVE (≥ 0.50), and fit indices (RMSEA < 0.08, CFI/TLI ≥ 0.90) confirmed the model’s predictive and explanatory power. The proposed framework (Figure 1) provides a structured, evidence-based approach for prioritising maintenance interventions, optimising resource allocation, and improving generator reliability, availability, and operational efficiency in government institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agency, I. E. (2023). Government-Owned Power Utilities. https://doi.org/Retrieved from www.iea.org

Akintola, O. (2022). Enhancing Maintainability in Public Sector Assets. A Structural Model Approach. Public Management Review, 24(1), 40-58.

Ali, M. (2019). Effectiveness of Maintenance Practices in Government-Owned Facilities: A Case Study. Journal of Maintenance Engineering, 4(197-214).

Basu, S., & Kayal, S. (2019). Design Strategies for Generator Maintainability. International Journal of Energy Engineering, 8(2), 125-134.

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.

Hassan, & Kamaruddin. (2021). Factors Influencing the Maintainability of Public Sector Projects: A Relationship Perspective.s. Construction Management and Economic, 39(6), 535-549.

Johnson, T., & Wells, P. (2021). Impact of Equipment Age on Maintenance Strategies: A Study of Generators. Journal of Maintenance Engineering, 15(4), 44-59.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Lee, H., Carter, J., & Smith, K. (2022). Environmental Factors in Generator Maintenance: Understanding Operational Challenges. Renewable 3), 308-319.

Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press. Energy Systems,

Martin, J., Roberts, C., & Lewis, M. (2023). The Role of Technology in Modern Generator Maintenance Practices. Journal of Technology and Management, 9(1), 89-102.

Owen, D. (2023). The Importance of Skilled Maintenance Personnel in Managing Generator Performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly,

Patel, R., Doe, J., & Kumar, A. (2020). Preventive Maintenance in Indust 34(1), 57-74.

rial Generators: A Comparative Study. Maintenance Management Journal, 10(1), 12-20.

Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Alternative Methods for Assessing Mediation in Multilevel Data: The Advantages of Multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(2), 161–182.

Reed, F., & Marshall, T. (2023). Financial Constraints and Their Implications for Public Sector Maintenance Strategies. Public Finance Review, 41(3), 215-233.

Salih et al. (2021). Evaluating the Implementation of Maintenance Models in Public-Owned Utilities. Utilities Policy, 69, 101-111.

Smith, L., & Gonzalez, A. (2024). Strategies for Spare Parts Management in Government-Owned Generators. Journal of Supply Chain Management.

Thomas, E., & Hughes, L. (2023). Regulatory Influence on Generator Maintenance Practices: . A Review of Existing Literature; Government Operations Review, , 11(2), 142-157.

Published
12 November, 2025
How to Cite
Moshi, J., & Chombo, V. (2025). Application of Pls-Sem in Developing a Maintenance Management Model to Enhance Generator Maintainability in Government Institutions. East African Journal of Engineering, 8(2), 340-352. https://doi.org/10.37284/eaje.8.2.3956